Hello China, Japan, Thailand and Turkey and welcome to the blog...and cheers for more feedback...and apologies for very late, rather short post...long day that started early and included the charming news that a local man is to be jailed for the Child Abuse/Pornography case from Tarpeena, and his partner is yet to be convicted, a case where SAPol took a full 2 years to look at the computers/laptops to then realise that it was the couples own toddler in the images...
SAPol left that child in that situation for 2 years...and that was followed later by reports that a primary school teacher in Mt Gambier has been convicted of Child Sexual Abuse offenses, sorry, don't have the details to hand but will get and post...then forgot that it was Council meeting, which took up hours I'd set for bloggin'...and 'ere we are, it's 2200 plus some...damn I'm tired...
Correction: Apologies but apparently it is a Criminal Offense to talk about the Banana Lord, in that a conviction results in a Criminal Record...(that could rule you out of politics, put you on 'watch-lists', create problems if you ever try to travel, be used to leverage further charges with greater penalties, eg Defamation stuff that has gaol time attached, etc-Ed)...well yes, all potentially possible, but the real concern is that it's happening at all...(I was sortta' referring to the Crown Solicitor threatening to gaol you for speaking out about the rank corruption of the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up-Ed)...
Indeed, that's where I erred, in that the threat/reference to "Criminal Liability" re alleged 'defamation against the CSO' was a threat of conviction with record and potentially with gaol attached, but with the Banana Lord stuff it's conviction and record and fine...(just fine-Ed)...a $30,000 just fine...(and what ever did happen with those threats from the CSO from 7+ years ago?-Ed)...I believe I told them that they're corrupt bastards who have been entirely complicit in covering-up the abuse of my child and dozens of others, and in that context that they ought to judiciously sod off...(I believe your believin's-Ed)...all this previously posted...
Feedback: I won't put the whole thing up today, but I was sent (a copy of) a hilarious letter, a letter sent to a regular in this 'ere blog, alleged Professor Simon Chapman, he whom slags off anybody whom in anyway criticises Wind Turbines and their health impacts...and I say hilarious because the letter is the work of, as I understand it, an intelligent civilian but one with no formal training, degrees, etc, (at all? sorry, not sure) in the area of Wind Turbines, but by being knowledgeable about the facts re Turbines, and stating those facts clearly and intelligently to Captain Man Chaps...(you don't like Simon very much do you-Ed)...no, never met the man, but I'm very familiar with his work, and he's an absolute tool...(fair enough-Ed)...
By clearly and precisely stating the truth, El Correspondo served up Capt Simon "I'mon Drugs" ManChaps his own bollocks, on a spinning platter, resplendent in a bed of his own shredded credibility...(I've always enjoyed the edibility of a nice serve of shredded credibility...can do without the Profs bollocks though-Ed)...indeed, we could all do without his particular brand of bollocks...***just in case - that "I'mon Drugs" thingy is just a stupendously purile piece of name-calling, it is not an accusation***...(yes, good point, a quick but genuine disclaimer may well remove the necessity to have to review and re-post later-Ed)...indeed...
Clive And Let Clive: because as Politically Incorrect as Clive Palmer was at times last night on the ABC political panel show Q&A, much of what he said was factually correct...the only issue is whether or not he takes the same positions on issues once he's in the Parliament...I also can't say with any certainty whether his criticisms of China were 1) fueled by his current legal action with a Chinese company, 2) Clive trying to distance himself from his own business history, 2a) potentially to create a politically crowd pleasing faux riff with people he still finds fiscally alluring, 3) just Clive doing a Clive, or 4) a combination of all 3...4...
I used to watch Q&A religiously but now find it a trite and annoying pantomime of opposing political ideologies and rehearsed slogans...I do still try to watch it but find myself increasingly just zoning out and channel-hopping, dozing off even, and thusly I completely missed 'Clive's rant' against the Chinese, but it has been widely reported this morning...and given the way I've unloaded on a coupla' people I'm not really in a position to comment on his "mongrels" statement...
Use Your Words: a bit better Treasurer Joe Hockey, begs his compadre Finance Minister Mattias 'Always Blue' Cormann when he was trotted out yesterday to try and deflect from the fall-out of Smokin' Joe's comments last week about how 'the poor don't have cars'...Mattias kept saying that Mighty Joe 'chose his words poorly'...(and ain't that a very carefully chosen choice of words, albeit an absolute nonsense-Ed)...indeed...
A 'poor choice of words' is to say something stupid and offensive, eg, 'this new Fuel Excise Tax that I'm introducing that I've repeatedly denied is a tax and repeatedly absolutely promised in the 2013 Election campaign that I wouldn't introduce at all, that this new tax won't affect the poor much because even if they do have cars they don't go very far'...(wow, that is a stupid and offensive example, you just think of that?-Ed)...no that's not mine, that's a montaging paraphrase of what Treasurer Joe Hockey has said over the last week...(no?!-Ed)...absolutely, along with the Liberals promises from the 2013 Election of no new taxes, we won't touch pensions, etc, etc......
It's a 'poor choice of words' if you then apologise for the statements and at least attempt to explain yourself a little better...even I apologise if I know I'm wrong and/or cause unintended offense...(as opposed to all of the intended offense?-Ed)...indeed, I have had my moments as I work my way through a series of issues that cause me great distress and concern, eg, the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up, but I still apologise when I'm wrong...(and I've always thought that an intelligent person is immediately capable of 1) admitting error and 2) genuine contrition-Ed)...I concur...
I absolutely agree Ed, but in my own defense I would suggest that the vast majority of offense I cause is by speaking truths that some would rather weren't aired at all...(fair enough-Ed)...anyhoos, when held to account for this extraordinary comments re 'the poor don't have cars', Smokin' Joe didn't apologise for his offensive statements and attempt to re-word, he dug in, repeating the comments and dragging out statistics to support them...for several days...that's not 'a poor choice of words', that's a very poor attitude...it was only at the bitter end that he proffered up an apology that went down like the proverbial lead balloon...
Enough for today...
Tomorrow: Tonight's Council Meeting
If I have to go through it, so do you...but it's worth staying to the end because I didn't...sortta...explain it tomorrow...
I am Nick Fletcher and this is my blog...cheers and laters...
No comments:
Post a Comment