(Post Script Preface:...straight-up set-out to do a post purely about good ideas, that was gunna' be the original title, then got bogged-down in explaining why none of those ideas are gunna' happen, and, well, the rest is what comes next)
(PSP II:...'cos started this post several days ago and this article and cartoon were in The Sunday Mail yesterday and resultantly in TMGI Facebook. Apologies, can't get link to load but just go to TMGI Facebook page to post dated 25 October 2026)
I know we've most of us all heard most of this before, and that title's a strenuously tenuous attempt at a bad pun, but it does say exactly what it means...it asks a question and answers it, at least in part...what has the Farcical Aquatic Recreation Centre (Wulanda) cost, in all senses of that word...(and all the tenses-Ed)...indeed, in the Past, the Present, and well on into the Future...(perhaps we're being a bit too esoteric/vague, perhaps this is more of a summation paragraph than an intro-Ed)...well let's start quickly at the beginning and skim our ways to the good ideas stuff...(good idea-Ed)...and see, we're away all ready...
FARC In The Past:...was a deceitful manipulation of Ratepayers by Mt Gambier City Council...not my opinion, not a 'version of events', but what's been fact-backedly presented previously on this 'ere blog, our related TMGI Facebook page, and indeed, across various 'Local Social Media'...(and we, as always, say what we say with the confidence of someone who was there and/or has the documents, etc-Ed)...indeed, for example, it's a fact that MGCC repeatedly stated officially/publicly that the FARC would cost "$39.1million"...we all know this, we were all there, we all saw/heard this, not once, not twice, but over and over and over..."$39.1m"...(still got the glossy brochures-Ed)...it's a fact that MGCC then frog-boiled that up to their Declared Actual Cost of $63m...("$63m"? but going through the relevant MGCC Budgets, we put actual construction at just shy of $80m?-Ed)...indeed we did, and that is also a fact...
During the 'Vested Interests Drive-by Masquerading As MGCC Public Consultation' phase (2018), front and centre was the (then) MGCC CEO Mark McShane, constantly pushing the project..."we'll never get to apply for this funding again", "borrowing rates are really low so we must do it now", "the city is dying" (economically), "the obesity epidemic", and/or "the young have nowhere to go"...(and of course that time honoured classic, "Mt Gambier deserves it"-Ed)...yeah yeah, serve after generous serve of open deceit and emotional bullying...(washed-down with all the faux civic-pride gaslighting you could want-Ed)...yummmmy...(and who can forget that ol' favourite, "your Rates won't go up"?-Ed)...well not us, that's for sure!...and equally hilariously, it was Member for Barker Tony Pasin himself who publicly stated "if we miss out this year, no problem, the funding is available every year", and "MGCC can raise Rates to cover costs"...(maaate, you couldn't invent this shizzle-Ed)...and thanks to MGCC, we don't have to...(nah, we just need to point at that which already Is, and ask the One True question, WTAF?-Ed)...indeed, but we digress... (*These are "quotes" from local media, eg, ABC SE Radio)
I went through those MGCC Budgets and landed somewhere just on $75m, but likely nearer $80m...I can't be more specific than that 'cos MGCC Budgets are deliberately constructed to be as confusing and impenetrable as possible, eg, changing Line Item nomenclature so it's near-impossible to follow...(a fact proven by The Blue Lake Briefing room when they did 7-8 long posts about it-Ed)...fair dues though, BLBR didn't allege any deliberate wrongdoing by MGCC...(yeah, but they did identify exactly this stuff about changing Line Items and using different formulas concurrently and mismatched figures, etc, and how that made it near-impossible to decipher/determine what 'The Budget' was-Ed)...okay, that is all factually accurate, BLBR had a red-hot crack at deciphering MGCCs' latest 'Budget'...(multiple cracks, BLBR multi-cracked it-Ed)...and eventually 'gave-up' in the context that 'giving-up' was not a failure, but a hard-earned decisive conclusion that without a word says everything about how MGCC conduct themselves...
It is fact that it has been repeatedly alleged to me that the actual Final Construction Cost was above $100m...(it may well be that there's many $$$m in MGCC Budgets that have been spent on the FARC but are not specifically identified as such-Ed)...as also repeatedly alleged to me, and that I part-identified within the Budgets I looked at...
To be crystal clear, I have had extensive conversations with several people who had direct involvement/knowledge, and I believe what has been said to me is accurate/informed, but it remains merely here-say as regards my knowledge of it...so that $100m+ figure is one I believe to be correct/true, but I can't say it as fact...I can say as fact that when I went through The Budgets, I calculated just shy of $80m...it is fact that MGCC says $63m...apologies for being so pedantic and now suddenly digressing, but, well, just gotta' give a quick nod to The Googles and their new Updates to the Blogger Content Policy...just read through it, understand most of it sort of or at least a bit...some of the wording is quite open to 'interpretation', eg, what actually constitutes behaviour/content justifying removal of content...I guess we'll see...having said that, might just say this...
Dear The Googles,
I am as always, always and in all ways endeavouring to be conspicuously accurate, just 'cos what I'm saying (on this wonderful free service/platform you provide) is unpleasant/uncomfortable/inconvenient for some, does not make it untrue or less important. Obviously I'm very much aware of the many approaches made to you to remove content, eg, the several 'Post Unavailable' issues with early posts due to 'Complaints' and 'Defamation' threats, etc, made by various lawyers. 'Dear Google: In His Own Words, Here's How Bill DeGaris Deceives And Manipulates You' is a post I wrote/published on this platform/blog on 11th April 2018 about these exact issues re what constitutes 'appropriate' and 'defamatory', etc, and it's still relevant. Yours, Nick.
(It's the no1 most viewed post on this 'ere blog-Ed)...sorry what?...(that post about Bouncin' Billy DeGaris, him threatening "defamation" action, in writing, several times, why he was doin' that, etc-Ed)...yeah yeah, I was there...(sure, it's the most read post-Ed)...is that a fact?...(indeed 'tis-Ed)...well I don't mind a bit of flagrant self-promotion, and it is worth a quick read if ya' inclined and haven't already, so, here's the link...
https://themountgambierindependent.blogspot.com/2018/04/dear-google-in-his-own-words-heres-how.html
It is fact that when MGCC were still in the pre-construction approval phase...(but still telling Ratepayers "$39.1"-Ed)...yeah...(with all the bells and whistles-Ed)...well with all the pools and courts, sure...at that stage MGCC lodged their 'Planning Approval Application', which is a 1-page form, and it has a Line Item that says Cost (Not including Fixtures and fittings) then a box for said figure...(and in that box the (then) MGCC CEO Andrew 'Peddle To The' Meddle wrote "$40m"-Ed)...indeed he did...at the time MGCC were telling Ratepayers it's gunna' be a Bonza Big Buildin' with Bulk Bathing Bizzo and Beaut Basketball Bits...(yeah, that's exactly how they said it, those exact words, I was there-Ed)...settle down...not those exact words, but certainly whilst sayin' it's gunna' be the whole kitten-caboodle for $39.1m, MGCC were simultaneously lodging an official form stating '$40m for The Box'...(mon dieu! sans cloches et sifflets?!-Ed)...yep, no bells and/or whistles, just The Box, $40m...(c'est impossible! 'ow can you make with the playing of the basketballs sans cloches et sifflets?!-Ed)...why are you doing that outrageous French accent? you're not fooling anybody, stop it at once...it is a fact that I wrote to the Development Commission about this cloches et sifflets discrepancy; also a fact that they dismissed this deceit of Ratepayers as being 'not of our concern'...
Onion Cutting Debt:...("Onion Cutting"?-Ed)...oh, I meant Eye-Watering...(sure-Ed)...and it's actually more like, ummm, remember that time I was cutting chilli, and touched my eye...(oh yeah, and you were in the bathroom jamming a bar a' soap into ya' eye socket-Ed)...yeah that...(good times, good times-Ed)...well what MGCC have done to MG Ratepayers with the FARC Debt, that is some jalapenoed eyeball, time-shifting, full-blown pan-dimensional Matrix-glitchin' shizzle goin' on right there...it is at once The Past, The Present, and The Future...it is a done deal; that money has gone; the OCD is...(it's alive! it's aliiiiiiive!-Ed)...that is The Past and it cannot be undone...(I'd imagine even a fully independent professional Audit wouldn't be likely to recover any of that cost/expenditure-Ed)...whatevs...the OCD manifests in The Present as multiple huge loans totalling $40m-$50m, incurred in The Past, but very much affecting The Present, and wholly dominating The Future...
FARC In The Present:...has first and foremost the OCD repayment issues, with the added bonus of running at a massive loss, yay...(which was predicted in that MGCC 'Business Plan' document, best case scenario with Maximum Predicted Attendance, etc, Operational Loss of $1m per annum-Ed)...but currently far exceeding that, power costs alone are reportedly around $1m pa...(strewth-Ed)...I've heard it described less politely...(I bet-Ed)...and another MGCC lie, another promise broken, 'your Rates won't rise to pay for this'...(well, however MGCC try to dismiss/deny it, and even ignoring the Operational Losses, ya' can't just crank-up the borrowing by $40m-$50m and try to argue that it's irrelevant re recent massive Rate increases-Ed)...oh they can try, my how they've tried...(and how's that working-out for them, with the Ratepayers I mean?-Ed)...yeahhh, nahhh, not so good...
So if you add the Operational Costs, the Loan Repayments, and Depreciation, that reportedly runs to $5million, give or take...(and what is the actual Income? surely that drags that figure back a bit-Ed)...as I understand it, that final $5m 'loss' figure is a final figure, with Income included...(wow, and what about Belgravia, did we ever find-out exactly what it is they do, how they get reimbursed, etc?-Ed)...at this time, I do not claim to understand what in the livin' shreck is goin'-on there...(wasn't it first reportedly 'profit sharing'?-Ed)...well no, at first it was claimed that Belgravia were paying MGCC to be allowed to run the FARC, I believe it was about $13,000 per month...(well hang on, how were Belgravia goin' to operate it at a profit if they were paying MGCC, and MGCCs' own 'Business Plan Modelling' predicted a $1mpa loss?-Ed)...great question, it's why it just never made sense...(then it was 'profit sharing'?-Ed)...possibly, briefly...I believe that MGCC has since 'clarified' this confusion by confirming that MGCC pays Belgravia to manage the FARC...again, don't quote me on the current actual set-up/contract 'cos I don't know, you'd have to ask MGCC...
And that 'Depreciation' is basically what the asset, the FARC itself, loses in it's value due to wear-&-tear/time, etc etc whatevs, but does not allow for the Construction Cost vs Actual Market Value reality of the FARC...(sooo, if we believe that MGCC spent $63m, and I don't, but just let's say, was the final asset ever worth that?-Ed)...indeed, 'cos any differential is an immediate loss, let-alone re figures of nearly $80m, and the alleged $100m+...(and of course with a massive facility like this that relies on strong patronage, running at a loss despite MGCC alleging 'wonderful patronage', that lowers the value of the 'asset' even further-Ed)...and in there somewhere is an Event Horizon where it becomes effectively worthless/unsaleable...
Again, I have to acknowledge that I do not know all of the details, I cannot state with any certainty just exactly what is happening re the operation of the FARC, and/or the exact figures/sums involved...(not least of all 'cos MGCC go to great lengths/depths to keep those figures opaque and better yet officially hidden-Ed)...indeed, so what I've presented here are accurate figures as reported at the time...(so the current issue, management aside, regardless of whom is running what, the figures are MGCCs' own and as reported in local legacy and/or social media, etc, yeah?-Ed)...spot on...(and Ratepayers are the ones' with their collective neck in the fiscal noose to the tune of about $5m a year-Ed)...and in a context where that debt payment component mostly if not entirely addresses Interest Payments, and there is minimal if any actual drawdown on the capital of the loan...(so where's the money coming from to cover that interest payment?-Ed)...not entirely sure, obviously relentless successive massive Rates increases covers some of it, some other revenue streams get diverted, eg, Dog Registration fees, and likely more borrowing, but again, I wouldn't claim to know the exact sources/numbers...
Point being, it's all Ratepayers' income and also all Ratepayers' debt, the FARC is Ratepayers' asset, so Ratepayers have a right to know exactly what all those sums/figures are...
FARC In The Future:...is effectively just a re-hashing of the Debt issue, the Loan Burden on Ratepayers due to MGCCs' egregious borrowing frenzy to pay for the FARC...(all that, and with the added bonus of the chilling/crippling effect this debt has on any future plans for Mt Gambier-Ed)...be those ideas good, bad, and/or indifferent...(they've all got the same snowballs' chance in the fiscal furnace that is the FARC?-Ed)...yep, next paragraph...(hang on, our "good idea for the future of Mt Gambier" is 'it doesn't have a future'?-Ed)...if you'll let me finish Roger...(what? who are you talking to?-Ed)...very last paragraph we'll give a very quick Good Ideas Synopsis, and conclude with the observation that possibly Private Enterprise could get involved, but, who knows...
So, at what cost the FARC? In the past it has cost at least $80m, likely well North of that, and it currently costs approx $5mpa to run, and on into the future the cost/interest repayments/debt will completely compromise any plans/desire for major projects...(for several/many decades to come-Ed)...yay...it is the brutal reality right in everybody's face...(and in their Rates Notice-Ed)...well quite...
The Good Ideas:...in dot point format, some of which we've already discussed on TMGI Facebook page...
1) 7-day Public Transport with suitable shelters/access/signage, running 0800hrs to 1900hrs on weekdays;
2) 4WD Golf-buggy Shuttle to/from Centenary Tower in Xmas School Holiday/Tourism period;
3) Daily bus to Pt MacDonnell and return in Xmas School Holidays (6-8 trips), with shuttle to/from Browns Beach (possibly run by District Council?);
4) 'See-through' semi-submerged observation pontoon in Blue Lake, accessed via Aquifer Tours, attached to current SA Water Extraction Pipes;
5) Low-rise cafe facing Blue Lake on area immediately behind current Aquifer Tours (former) Cafe Kiosk.
6) Working Artists + Gallery & Centralised Bus terminus at fully-renovated Old Rail Station.
That'll do for now and in no particular order, but if I had to prioritise, I've put Public Transport first, then both shuttle services 'cos they're relatively cheap and easy to organise/run...I believe that MGCC should operate these 'cos they already have the requisite support staff/infrastructure/insurance/etc...
Tomorrow:...The Sun Comes Out, Apparently.
Thanks for your patronage today, and one final word, just in case, about 'Ed'...(oh here we go-Ed)...'Ed' is as always a confected literary device used to create dialogue/discussion and set-up jokes, etc...TMGI is written as a sort-of play thingy with 2 main protagonists...(well at least I get equal billing-Ed)...couldn't do it with oucha'...
I am Nick Fletcher and this is my blog, cheers and laters...










