How's Keeping Housekeeping Help?...because it allows me to do lí'l catch-up stuff like this...remember recently that a bunch of posts just disappeared off this 'ere blog?...(the ones that completely disappeared, including from the Draft section of this 'ere blog?-Ed)...that be they...(and without any of the regulation 'Noticfications' from The Googles?-Ed)...that's right...(and you identified that SAPol (police) still have your laptop and can therefore access the internal control panel of this 'ere blog?-Ed)...exactly...(and then immediately after making that identification, the pro-paedophile corrupt 3rd-Rate B-Grade lawyer Bill DeGaris, himself a critical player in the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up, he suddenly sent you threatening letters suddenly claiming responsibility?-Ed)...yes mate, all that stuff...(and then you re-posted most of the 'disappeared posts' that you had managed to save properly?-Ed)...mmhmm, yep...(and what's happened there then?-Ed)...those 'replaced posts' remain...(now there's another surprise-Ed)...indeed...
It has been long-established that these clowns are all reading this 'ere blog, especially my mate Billy, and yet the same posts that The Googles supposedly 'removed' supposedly because they're supposedly somehow inappropriate and Billy supposedly complained, etc, those 'replaced posts' have now been back on the blog for several months and remain there...(but why hasn't Billy mate complained again?-Ed)...indeed...(and if The Googles saw fit to pull them down in the first instance, 1) why haven't you received those Standard Procedure Notifications, and 2) why haven't those posts just been removed again?-Ed)...great questions Ed...(I mean, it really starts to look like a Third Party has 'hacked' this 'ere blog, and most likely SAPol who have the laptop, and that when outed on this 'ere blog, they've conspired with Billy to get him to try to take responsibility-Ed)...indeed Ed, as ludicrous as that sounds, it remains the one fundamentally rational explanation...and for all I know, Billy is still continuously bleating to The Googles, but they've got wise to his lies and deceits and manipulations, and are quite rightly sick of him and his corruption...
Regular availees will also be well familiar with the rancidly corrupt Pro-Paedophile work of the Crown Solicitor as evidenced in their rank betrayal of me and the other parents involved, and of my child and all the other kids, and by application, every child and every parent in this sad sick Pro-Paedopohile State...y'all will recall that the CSO 'ran' the rankly corrupt Teachers Registration Board Inquiry (March 2003-November 2004) into "text-book grooming paedophile" teacher Glyn Dorling from St Martins Lutheran School...it is irrefutable that the CSO colluded openly with the TRB and Dorling's lawyer Stephen Lieschke to protect Glyn Dorling, the Teacher's Union rep at St Martins, and there's another reason why...the TRB panel were all Teacher's Union members...(and Dorling's lawyer in the TRB, Stephen Lieschke, he's the business partner of our recent Labor ex-Premier Jay Weatherill-Ed)...indeed, the Premier's partner for a lawyer, and a panel of fellow Unionists...
That CSO/TRB Inquiry started after parents contacted the TRB in February 2003 and the TRB claimed ignorance of the 'removal' of Glyn Dorling in June 2002...Jen Olsson and Brian Rowett of the CSO interviewed some parents in May/June 2003, told us we wouldn't need lawyers because they were our lawyers in that Inquiry, and then it all just stopped for a full year, before the actual CSO/TRB Inquiry started proper in Adelaide on 1st June 2004, had 7 hearings across the next 6 months, before completely exonerating Dorling in mid-November 2004...(why have an Inquiry and what did they look at for 21 months, if they were just gunna' exonerate him?-Ed)...to pretend to do an Inquiry whilst deliberately stuffing us parents about and traumatising us, etc, as they colluded to protect Dorling...I remind availees that the CSO/TRB exonerated Dorling on the strength of his evidence that 'the kids were forcing themselves on me and I couldn't stop them'...(wow-Ed)...
Regular availees will remember that when I/parents pursued the CSO for their outrageous betrayal in the CSO/TRB Inquiry, I/we were openly and repeatedly threatened, including letters that I've previously posted, letters that are remarkably similar to this one above, eg;
1) from Greg Parker, January 2005, multiple threats about 'defamation' concluding with, "I warn you not to repeat these allegations"...get stuffed Greg...
2) my mate Greg again, February 2005, "...you run the risk of being sued for defamation if you persist...";
3) and Simon Stretton, November 2006, "The allegations achieve nothing except to expose you to potential civil and criminal liability", which is a very polite threat about gaoling me...get stuffed Simon...
...and these are just snippets from entire letters of carefully worded intimidation and straight-out threats...
Language Warning:...from a very, very angry man who is sick and tired of being threatened and abused and attacked by the rancidly Pro-Paedophile Corrupt institutions of the South Australian government, and particularly the rancidly corrupt CSO...**insert rancid abuse here, give it all ya' got and then some**...(and the horse you rode in on!-Ed)...that's the idea Ed, and End Language Warning...so here t'ís...
(Wow-Ed)...absolutely, wow...and so problematically absurd that others were cautioning me that this was a 'fraudulent document'...(I can see how they might think that, that letter is a farcical nonsense! how the shreck do you remove stuff that hasn't even been identified, and even then is only 'possibly' Contempt of Court?-Ed)...well quite...(this entire letter is just a straight-out albeit vacuous threat, another act of gross cowardice and corruption from the CSO!-Ed)...indeed it is Ed, a dozen 'threats' from rankly corrupt cowards, and yet further evidence of the rank Pro-Paedophile Corruption that contaminates the Crown Solicitor's Office...and so I wrote to the latest Crown Solicitor, Michael Wait, seeking both confirmation and clarification...and it goes a li'l something like this...
Crown Solicitor Michael Wait Wednesday 16th May 2018
Level 9, 45 Pirie St
Adelaide SA 5000
Email: CSO-Business
Services@sa.gov.au
Dear Mr Wait,
I have received via
post a bizarrely incoherent letter claiming to be from you, stating
that you “act for the Courts Administration Authority” after “It
has come to the attention of the CAA” that my blog, The Mount
Gambier Independent, allegedly “contains material that may amount
to contempt of court.”
This letter does not
appear to be on 'official' Crown Solicitor stationary, the letterhead
looks very odd, and the contents are a vague and threatening
nonsense. It makes a series of thinly-veiled threats, demanding that
I remove “material” from my blog, but that 'material' is not
identified. This is self-evidently ridiculous; how does one remove
any material from any source if that “material” is not
identified?
The letter repeatedly
contradicts itself, stating as fact and demanding that I remove the
allegedly contemptuous but unidentified “material”, but then also
repeatedly using the word “may”, eg, the statement in it's
opening paragraph, as above, “may amount to contempt”, then again
“may result”, then “suspects you may be responsible”, “may
be adduced”, etc. Again, this is self-evidently ridiculous;
demanding the removal of 'unidentified material' because it 'might
be' contemptuous.
The letter then makes a
series of threats about “fine or imprisonment”, “this letter is
to warn you”, “I caution you”, “this warning letter”, “you
have been warned”, “You may...wish to seek legal advice”, “the
contents of this letter are not to be published”, etc, including
three threats in one line “this warning letter may be adduced in
evidence in any subsequent proceedings to show that you have been
warned”. The letter concludes with a further bizarre threat about
me requiring permission from the CAA to publish it's contents.
This letter is written
so incompetently that I find it impossible to believe that it was
written by a qualified lawyer, let alone by yourself, the Crown
Solicitor; it is a clumsy and unambiguous attempt to threaten,
harass, bully and intimidate me.
The most obvious
concern is that the letter is not signed, it concludes with a “CROWN
SOLICITOR Per:”, then a one-loop scribble, but no actual name. At
best, this states that it is your letter as written and/or directly
approved by you, but I am advised that this is a key indicator that
there is “something very wrong” with this letter. It has also
been explained to me how easy it is with modern technology to create
a very realistic but fraudulent 'official document'.
Please immediately
confirm or deny the veracity of this bizarre and threatening
anonymous letter that claims to be from you.
Yours,
...(and that also went to Attorney-General Vicki Chapman?-Ed)...indeed it did, mate, shortly after I sent it to the CSO...(and Michael Wait's response?-Ed)...didn't get one, not Wednesday, not Thursday, not Friday, no answer, just the original 'automated response'...then I briefly posted about this on Monday morning (21st May 2018) and bingo, whatta' ya' know, I get an email that arvo, and here t'is...
Dear
Mr Fletcher,
I
refer to your email sent to this office on 16 May 2018. I confirm
that the attached letter dated 9 May 2018 was sent to you by this
office. It is standard practice that letters of advice prepared by
solicitors engaged in the Crown Solicitor’s Office are written in
the name of the Crown Solicitor.
Yours faithfully,
Reception
Crown Solicitor's Office
Level 9, 45 Pirie St Adelaide SA 5000
P: (08) 8207 1720 | F: (08) 8212 6161
Crown Solicitor's Office
Level 9, 45 Pirie St Adelaide SA 5000
P: (08) 8207 1720 | F: (08) 8212 6161
Attorney General Vicki
Chapman
Wednesday 16th May 2018
45 Pirie St
Adelaide SA 5000
email:
Attorney-GeneralsDepartment@agd.sa.gov.au
Dear Ms Chapman,
I refer to my email to
you of 19th April 2018, where-in I provided you a copy of
my 7-page letter (19/04/18) to Chief Magistrate Hribal, outlining the
extraordinary “Malicious Prosecution” I have been subjected to in
the SA Magistrates Court, and most particularly the outrageous and
abusive conduct of Magistrate Ian White. I am yet to receive a
response or even an acknowledgement from you/your office.
As per my previous
letter, this “Malicious Prosecution” was instigated at the direct
behest of ICAC Comm Bruce Lander, who unilaterally referred the
matter directly to SAPol (police) Anti-Corruption Branch, without any
investigation by ICAC, and that at some time and somehow in
mid-February 2014 this matter bizarrely became 'Operation Baritone'.
As you are aware,
ICAC/SAPol 'Operation Baritone' is solely about me and in sole
reference to my alleged 'crime' of blogging (about an alleged ICAC
investigation of Mt Gambier City Council, but as proven non-existent
in Court). You are also aware that 'Operation Baritone' has allegedly
just somehow appeared (January/mid-February 2014), and that in Court
both ICAC and SAPol have claimed ignorance of it's inception, both
unable and/or deceitfully refusing to provide any explanation and/or
paperwork as to how it came into existence.
Her Honour Hribal
emailed me a one paragraph letter that afternoon, 19th
April 2018, copy attached, effectively denying any responsibility and
indicating that if I pursue the matter of Magistrate White's
appalling behaviours, I will end-up back with the Judicial Conduct
Commissioner, Bruce Lander, the public official who is responsible
for this “Malicious Prosecution”.
Now, I have received a
bizarre letter claiming to be from the Crown Solicitor, dated 9th
May 2018, received 14th May 2018, copy attached. Please
also find attached my letter to Crown Solicitor Michael Wait, dated
today 16th May 2018, requesting verification of the
veracity of the letter 9th May 2018.
Has this letter come
from the Crown Solicitor? If so, it is an outrageous and brazen
series of threats, an act of outright abuse, intimidation, and
harassment, from a public official directly under your authority. Is
this a genuine Crown Solicitor letter? And if so, did this happen
with your approval?
Please respond
immediately because it is extraordinarily concerning that someone may
be acting to 'impersonate' the Crown Solicitor, and it is equally
concerning should this bizarre letter prove to be genuine. Please
also respond to the many issues raised in my letter of 19th
April 2018, particularly the specific legal issues of 'Constitutional
Law' that should have been resolved before my 'trial' even commenced.
Yours,
Tomorrow: More CSO Pro-Paedophile Corruption
Just gunna' re-post some of the CSO's threats and abuse in those letters from aways back in 2005/06, as partly quoted above...after that I'll get onto the other stuff about the documents that went to Chief Magistrate Hribal, eg, the stuff we recently posted from Parliament's Hansard and from the ICAC website that proves that after I'd been 'raided' by SAPol ACB in May 2014, etc, they conspired to change ICAC legislation in November 2014, specifically to allow me to be prosecuted...(just hilarious-Ed)...indeed...
I am Nick Fletcher and this is my blog, and it's now 4 years since SAPol Anti-Corruption Branch raided my home, seized my laptop, etc, May 7th/8th 2014, and we rapidly approach the 16th anniversary of the June 2002 long weekend removal of "text-book grooming paedophile" teacher Glyn Dorling from St Martins Lutheran School in Mt Gambier...cheers and laters...
No comments:
Post a Comment