Having Deja Vu About Groundhog Day

Howdy y'all, and brief apology that it's been 8 days since the last post, and that this one is basically a re-hashing of multiple recent posts, and is once again pretty much just my (attached) latest letter to our South Australian Attorney-General, Liberal Vicki Chapman...in my defense, I am thoroughly knackered and more than a little 'over it', and finding it difficult to even go near the computer, let-alone blog stuff...still havin' days where I find myself standing in the lounge just lookin' at the computer before turnin' and walkin' away thinkin', 'do I really need to spend another day of my life bogged-down in the horrendous realities of the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up and the resultant Pro-Paedophile Political Persecution of my "bizarre trial"*? do I really need that?...(mmm, now say what you really think-Ed)...                                                                      (*The Border Watch)

The St Martins Cover-up is not my fault, yet somehow I cannot divest myself of that sense that I feel responsible because I haven't manage to resolve it...(man! ease-up on yourself!-Ed)...I am mate, and this 'ere is how I try to do it, get on this 'ere blog and leave great wadding-chunks of that guilt shizzle here, so's I don't have to carry it round quite so much...I think that the relentlessly corrupt conduct of Mt Gambier City Council isn't my fault, yet somehow I feel responsible...and on it goes...not my fault that the ICAC Commissioner Bruce Lander chose to come after me, but now I feel responsible for addressing all of his gross corruptions and the institutionalised corruption his appointment and conduct confirms...and for me, it all just spirals back to the St Martins Cover-up, every time...(I can see how you might end-up there-Ed)...  

Not in any way embarrassed to say that I'm not coping properly, I'm not, I'm being forced to engage in an already deeply problematic 'Appeal Process', whilst quite clearly still recovering from the outrageous abuse I was subjected to by Magistrate Ian White aways away back in November 2017...(well, not least of all because that same grossly biased harassment, threat and intimidation by Magistrate White has continued through the extraordinary 3-hearing Verdict/Judgement process of 28th February,  March, and 20th April 2018!-Ed)...well that is true...(and then you've been constantly abused, threatened and harassed outside of that by rancidly corrupt clowns like our li'l mate lawyer Bill DeGaris-Ed)...well that is also true, he did straight-out threaten me in writing but then refuse to meet me...(and tried to have posts removed, and has threatened in writing to 'get' this 'ere blog somehow, etc-Ed)...mmm, yeah, all the good stuff, screech abuse and defamation threats, then run like the clappers from any actual accountability...gidday Billy mate, what a top human being you are...   

(And then there's the truly bizarre latest effort from the Crown Solicitor!-Ed)...indeed, in a firmament ablaze with vilely complicit threats, that is a stand-out...dear availees, if y'all haven't read that letter, please to be goin' back through the last several posts to look at it, etc, 'cos it's kinda' pivotal and it is also mentioned in the attached letter below, and for no other reason, just because it really is a jolly good wheeze...(and that brings us neatly to the attached letter to Attorney-General Vicki Chapman-Ed)...well indeed it does Ed, because that CSO letter is a goodly part of my latest letter, so's we'll let the letter explain itself, here t'is...

Vicki Chapman

Attorney General

Parliament House

North Tce, Adelaide, 5000

email: agd@agd.sa.gov.au

Ms Chapman,

I refer to my emails to you regarding my recent and precedent conviction on 18 counts of breaching the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 2012, section 56 (a) and/or (b). I have not yet received any response from your office, not even a basic acknowledgement.

Those emails/letters ask you to act to resolve the many concerning procedural and legislative aspects of my “bizarre trial”, a 'trial' that ran from 3^rd February 2015 until 20^th April 2018, and that I have proven in Court to be a “Malicious Prosecution” originating with the ICAC Commissioner Bruce Lander.

As you know, “bizarre trial” is how The Border Watch newspaper described Magistrate Ian White's extraordinary conduct during my 'second trial' in November 2017; and it was Magistrate Teresa Anderson whom used the term “Malicious Prosecution” in October 2016; and that I did establish that Comm Lander himself directly referred me to SAPol.

As you are aware, I proved in Court that the sole apparent complainant against me and instigator of the “bizarre trial” was the ICAC Comm Bruce Lander, who did not follow any of his own ICAC internal processes, but instead unilaterally referred me directly to SAPol.

Her Honour Anderson used “Abuse of Process” and then “Malicious Prosecution” to legally define my repeated assertions that I was being politically persecuted in retribution for doing my blog, The Mount Gambier Independent, and most specifically, for what I have been saying about the ongoing cover-up of the abuse of my child and dozens of other grade 2 children by teacher Glyn Dorling at St Martins Lutheran School, Mt Gambier.

And of course, you are fully aware of the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up because you and I and another St Martins parent discussed it at length and in detail at the Liberal Party conference held in Mt Gambier in September/October 2004, discussions that included many other senior Liberals, eg, leader Rob Kerin.

The irrefutable facts are that I directly alleged to Her Honour Anderson that my trial was/is a “political persecution”, and that after several hearings, Her Honour was satisfied that I had proven enough of my claims to justify being provided an opportunity to prove it within the trial proper, and gave it a specific name, “Malicious Prosecution”.

As you are aware, that November 2016 'Trial' had to be adjourned on Day One because SAPol Prosecutions were trying to make multiple changes to their error-riddled 'Charge Sheet', and then collapsed in complete disarray on Day Two when Her Honour, having overnight reviewed my 100-document “Malicious Prosecution” submission, suddenly recused herself.

As you are aware, I have repeatedly requested that Chief Magistrate Hribal intervene in my 'trial' to address the extraordinary conduct of replacement Magistrate Ian White, but CM Hribal has repeatedly directed me back to either Magistrate White and/or to Comm Lander in his other role as Judicial Conduct Commissioner.

As you and CM Hribal are aware, Magistrate White's conduct has been fundamentally biased to the point of definable corruption, routinely threatening me and abusing me from the Bench and openly colluding with SAPol Prosecutions.

His extraordinary conduct in November 2017 led The Border Watch to that description, “bizarre trial”, and that bizarreness included subpoenaing my doctor and discussing my private medical issues in Open Court, before over-riding my official Medical Certificate and the doctor's stated concerns about my 'mental health', and proceeding to convict me in my 'absence'.

As you are aware, I required that Medical Certificate because I was physically and mentally exhausted after being subjected to two full days of outrageous threats and outright abuse from Magistrate White, two days of his undisguised bias and his corrupt collusion with SAPol Prosecutions, eg, I only recently realised that Magistrate White has helped SAPol Prosecutions address some but not all of the still-present and massive errors in their Charge Sheet by just changing the charges for them in his 'Judgement' of 28^th February 2018.

Having taken every appropriate measure to protect myself from Magistrate White's vile abuse, I was then subjected to the extraordinary experience of hearing my Wednesday morning doctor's appointment and the relevant Courtroom discussion of Thursday, all reported on the ABC Radio early on the Friday, and then got to read about it in The Border Watch later that day.

In my most recent email I provided you with the latest extraordinary threat-laden but anonymous letter claiming to be from the Crown Solicitor Mr Wait, and the equally extraordinary anonymous follow-up 'confirmation' from 'CSO Reception', and I have asked you to act on this outrageous act of threat, harassment, bullying and intimidation from the Crown Solicitor.

Also, this CSO Threat Letter alleges to be on behalf of and in response to the Courts Administration Authority, whom supposedly contacted the CSO about unidentified “material” on my blog, TMGI, that might possibly be “Contempt of Court”.

Does this relate to Magistrate White's perpetual threats about Contempt of Court, threats made to me at virtually every hearing in 2017/18, and that was literally the last thing he said on 20^th April 2018? As the Crown Solicitor has refused to do so, please define for me these alleged multiple Contempt of Court issues.

As you are aware, after having my first Application to Appeal rejected despite me correctly lodging the advised forms in the advised manner and well within the prescribed time frame, I am now currently bogged-down trying to re-apply to be allowed to 'Apply to Appeal' my “bizarre trial” (and extraordinary precedent conviction and subsequent fine of $540,000, as commuted to 260hrs of community service and Court fines of $3,300) in a context where I have no legal advice for this Precedent Appeal Process.

And, as this is the Precedent Appeal of a Precedent Conviction regarding the undefinable ICAC Act 2012 section 56, the legislation which remained undefined in Court despite my conviction, etc, because it is a precedent there is no relevant case law to refer to.

I remind you Ms Chapman, that when your former colleague and current Member for Mt Gambier, Troy Bell, asked your Liberal lawyers on my behalf (May 2014), those lawyers declined to provide any advise on those specific grounds, that even to them it was an undefinable precedent.

Therefore, I, as a private citizen forced to self-represent, am being openly 'politically persecuted' via undefined and undefinable legislation, with nowhere to go for advice or even some relevant case law to try and review; it is an impossible situation that should not be occurring at all.

As you are aware, the ICAC Act 2012, especially section 56, and/or the ICAC Miscellaneous Amendment Act 2014 directly contravene Constitutional Law, and my conviction openly and completely criminalises factually accurate discussion of political issues.

It is not hyperbole to refer to the ICAC Act 2012 section 56 as Fascism; this is deliberately undefinable legislation, that, by application and as witnessed in my Political Persecution and subsequent conviction, is a purely political weapon being used against 'enemies of the State' via police and a compliant or complicit Judiciary.

As you are aware, and as Magistrate White and CM Hribal and former AG John Rau, etc, are all aware, this trial should not even have happened before the requisite COAG-style meeting ruled on the Constitutional Law issues, and that my 'conviction' directly impinges on Constitutional Law.

Furthermore, you are aware that Labor's AG John Rau colluded with ICAC Comm Lander to alter the ICAC legislation via the ICAC Miscellaneous Amendment Act in November 2014, and in the exact manner that addressed questions posed by my (then) lawyer.

As you are aware, ICAC Comm Lander and AG John Rau changed the ICAC legislation in that exact manner so as to allow me being prosecuted, and they did so after I had already been 'reported' by SAPol; they changed the law so that I could be retrospectively prosecuted.

Why, therefore, with all of this gross legislative and procedural malpractice is it my responsibility to 'Appeal' this outrageous travesty? As it clearly does contravene Constitutional Law, this trial should never have happened and you as Attorney-General should be appealing it on those grounds. 

I formally request that you intervene, as the legal representative for everyone in South Australia, and convene the COAG meeting that you know is required to review this legislation, and that the subsequent ruling by COAG be applied to quash my 'conviction'.

I also request an immediate official response from you acknowledging that you are pursuing this necessary COAG meeting, and that therefore all issues involving my 'conviction', including the Appeal Process, are deemed to be 'on hold' until that COAG review has concluded and approved or otherwise the South Australian ICAC Act 2012/2014, and in particular, section 56.

I need this response immediately please because I have to provide some sort of 'current documentation' to both Correctional Services and the Fines Dept.

Yours,

Nick Fletcher

   
...and so there you go...my new analogy for myself is the old bear shambling head-down into the blizzard, always into, never away from, wolf-pack snapping at it's heels, day in, day out, weeks into months into years, always head down but always shambling forward...(yeah, nice, and occasionally some dumb mutt gets cocky and gets all up in the bear's grill and shizzle, and the bear begrudgingly crushes it with a casual swipe-Ed)...not quite with you...(well, you're constantly under attack by these clowns, and almost always from 'behind', because when they get in front of ya' and try to engage with threatening letters, etc, despite how exhausted you are, you literally 'literally' pound them into the ground with the crushing brutality of your own truthful letters-Ed)...mmm, I can see that, nice...

Tomorrow: Mt Gambier City Council's Latest Lies

The latest lies from MGCC about the Rail Roundhouse, the $40million Sports Facility, the Rail Lands, you name it, we got it...(but don't those extraordinary Magistrate White Suppression/Apprehension Orders from your "bizarre trial", effectively mean you're banned from MGCC meetings?-Ed)...indeed, and that's exactly what that 'Order' is designed to do, but Ed, mate, I've been to so many MGCC meetings that I don't need to attend to be well aware of exactly how they conduct themselves...(and fair enough-Ed)...and there's been heaps in local and social media, more than enough to paint me a pretty picture...

I am Nick Fletcher and I haven't even mentioned in this letter and/or post that I am also 'Operation Baritone', an ICAC and/or SAPol Anti-Corruption Branch 'Operation' dedicated solely to li'l ol' moi, well, me and this 'ere blog...(may I just say, wow!-Ed)...indeed you may sir...furthermore, nor have I mentioned that it was ICAC's and SAPol's evidence in my "bizarre trial" that there is no related ICAC/SAPol documentation, not one single memo/email/whatevs, not nuthin' to indicate who instigated/approved/actioned/whatevs 'Operation Baritone'...(wow-Ed)...indeed, ICAC and/or SAPol have seen fit to convene an 'Operation', an enormous commitment of time and resources, to go after a private citizen for 'blogging', but there is not one single document, apparently/allegedly 'Operation Baritone' has just somehow manifested itself out of the ether sometime mid-February 2014 or just prior...(wow, and is it still current, 'Operation Baritone'?-Ed)...dunno', haven't heard otherwise...

I am Nick Fletcher and this is my blog...cheers and laters...  

And What Does Mt Gambier Think Of SA's ICAC?

Troy Bell is the Member for Mt Gambier...(Stage Direction:- Nick Fletcher holds computer keyboard out at arms length, drops it, and walks-off, stage right)...(bahahahhaahhahaahaha, nice one man-Ed)...

Short post to say that I was in Court yesterday (18th June 2018) for Troy Bell's 'Plea Hearing', where-in I, I mean he, sorry, force of habit, 'he' pleaded Not Guilty to all 24 charges (23? sorry)...and the obvious reality being referred to in my hilarious opening number, is that Mr Bell was returned as the Member at the March 2018 State Election...(with I believe an increased majority-Ed)...returned despite the fact that he was/is facing these 23/24 ICAC charges, relating to allegedly de-frauding just over $2,000,000...so what does that tell ya' about what the SE thinks of ICAC?...(ahahahaahahaahhhhh, hah-Ed)...indeed Ed, and I'm quietly confident you ain't the only one havin' a quiet chuckle over that...

One genuinely believes that one has contributed...(or two have, there's two of us-Ed)...whatevs, I genuinely believe that this 'ere blog has played some small part in that opinion of ICAC...(well I'd suggest that ICAC's own conduct defines itself as a corrupt joke!-Ed)...well indeed Ed, but where does one go to read about the farcically frightening and wholly corrupt conduct of ICAC Comm Bruce Lander?...(well, right here on this 'ere blog I'd reckon-Ed)...exactly, right here on this 'ere blog...(it's certainly where Mt Gambier City Councillor Josh Lynagh goes for his info when he's bangin'-on about us and/or ICAC-Ed)...indeed Ed, and I'm not sure exactly whether that's 'irony' or not...(but it'll do 'til sumthin' better happens along?-Ed)...well indeed...

Apols, haven't checked it out in months, but no need really because I hear about it often enough, and it's all rather sadly predictable anyway, whatevs, but some time back I did see where MGCC Cr Josh Lynagh's web-page thingy had the lad himself sycophantically summarising My Bestie And Also In His Spare Time ICAC Comm Bruce Lander as being, 'like totes the best and completely in charge of everything and like the police even, and you even need like his written permission to speak to a lawyer, even'...(wow-Ed)...indeed Ed, and yes, of course, I'm being mercilessly mocking of my main man Josh, mate...(maaate-Ed)...but that's exactly what he was saying/doing, and that last bit is damn near a quote, and said in praise of the Powers of Bruce...(wow-Ed)...oh yeah, not as a shreeeek! of concern about the rank Fascism of needing permission to have a lawyer, but as a jubilant quantifier as to how important MBAAIHSTIC Bruce is...(if it weren't so sad, and so genuinely concerning, it'd be hilarious-Ed)...

But what is undeniably hilarious, and hilarious not just despite of but also because of the extraordinarily serious context, where'd the li'l Josh man get his info from?...(ummm, what?-Ed)...how is it that Josh, mate, knows that you need written permission from MBAAIHSTIC Bruce to speak to a lawyer? my mate Bruce didn't tell him, so where did he get that from?...(I'm gunna' guess, from the look on your face, that it's us...it's us isn't it?-Ed)...yep...(and those letters where-in the South East Community Legal Service wrote to Bruce, twice, asking if they, your Legal Eagles, actual lawyers, if they were even allowed to speak to their 'client', even though their 'client' hadn't even been 'charged' with anything yet?-Ed)...that be they, the Leagles, the letters, the questions about all that, and the truly extraordinary response from MBAAIHSTIC Bruce, a written 'Authorisation' allowing me to speak to my family, friends, a doctor, and very carefully not stated by name but directly inferred, a lawyer...written permission to speak to a lawyer for a civilian who hasn't actually been charged with anything...

And we know, dear availees, that we supposedly need 'Written Permission' to speak to a lawyer, 'permission' to have legal representation, we know that as fact because of my willingness to challenge the extraordinary ICAC legislation, because of my letters about my trial, and as provided many times by me on this 'ere, my blog...(it's always 'me me me' with you-Ed)...yeah, and it's always 'me me me' when it's you, remember?...(orrr right, yeah, good point, I am a confected literary device, not an actual person-Ed)...well just so long as we both remember that...anyhoos, my mate Josh knows this stuff about 'permission for a lawyer' only because it's what I've exposed about the rankly Fascist corruption of the SA ICAC, and as 'published' here on TMGI, where he done read all about it...(I still reckon that's irony, and pure irony at that, layers of pure irony-Ed)...don't have the energy to argue with you mate, and you're probably right anyway...  

(Of course OurBAAIHSTIC Bruce's other response was to collude with Labor's Attorney-General li'l Johnny Rau to change ICAC legislation in a manner directly addressing the exact issues raised by those SECLS Leagle's letters-Ed)...say that 3 times fast...(changed the ICAC Act 2012 via the ICAC Miscellaneous Amendment Act 2014, including the addition of a specific definition of 'To Publish', etc-Ed)...exactly, meaning that what I have been 'convicted' of was not actually a crime for the 'Charge Period' of late 2013-April 2014...(wow-Ed)...and only when backed into a corner by media coverage of the ICAC MAA 2014 change of legislation, only then has Magistrate White finally and bizarrely acknowledged it, via an Addendum, where-in he blames me for not explaining it to him correctly, then dismisses it as irrelevant anyway, and 'Re-Convicts' me...(well hurrah, just like a real trial-Ed)...not really, no...  

And I am Nick Fletcher and this 'ere is my blog...and if I'm tellin' lies, if I'm actually bein' scurrilously libellous, then why is it that not one single person has actually engaged with me and held me specifically to account for those heinous mis-truths and devious deceits...(well except for all them threats what you done keep gettin'-Ed)...well yeah, sure, except for the over a decades-worth of 'Defamation Threats' from Bill DeGaris, the Education Dept, the Crown Solicitor, Piper Alderman lawyers on behalf of the Lutherans and St Martins Lutheran School, et al, but other than that...(well ICAC/SAPol did raid your home, 'steal' your laptop, persecute you for more than 3 years in the SA Magistrates Court, etc, and all for the apparently far more heinous crime of 'talking the truth about an alleged ICAC investigation'?-Ed)...mmm...(no-one's held you to account other than all those 'Defamation' threats, and your "bizarre trial"*-Ed)...well sure, but that's not 'Being Held To Account', that's just the standard Pro-Paedophile Political and Legal Retribution that you can count on receiving in South Australia, a Pro-Paedophile State run by a Pro-Paedophile Parliament, Police, Public Prosecutor, et al, with a Judiciary that is either compliant or complicit...                   (*The Border Watch March 2018)

I'll do Magistrate Teresa Anderson no favours by congratulating her on both her conduct of various cases prior to Troy Bell's, and of her conduct of my 'Trial'...I cannot reconcile how my 'Trial' started before the Constitutional Law issues were resolved, but Her Honour was definably under extreme external pressure to 'progress' my 'Trial' under whatevs circumstances, and at least HH treated me with respect and was absolutely scrupulous in her direction and conduct of my bit of 'Actual Trial' what actually happened aways back in November 2016...(ooo, HH ain't gunna' thank ya' for that-Ed)...the short bit before it collapsed in complete disarray on Day One when HH was forced to call another adjournment because SAPol Prosecutions were trying to change literally half of the 'charges'...(and the 'charges' weren't done propers either, multiple 'counts' in each 'charge' instead of one each-Ed)...yeah, and that, nearly 2 years at 'Trial' and the whole thing goes ping! Day One as SAPol Prosecutions tries to change a 'Charge Sheet' riddled with errors...farcically incompetent...

I'll mention just as routine, that that was only Day One, before the "Malicious Prosecutions"* shenanigans the next morning that saw Her Honour 'recuse' herself and the 'Trial' effectively stopped until recommencing in March 2017 with Magistrate White...    (*Her Honour's definition for my allegations of Politically Motivated Persecution) 

And sure, Her Honour and I, we did have a coupla' mildly terse exchanges because I kept correcting HH, but being an intelligent person, HH quickly realised that it was the deliberately false information that she was being handed by SAPol Prosecutions that was making her look foolish...and a coupla' times it really did, a coupla' times HH made statements of fact relying on the info provided by SAPol, and I made her look 'foolish' by correcting her...fortunately for me, those exchanges only illustrated exactly what I was saying about SAPol's conduct, etc, and HH knew exactly who it was making her look 'foolish'...and that indicates intelligence, a definable lack of bias, and a respect for the defendant...HH did not heap blame on me, and quite frankly, considering their continuous incompetence and deceits, etc, HH was remarkably patient with SAPol Prosecutions...

Her Honour did that again yesterday, where-in she acknowledged a defendant's genuine efforts to comply with Home Detention, albeit in a manner that partly contradicted/contravened HH's previous Orders, and therefore HH gave him 24 hours to secure further appropriate but alternate accommodation...again, it was the inappropriate intervention/actions/approvals of a third 'official' party that complicated the matter, placing HH right in the proverbial, and HH was quite reasonably 'disappointed' by that 'third-party intervention', but gave the defendant due credit and acted accordingly...don't know what exactly he has allegedly done, but the processing bit I saw by HH was absolutely 'fair' to the defendant...I went from frowning at this man's impending imprisonment for bail breaches, despite his efforts, to nodding agreement with what I considered to be almost exactly the appropriate outcome...

And I'll apologise to Troy Bell as well while we're all here being all nice and shizzle...(and why?-Ed)...because I've accused him of 'rolling over', but I was mis-spoken in my anger, he's 'been rolled'...(and there's a difference?-Ed)...a world of difference mate...we'll see how brave I am when and if the Crown Solicitor et al make good their numerous threats to gaol me for my supposed 'Defamationings' and/or 'Contemptings' ...it's one thing to show the bravery of staring-down vile threats one doesn't believe will be acted upon, it's another to be standing in the dock facing actual gaol time...(mmm, fair point, but you've been constantly threatened, for more than 15 years now, including Magistrate White's dozen+ threats about 'Contempt of Court' including his straight-out threat in Court, 1st February 2017, to have you "taken into custody", and that latest bizarre effort supposedly from the Crown Solicitor...mate, it takes something to just 'stare-down' that li'l lot-Ed)...touché Ed, fair point yourself, and cheers because I do take pride in what 'courage' I have shown, because I have been deeply concerned at times, as have peeps close to me, and not just for my freedom but also my safety...  

But just to close out this eclectic collection of vicious sniping barbs and drooling self-congratulation, it is truly remarkable to me that I have done these things, and yes I do have 'pride' in what I've done, yet achieving these things has also taken a massive toll on my Mental and Physical Health, Personal Relationships, etc...but know this, ah-hem...as per the bizarre 'anonymous' Crown Solicitor letter in recent posts, just check-out 2 things...firstly, the bit about "Unfounded allegations"...(but what you've said, anywhere, about any aspect of your 'Trial', it's all as accurate as can plausibly be expected of a non-lawyer who has been refused transcripts, etc, etc-Ed)...well that's my point mate, "Unfounded", I am confident that I have said only that which can be proven because I have stated only that which has happened...(back of the net!-Ed)...and furthermore...(ooo, you know how I love a "furthermore"-Ed)...when I'm being threatened with gaol, that means Legal Aid, and that means a lawyer, what I done get to choose...

(So what you're saying is, is that when others tell you how brave and intelligent and wonderful and whatevs you are-Ed)...and they do do that dear availees, increasingly if not yet frequently...(and you coyly wave away the praise, it's genuinely because of the sense of confidence and commitment rather than faux-humility-Ed)...indeed, but there's a certain very twisted reality where-in, if I do get done for supposed Contempt of Court, I get a cashed-up opportunity to legally address the extraordinary conduct of my entire 'Trial', and particularly of Magistrate White's appalling conduct toward me...and in my Angry Place, in that time and place, I want to be taken to Court for Contempt, because that would in effect be giving me exactly what I want...(so you're sayin', because there's gaol time possibly involved, that's what's threatened, that means you do get Legal Aid, and therefore a lawyer, to get a proper go at Magistrate White, on the record?-Ed)...exactly...(to address his constant threats without his constant threats?-Ed)...precisely...(I can see how you might come to linger in a place where you might want that-Ed)...as I said mate, an Angry Man sitting on his Angry Chair...

And see, now that's what I call irony, me being threatened by those who don't want to see happen exactly what it is they're threatening to make happen to me, give me my many days in Court to address my many days in Court...(as they challenge you to 'found' your supposed "allegations"-Ed)...nice, 'cos the only problem the Crown Solicitor et al will have with my "allegations", is that they are entirely 'found', I done found them, they were everywhere, all over the Courtroom floor, fallin' outta' my mailbox, pollutin' my emails thingy, everywheres I tells ya'!...(a big box of just 'Found'-Ed)...mate, I could open a bloody gallery with the collection of Found I got...(mmm, Arty reference, mmm, oh I've got one too-Ed)...enlighten us do...(well, with all the times you tried to 'Object' about the shizzle goin' down in your 'Trial', albeit to no avail-Ed)...yeahhhhs?...(well, we'll put all that 'Objects' shizzle with all the 'Found' stuff-Ed)...oh gourd no, if you s...(and have a 'Found and Objects' Exhibition-Ed)...you bastard...

Dear availees, but seriously, it's why the Crown Solicitor hasn't got the gumption to put his own name to his own threats...(and when challenged hides behind anonymous 'Reception'-Ed)...well indeed, hurl abuse and threats and intimidation and then run like shreck from any accountability...and we all know exactly what it's all really about...(St Martins?-Ed)...and it's ilk, yep,' cos it's not the only thing unfortunately, but in this instance, it is the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up, that is entirely exactly what all of this is all about...     

Anyhoos, as I mentioned previous, I'm Nick Fletcher and this is my blog...cheers and laters...   

Sixteen Years Of The St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up

Howdy y'all and welcome to a very subdued and even tired post, from a very tired ol' blogger...(mate?! tired?! I'm gunna' paraphrase a few availees and various randoms from the street, and say, 'how do you even function? at any level? let alone be vaguely coherent? let alone find genuine humour in life still? let alone then present that humour in balance with the many unpleasantness's what you done blog about?' and various other questions/statements to that effect-Ed)...indeed, and regular availees will be familiar with the June long weekend as being the deeply traumatic anniversary of the 'removal' of "text-book grooming paedophile" teacher Glyn Dorling from St Martins Lutheran School...(and hence the commencement of the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up-Ed)...well yes and no...

Technically, the Glyn Dorling/St Martins Cover-up was already well underway by June 2002, because the Lutherans were already 'protecting' him, for several years already, literally since they moved him to Mt Gambier (1998?) following "an incident" back in his former employ in a Lutheran school in Adelaide...(so, with the benefit of hindsight, the Glyn Dorling/St Martins Cover-up started even before his first week at St Martins, it started when he was moved?-Ed)...exactly, and continued first week at St Martins...(a first week that resulted in several complaints?-Ed)...correct, and how do we know about those complaints?...(because the then Principal John Alexander told parents?-Ed)...correct again, whilst waving-about a thick folder of alleged complaints about Dorling...

And it's one thing to welcome any anniversary as a celebration of whatevs, or a commemoration of whatevs, but this is just another year of the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up...and dear availees, if you read through this 'ere blog thoroughly, but then cannot make the connection for yourself, then I'm not sure what else it is I can say, and/or how I can say it...(and what is that connection, and to what is it connected?-Ed)...oh, right, yes, pardon, that the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up is the direct and fundamental motivation for the Pro-Paedophile Political Persecution of Nick Fletcher (Nick Fletcher-said often), which has manifested itself as a "Malicious Prosecution" (Magistrate Anderson-October 2016), via a massively corrupted "bizarre trial" (The Border Watch-4th March 2018), a trial that is-and-of-itself an instrument of the "Malicious Prosecution"...(yay-Ed)...

So, anyhoos, I'm thoroughly knackered and did none of what I said I would do in this 'ere letter/email attached below...I had intended to do exactly that, spend my entire long weekend grinding through the vastly corrupt nature of the entire "bizarre trial" process, but I am exhausted and entirely without energy for this shizzle...so here's what I wrote to the Courts Administration Authority, and their response...I've chosen to remove the name of the person I'm corresponding with...

(**name removed**)                                                                               6^th June 2018

Courts Administration Authority

Appeal Process re: MCMTG-15-72

Conviction - ICAC Act Section 56

Dear ********,

I refer to our previous correspondence about my Appeal Process re my 'conviction' for alleged breaches of the ICAC Act 2012/14, MCMTG-15-72.

As you are aware, I lodged my Appeal Application on 26^th April 2018, on the exact forms and in the exact manner I was advised over the phone by both the Courts Administration Authority and/or the Legal Services Commission, and that it took me two days of phone calls, accessing those forms via the library, then going to the Mt Gambier Courthouse only to be told I could not lodge my Appeal here because there is no Supreme Court Registry here, etc.

As you know, after being turned away from the Courthouse, I re-contacted and was further advised by the CAA and/or LSC that it was appropriate for me to submit my forms by email. Also, I was told there was no Lodgement Fee, but was then immediately called-back by the CAA to tell me 'sorry, there is a fee, but you can still email the forms, just post the cheque and your Appeal Application will be processed as soon as we receive it'.

It was you whom then contacted me to say that I had used the wrong forms and that I could not submit my Appeal Application via email because these are formal legal documents requiring an original signature, etc, and that they must be mailed.

I apologise for the delay in responding to your latest email of 16^th May 2018 but I have been extremely unwell and, as you are aware, have been denied Legal Aid funding and therefore have no access to any legal support or even advice, I am trying to do this by myself. As stated, my last attempt to gain appropriate advice via the CAA and/or LSC proved mildly disastrous, leading to our current correspondence.

Unfortunately, it is not possible to return to the South East Community Legal Service, because they have not had anything specifically to do with my “bizarre trial” (The Border Watch 4^th March 2018) since mid-2015, and the particular lawyer who was extremely helpful in 2015 and handled the Constitutional Law issues and wrote to ICAC Comm Lander, etc, now lives interstate.

Regardless, how is the current one-lawyer Community Legal Service supposed to suddenly correctly advise me on the Constitutional Law issues of a 3 year long “bizarre trial” that is the precedent prosecution of the equally bizarre ICAC Act Section 56, legislation that is not even meant to govern private citizens, nor was ever even defined in Court? I have been doing this for over 4 years and it would take me literally days to try to explain the length and breadth of my extraordinary case to a new lawyer.

Furthermore, I was not present for multiple hearings that involved discussion of the Constitutional Issues and have made many, many requests in Court for those transcripts, and most recently directly to Chief Magistrate Hribal, in writing, but have been effectively refused those transcripts, and therefore I have no way of explaining to anyone what happened in those hearings, and obviously do not know myself.

My Appeal Process will therefore involve continuing my efforts to be allowed the recordings and transcripts, because without them my Appeal Process is critically compromised, as was my entire trial, and to my understanding, for that reason, failure and/or refusal to provide me these transcripts is itself another Grounds for Appeal.

As you and the Court (Magistrate White, Magistrate Anderson, Magistrate Rice) are aware, and as ICAC Comm Bruce Lander and former Attorney-General John Rau and current AG Vicki Chapman, etc, are all aware, there was supposed to be a COAG-style meeting to ascertain whether or not this specific legislation and/or prosecution impinged on Constitutional Law, and that this meeting/ruling must take place before any trial commences.

I know about this meeting because it was explained in Court on 2^nd February 2016 by SAPol Prosecution's Ms Diamandi, and I do not understand how the Court and the State's Attorneys-General, particularly South Australia's (then) AG John Rau, have chosen to ignore it, including ignoring my multiple emails.

As all are aware, these Constitutional Law issues have not been resolved but my trial proceeded anyway, and that all of this is proven in the Court's own Certificate of Record, including where my trial was moved to Adelaide for several hearings specifically because of the identified Constitutional Law issues. When it was returned to Mt Gambier on 2nd February 2016, Magistrate Anderson, following Ms Diamandi's explanation, specifically 'Ordered' SAPol Prosecutions to;

“...attempt to see the actual constitutional law issue so the relevant Attorney General's

can be notified.” Certificate of Record - 2^nd February 2016

SAPol effectively ignored that 'Order' and the Constitutional Law issues were never resolved, and I therefore find myself currently stuck trying to define an Appeal Process, Grounds for Appeal, etc, in the Precedent Prosecution and therefore Precedent Appeal of undefined ICAC legislation, in appealing the outcome of a “bizarre trial” that legally never should have happened.

I note that Magistrate Anderson used the specific terms “Abuse of Process” and then “Malicious Prosecution” in legally defining my repeated assertions that the entire “bizarre trial” was a Political Persecution motivated by a desire to punish me for 1) doing my blog, The Mount Gambier Independent, and 2) my ongoing attempts to resolve the horrendous St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up.

Again, all of this is covered extensively in the Certificate of Record, recordings and transcripts, and associated Orders, and Reasons for Ruling, etc, of the various hearings involved, eg, Her Honour Anderson suddenly recusing herself mid-trial November 2016, directly in relation to my lengthy “Malicious Prosecution” submission.

You have referred to a '21 Day' time frame for lodging my Appeal Application, and I have done that, on 26^th April 2018, only 6 days after Magistrate White finally concluded his extraordinary multiple-hearing Verdict/Judgement process that started on 28^th February 2018, convened again briefly 16^th March, and finally concluded on Friday 20^th April 2018.

As covered above, when lodging my Appeal Application on 26^th April 2018 and thus commencing my Appeal Process, I did exactly what I was advised to do by the CAA and/or LSC, and am now having to resolve that situation. My Appeal Application was initially lodged on 26^th April 2018.

I am not a lawyer and therefore have no understanding of exactly how I should word my Appeal Application, but I am aware of the issue of not accidentally missing or mistakenly ruling-out a specific Grounds for Appeal, that is, whilst the failure to resolve the Constitutional Law issues are to my understanding immediate and obvious Grounds for Appeal, there are other multiple issues that I believe also constitute Reasonable Grounds.

For example, it is irrefutably the fact that, in direct response to my/SECLS letters, the ICAC Comm Bruce Lander and Attorney-General John Rau changed the ICAC Act 2012, via the ICAC Miscellaneous Amendment Act November 2014, specifically in a way so as to make prosecuting me possible. That is, I was raided and supposedly 'reported' by SAPol Anti-Corruption Branch on 7^th/8^th May 2014, and never formally 'charged' after that, so what I was 'convicted' of in April 2018 was not yet a 'crime' in May 2014, it was not a 'crime' until November 2014.

I admit that I do not understand the wording of several parts of the correct forms as you have identified and provided, thankyou for that, and there are several other issues as equally extraordinary as ignoring Constitutional Law and changing State Law, and I am very aware of not undermining myself by failing to correctly address all of these issues. Therefore, I will have to go through all this trauma and unpleasantness, again, in specific detail, in what will effectively be an expanded version of this letter.

I will have that statement done by the end of this June long weekend, 12^th June 2018, and will submit it as a formal Affidavit attached to the correct forms, correctly posted either that day or the next.

I appreciate your help and again apologise for the brief delay. I also apologise for any inference that the CAA and/or LSC are in any way part of the “Malicious Prosecution”, because I have found CAA/LSC staff, Sherriffs, etc, to be genuinely respectful and helpful, and as inconvenient as it might be, I believe those problems with forms, etc, were genuine and understandable mistakes from strangers to the case trying to advise over the phone, nothing more.

Yours,

Nick Fletcher

***...and I have had a response, which confirms that I did 'lodge a Notice of Appeal', on 26th April 2018, and as described above...***

Dear Mr Fletcher,

Thank you for your email.

I note that your attached letter makes reference to having lodged a Notice of Appeal on 26 April 2018, which was within the 21 days’ time limit.  As mentioned in a reply email from me on 26 April 2018 I indicated that the court requires an original signature document which means the court is unable to accept documents via email.  The Supreme Court has not received an original Notice of Appeal document as yet, nor has it received the filing fee/remission of filing fee application which means there is presently no live appeal.  When you are able to file a Notice of Appeal you will need to complete the section of the form that indicates you seek an extension of time to file.

Please let me know if I can be of further assistance.

Regards 

So there you go, that's what happened to my last week, last week...and whilst this email clearly acknowledges and confirms what I've been saying about my 'Appeal Process' thus far, as in my letter above, it also ignores many of the fundamental issues I've raised, eg, the critical issue of my being refused access to transcripts, particularly for those critical 'Constitutional Law' hearings, several of which were held in Adelaide and conducted in my absence, etc, this issue which fundamentally stymies any attempt to progress my 'Appeal Process'...how am I meant to address issues that I do not have any experience/knowledge of?...(let alone in a context where this is a Precedent Appeal Process of the Precedent Prosecution of the bizarrely undefinable Section 56 of the South Australian ICAC Act 2012/14-Ed)...well indeed, where do I go for an example of what should or shouldn't be included, what's important, etc, etc? it doesn't exist yet because I'm still doing it now...

I completely reject the contention that "there is presently no live appeal."...I have 'Appealled', exactly as I was directed to do, I don't need "an extension of time to file.", and now it's down to trying to negotiate back from that wholly erroneous advice from the CAA and/or LSC, back through forms that, in places, I do not understand the specific legal language of, and in the above context, where there is no Precedent Appeal Process to refer to because I'm it and it's currently happening now!...

Please note, their name is removed because I'm trying to keep balanced, even in a context where I have clearly proven that every aspect of my "bizarre trial" is deeply corrupted and 'Pro-Paedophile' motivated, etc, etc, but for all I know, the person from the CAA is likely just some vaguely decent person just trying to do their job, and they are clearly not responsible for either the St Martins Cover-up or any of the subsequent shenanigans...(what about the threats from the Crown Solicitor?-Ed)...pardon?...(the latest threats from the CSO, claiming to be 'acting for the CAA after they complained to us', that stuff covered in recent posts?-Ed)...ah yes, sure, I don't know but do not believe that this person is responsible for those 'threats', in fact, I don't believe that those threats are anything more than that, threats...(I notice you haven't mentioned those CSO threats in this letter to the CAA-Ed)...sure, for the exact reasons just explained, separate issue, and likely not this person's actions and/or responsibility...I will pursue that bizarrely anonymous CSO letter, maybe it is this person who responds, whatevs... 

Tomorrow: Liberal's Tony Pasin, His Part In The St Martins Cover-up

I can only promise that it's going to a very long, long week about and/or for various people associated with the St Martins Cover-up...

I am Nick Fletcher and this here is my blog, and the fact that it exists at all is a screeching indictment of what we are as a community, what we allow as a community, and apparently we allow the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up...cheers and laters...

More threats

Howdy Estonia, Bangladesh, Netherlands and Colombia, and here's one of the letters I found recently whilst looking for the Crown Solicitor's 'Threat Letters' from 2005/06...(whilst rescuing from an avalanche of paperwork you mean-Ed)...indeed Ed, it is somewhat symptomatic of my 'exhaustion' that I still haven't re-sorted paperwork dragged-out and jumbled together during the past 12-15 months...(don't see the point? can't be bothered?-Ed)...indeed, bit of both and one leads into the other...I've run into the same issues with trying to progress my 'Appeal Process'...(having trouble trying to engage with a wholly corrupt System from which you quite rightly expect nothing but more rancidly corrupt conduct and bias and abuse and threats as they continue to Politically Persecute you, a "Malicious Prsoecution" motivated by the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up?-Ed)...very succinctly put Ed...(the St Martins Cover-up that reaches it's 16th anniversary this June long weekend-Ed)...indeed Ed, where's my Court/Appeal process ever going to be appropriately resolved in a State so Pro-Paedophile Corrupt?...

So here's a letter from former Labor Minister Stephanie Key...please note that it identifies that other parents have already contacted her, meaning that she knows the Lutherans are already acting to 'Cover-up' the gross abuses committed by "text-book grooming paedophile" teacher Glyn Dorling against our 7-year old kids, abuses committed daily in the classroom at St Martins Lutheran School...(but if she knows/knew that the Lutherans were 'Covering-up' those abuses, why would she send you back to those rancidly Pro-Paedophile Corrupt criminals?-Ed)...Language Warning:...well exactly Ed, it's a straight-out 'Fuck You Parents' from a rancidly Pro-Paedophile Corrupt Labor government, effectively one lot of Professional Paedophiles protecting other Professional Paedophiles...End Language Warning...



Please also note that this letter was already 16 months after the June 2002 'removal' of Glyn Dorling, and over 6 months into the stalled Teachers Registration Board/Crown Solicitor Inquiry into Dorling, an Inquiry that eventually commenced on June 1st 2004, an Inquiry that only happened because us parents forced it, a TRB/CSO Inquiry that was so Pro-Paedophile Corrupt that it exonerated Dorling on his evidence that the kids were forcing themselves on him and he couldn't stop them...(what a pack a' corrupt bastards-Ed)...indeed Ed, how sickeningly Pro-Paedophile Corrupt is this sad, sick State we call home, where-in the Lutherans and the TRB and the CSO and SAPol (police), et al, conspire to protect a "text-book grooming paedophile", and do so by attacking parents of the abused children...which brings us to the latest Pro-Paedophile threats I've had flung my way by the gutless, corrupt shrecks in the CSO... 

And here's the email response I received late afternoon on 21st May 2018, after I had posted that morning about my unanswered letters/emails of the previous Wednesday 16th May 2018...regular availees will be well aware of the various questions asked in my letter/email and it's there in recent posts...(the stuff about 'how do I remove stuff if you's at the CSO haven't even identified it?', all that stuff?-Ed)...indeed, so here's the CSO's response to those questions...(but this anonymous 'Receptionist' hasn't answered your questions-Ed)...indeed, and why is an 'Anonymous Receptionist' responding on behalf of the Crown Solicitor, let alone in such an important case...

Dear Mr Fletcher,

I refer to your email sent to this office on 16 May 2018. I confirm that the attached letter dated 9 May 2018 was sent to you by this office. It is standard practice that letters of advice prepared by solicitors engaged in the Crown Solicitor’s Office are written in the name of the Crown Solicitor.

                Yours faithfully,

Reception
Crown Solicitor's Office

   

And because this 'ere is my blog and it is my life and I for one am sick and tired of me constantly gettin' threatened and attacked by South Australia's Rancidly Pro-Paedophile Corrupt Authorities, here t'is a concise dissection of the umpteen threats from that recent bizarre anonymous letter claiming to be from the Crown Solicitor...I remind dear availees that my attempts to verify the veracity of this ludicrous missive...(by writing to the CSO Mr Wait and to SA's (Liberal Party) Attorney-General Vicki Chapman?-Ed)...yep, that be they, well those letters generated a deafening silence from my mate Vicki, and that further bizarrely anonymous response from the CSO 'Reception'...

Threat One: CONFIDENTIAL - if you print this on your damn blog, ooo, will you be in big trouble or what Mister!
Threat Two: "I act for..." - I'm a lawyer and this is a lawyer letter, and you are currently or about to be dragged into Court, again, by me;
T3: "...may amount to contempt of court." - a general threat, riding in on the back of the perpetual Contempt of Court Threat as made at/to me by Magistrate White at literally every hearing of my corruptly "bizarre trial";
T4: "A finding of contempt..." - just straight-out threatens to 'fine and/or imprison';
T5: "The purpose of this letter is to warn you..." - should just read 'to threaten you';
T6: "I caution..." - is a threat;
T7: "...this warning letter..." - is another;
T8: "...subsequent proceedings..." - again threatens Court action;
T9: "...you have been warned..." - apparently I've been warned;
T10: "...seek legal advice." - because you're going to be in Court again;
T11: "On behalf of my client..." - I'm a lawyer and you're going to Court again, again;
T12: "...contents of this letter are not to be published without the permission of the CAA." - book-ending with another vacuous threat to try and stop me doing exactly what they know I'm gunna' do...

And so there you go, at least a dozen specific 'Threats' in an anonymous CSO letter that is itself just one long threat...and so here's a coupla' those other threats from aways back in 2005/06...there's a coupla' other letters in between these two, but these give a good indication of both the time frame and the attitude of the CSO...first letter straight-out threatens me, second one applies the more subtle techniques, eg, 'I'm not your lawyer, but...' and the straight-out but very politely worded threats about "criminal defamation" and "criminal liability", etc, etc... 

So there ya's go, deliberately misrepresenting and trying to discredit the issues I raised, with ridicule and dismissive abuse about how I don't know 'cos I ain't no lawyer with no fancy book-learnin's, and all served with a nice assortment of threats, to the parent of an abused child...that folks, that is your/our Crown Solicitor, rancidly Pro-Paedophile Corrupt...

Tomorrow:  Bringin' The Big Angry

I am Nick Fletcher and I am a very, very angry man, at certain times, and in my own gentle ways, but this 'ere remains as always the best way to deal with it, this 'ere being my blog...cheers and laters...