Tuesday, May 29, 2018

European Law Changes Acknowledged By TMGI

Howdy y'all dear availees in The Europes, and here's a quick acknowledgement of the notification we all here at The Mount Gambier Independent recently received about changes to your laws about 'data collection' and 'consent', etc...(well just let them read it for themselves-Ed)...ahhh, sure, ummm, here t'is...and just in case I didn't notice, this notice was/is on the 4 main pages, that is, the Draft Page, the Statistics Page, etc...as I say, here t'is, as pasted directly across... 

***European Union laws require you to give European Union visitors information about cookies used and data collected on your blog. In many cases, these laws also require you to obtain consent.

As a courtesy, we have added a notice on your blog to explain Google's use of certain Blogger and Google cookies, including use of Google Analytics and AdSense cookies, and other data collected by Google.

You are responsible for confirming this notice actually works for your blog, and that it displays. If you employ other cookies, for example by adding third party features, this notice may not work for you. If you include functionality from other providers there may be extra information collected from your users.

Learn more about this notice and your responsibilities.***

So there you go...now, Dear Availees, s'far as I am aware, the only 'Data Collection' that I'm doing is what The Googles do for the Statistics Page for this 'ere blog, and that only includes generic 'Blogger Topics' that cover Country, Post Name, etc, and isn't traceable back to the availee...(well not by us anyways-Ed)...well indeed, the only info I have is that available to me through the Blogger Topics/Statistics Page, but I cannot vouch for what The Googles and/or any other non-permitted players may do...admittedly I ain't gone to "Learn more" just yet, but I have checked with my Tech Support and apparently I don't "employ other cookies" and/or any other sort of 'data collection'...(and we ain't advertising nuthin' neither-Ed)...well indeed...

I'm not exactly sure where that leaves me with the whole 'informing availees', other than that's exactly what I'm doing here with this 'ere post...(well at least trying to do-Ed)...well indeed, so here's me, Nick Fletcher...(and Me, Ed-Ed)...saying that TMGI 1) acknowledges that I/we received that Euro Law notification, 2) that I/we am/are passing-on that acknowledgement to dear availees of this 'ere blog, and 3) to state that I ain't collecting anybody's anything nor have any intention of doing so...

(Just checked 'Learn more" and I reckon we might just leave that 'Official Google Notification' right there where it is until we get further 'Tech Support advice-Ed)...erring on the side of caution?...(well indeed, The Googles reckon everyone's gotta' be notified, etc, and their own notice identifies what they're doing, so best to just leave it there and acknowledge that we all at TMGI at least are trying to do and/or are doing what we're supposed to do-Ed)...and if we need to modify/notify anybody of anything further, we'll get right on it right here...(exactly-Ed)...sounds like a plan...

Tomorrow: More Mt Gambier City Council Stuff, Yay.

I am Nick Fletcher and this is my blog, and apparently it's read in a coupla' places in The Europes, so's cheers and laters to y'all... 


Thursday, May 24, 2018

Why Nick Fletcher Says The South Australian Crown Solicitor Is Pro-Paedophile Corrupt

Howdy Turkmenistan, Poland, Turkey, and Aotearoa (New Zealand), and a big TMGI howdy to y'all else...apparently, a coupla' people are a bit miffed that I refer to Mt Gambier's Political and Social Elite as being 'Pro-Paedophile' and effectively 'A Paedophile Ring', but yet again it's a discussion about me being had in my absence...(well there's a surprise!-Ed)...anyhoos, anytime anyone wants to discuss this with me, I'm more than happy to verbally dismantle you with the Rancid Realities...and Mt Gambier's hardly an isolated case, eg, last post I concluded with a paragraph about a bizarre and threatening but unsigned letter, claiming to be from the Crown Solicitor's Office, what I done receive by post on Monday 14th May 2018...after posting about that, I have received a 'response' from the 'CSO Reception'...but first...

How's Keeping Housekeeping Help?...because it allows me to do lí'l catch-up stuff like this...remember recently that a bunch of posts just disappeared off this 'ere blog?...(the ones that completely disappeared, including from the Draft section of this 'ere blog?-Ed)...that be they...(and without any of the regulation 'Noticfications' from The Googles?-Ed)...that's right...(and you identified that SAPol (police) still have your laptop and can therefore access the internal control panel of this 'ere blog?-Ed)...exactly...(and then immediately after making that identification, the pro-paedophile corrupt 3rd-Rate B-Grade lawyer Bill DeGaris, himself a critical player in the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up, he suddenly sent you threatening letters suddenly claiming responsibility?-Ed)...yes mate, all that stuff...(and then you re-posted most of the 'disappeared posts' that you had managed to save properly?-Ed)...mmhmm, yep...(and what's happened there then?-Ed)...those 'replaced posts' remain...(now there's another surprise-Ed)...indeed...

It has been long-established that these clowns are all reading this 'ere blog, especially my mate Billy, and yet the same posts that The Googles supposedly 'removed' supposedly because they're supposedly somehow inappropriate and Billy supposedly complained, etc, those 'replaced posts' have now been back on the blog for several months and remain there...(but why hasn't Billy mate complained again?-Ed)...indeed...(and if The Googles saw fit to pull them down in the first instance, 1) why haven't you received those Standard Procedure Notifications, and 2) why haven't those posts just been removed again?-Ed)...great questions Ed...(I mean, it really starts to look like a Third Party has 'hacked' this 'ere blog, and most likely SAPol who have the laptop, and that when outed on this 'ere blog, they've conspired with Billy to get him to try to take responsibility-Ed)...indeed Ed, as ludicrous as that sounds, it remains the one fundamentally rational explanation...and for all I know, Billy is still continuously bleating to The Googles, but they've got wise to his lies and deceits and manipulations, and are quite rightly sick of him and his corruption...

Regular availees will also be well familiar with the rancidly corrupt Pro-Paedophile work of the Crown Solicitor as evidenced in their rank betrayal of me and the other parents involved, and of my child and all the other kids, and by application, every child and every parent in this sad sick Pro-Paedopohile State...y'all will recall that the CSO 'ran' the rankly corrupt Teachers Registration Board Inquiry (March 2003-November 2004) into "text-book grooming paedophile" teacher Glyn Dorling from St Martins Lutheran School...it is irrefutable that the CSO colluded openly with the TRB and Dorling's lawyer Stephen Lieschke to protect Glyn Dorling, the Teacher's Union rep at St Martins, and there's another reason why...the TRB panel were all Teacher's Union members...(and Dorling's lawyer in the TRB, Stephen Lieschke, he's the business partner of our recent Labor ex-Premier Jay Weatherill-Ed)...indeed, the Premier's partner for a lawyer, and a panel of fellow Unionists...

That CSO/TRB Inquiry started after parents contacted the TRB in February 2003 and the TRB claimed ignorance of the 'removal' of Glyn Dorling in June 2002...Jen Olsson and Brian Rowett of the CSO interviewed some parents in May/June 2003, told us we wouldn't need lawyers because they were our lawyers in that Inquiry, and then it all just stopped for a full year, before the actual CSO/TRB Inquiry started proper in Adelaide on 1st June 2004, had 7 hearings across the next 6 months, before completely exonerating Dorling in mid-November 2004...(why have an Inquiry and what did they look at for 21 months, if they were just gunna' exonerate him?-Ed)...to pretend to do an Inquiry whilst deliberately stuffing us parents about and traumatising us, etc, as they colluded to protect Dorling...I remind availees that the CSO/TRB exonerated Dorling on the strength of his evidence that 'the kids were forcing themselves on me and I couldn't stop them'...(wow-Ed)...

Regular availees will remember that when I/parents pursued the CSO for their outrageous betrayal in the CSO/TRB Inquiry, I/we were openly and repeatedly threatened, including letters that I've previously posted, letters that are remarkably similar to this one above, eg;
1) from Greg Parker, January 2005, multiple threats about 'defamation' concluding with, "I warn you not to repeat these allegations"...get stuffed Greg...
2) my mate Greg again, February 2005, "...you run the risk of being sued for defamation if you persist...";
3) and Simon Stretton, November 2006, "The allegations achieve nothing except to expose you to potential civil and criminal liability", which is a very polite threat about gaoling me...get stuffed Simon... 
...and these are just snippets from entire letters of carefully worded intimidation and straight-out threats...

Language Warning:...from a very, very angry man who is sick and tired of being threatened and abused and attacked by the rancidly Pro-Paedophile Corrupt institutions of the South Australian government, and particularly the rancidly corrupt CSO...**insert rancid abuse here, give it all ya' got and then some**...(and the horse you rode in on!-Ed)...that's the idea Ed, and End Language Warning...so here t'ís...


(Wow-Ed)...absolutely, wow...and so problematically absurd that others were cautioning me that this was a 'fraudulent document'...(I can see how they might think that, that letter is a farcical nonsense! how the shreck do you remove stuff that hasn't even been identified, and even then is only 'possibly' Contempt of Court?-Ed)...well quite...(this entire letter is just a straight-out albeit vacuous threat, another act of gross cowardice and corruption from the CSO!-Ed)...indeed it is Ed, a dozen 'threats' from rankly corrupt cowards, and yet further evidence of the rank Pro-Paedophile Corruption that contaminates the Crown Solicitor's Office...and so I wrote to the latest Crown Solicitor, Michael Wait, seeking both confirmation and clarification...and it goes a li'l something like this...

Crown Solicitor Michael Wait                                                         Wednesday 16th May 2018
Level 9, 45 Pirie St
Adelaide SA 5000
Email: CSO-Business Services@sa.gov.au

Dear Mr Wait,

I have received via post a bizarrely incoherent letter claiming to be from you, stating that you “act for the Courts Administration Authority” after “It has come to the attention of the CAA” that my blog, The Mount Gambier Independent, allegedly “contains material that may amount to contempt of court.”
This letter does not appear to be on 'official' Crown Solicitor stationary, the letterhead looks very odd, and the contents are a vague and threatening nonsense. It makes a series of thinly-veiled threats, demanding that I remove “material” from my blog, but that 'material' is not identified. This is self-evidently ridiculous; how does one remove any material from any source if that “material” is not identified?

The letter repeatedly contradicts itself, stating as fact and demanding that I remove the allegedly contemptuous but unidentified “material”, but then also repeatedly using the word “may”, eg, the statement in it's opening paragraph, as above, “may amount to contempt”, then again “may result”, then “suspects you may be responsible”, “may be adduced”, etc. Again, this is self-evidently ridiculous; demanding the removal of 'unidentified material' because it 'might be' contemptuous.

The letter then makes a series of threats about “fine or imprisonment”, “this letter is to warn you”, “I caution you”, “this warning letter”, “you have been warned”, “You may...wish to seek legal advice”, “the contents of this letter are not to be published”, etc, including three threats in one line “this warning letter may be adduced in evidence in any subsequent proceedings to show that you have been warned”. The letter concludes with a further bizarre threat about me requiring permission from the CAA to publish it's contents.

This letter is written so incompetently that I find it impossible to believe that it was written by a qualified lawyer, let alone by yourself, the Crown Solicitor; it is a clumsy and unambiguous attempt to threaten, harass, bully and intimidate me.
The most obvious concern is that the letter is not signed, it concludes with a “CROWN SOLICITOR Per:”, then a one-loop scribble, but no actual name. At best, this states that it is your letter as written and/or directly approved by you, but I am advised that this is a key indicator that there is “something very wrong” with this letter. It has also been explained to me how easy it is with modern technology to create a very realistic but fraudulent 'official document'.

Please immediately confirm or deny the veracity of this bizarre and threatening anonymous letter that claims to be from you.

Yours,

...(and that also went to Attorney-General Vicki Chapman?-Ed)...indeed it did, mate, shortly after I sent it to the CSO...(and Michael Wait's response?-Ed)...didn't get one, not Wednesday, not Thursday, not Friday, no answer, just the original 'automated response'...then I briefly posted about this on Monday morning (21st May 2018) and bingo, whatta' ya' know, I get an email that arvo, and here t'is...

Dear Mr Fletcher,

I refer to your email sent to this office on 16 May 2018. I confirm that the attached letter dated 9 May 2018 was sent to you by this office. It is standard practice that letters of advice prepared by solicitors engaged in the Crown Solicitor’s Office are written in the name of the Crown Solicitor.

                Yours faithfully,

Reception
Crown Solicitor's Office
Level 9, 45 Pirie St Adelaide SA 5000
P: (08) 8207 1720 | F: (08) 8212 6161

...so there you have it...and imagine my surprise that this gutless and dismissive response that doesn't address any of the issues I've raised with the CSO, this 'response' is also anonymous, and not even from the supposed 'solicitor' who wrote this embarrassing crock-a-shizzle, but from an anonymous 'receptionist'...I rang the CSO on Wednesday morning (16th May) and was told I'd be called back within 10 minutes, told by a woman who went 'oh, that's unusual' when I put it to her that this dubiously stupid letter was unsigned...still waiting for that return call, but don't need it now...an hour later (on 16th May) I emailed the Crown Solicitor directly...(and the Attorney-General Vicki Chapman?-Ed)...indeed, and it's taken the CSO more than 3-full working days to come-up with this latest piece of anonymous dross from 'Reception', not even from 'the anonymous solicitor'...(and still no response from our mate Vicki?-Ed)...nup...so here's that letter too...

Attorney General Vicki Chapman Wednesday 16th May 2018
45 Pirie St
Adelaide SA 5000
email: Attorney-GeneralsDepartment@agd.sa.gov.au

Dear Ms Chapman,

I refer to my email to you of 19th April 2018, where-in I provided you a copy of my 7-page letter (19/04/18) to Chief Magistrate Hribal, outlining the extraordinary “Malicious Prosecution” I have been subjected to in the SA Magistrates Court, and most particularly the outrageous and abusive conduct of Magistrate Ian White. I am yet to receive a response or even an acknowledgement from you/your office.

As per my previous letter, this “Malicious Prosecution” was instigated at the direct behest of ICAC Comm Bruce Lander, who unilaterally referred the matter directly to SAPol (police) Anti-Corruption Branch, without any investigation by ICAC, and that at some time and somehow in mid-February 2014 this matter bizarrely became 'Operation Baritone'.

As you are aware, ICAC/SAPol 'Operation Baritone' is solely about me and in sole reference to my alleged 'crime' of blogging (about an alleged ICAC investigation of Mt Gambier City Council, but as proven non-existent in Court). You are also aware that 'Operation Baritone' has allegedly just somehow appeared (January/mid-February 2014), and that in Court both ICAC and SAPol have claimed ignorance of it's inception, both unable and/or deceitfully refusing to provide any explanation and/or paperwork as to how it came into existence.

Her Honour Hribal emailed me a one paragraph letter that afternoon, 19th April 2018, copy attached, effectively denying any responsibility and indicating that if I pursue the matter of Magistrate White's appalling behaviours, I will end-up back with the Judicial Conduct Commissioner, Bruce Lander, the public official who is responsible for this “Malicious Prosecution”.

Now, I have received a bizarre letter claiming to be from the Crown Solicitor, dated 9th May 2018, received 14th May 2018, copy attached. Please also find attached my letter to Crown Solicitor Michael Wait, dated today 16th May 2018, requesting verification of the veracity of the letter 9th May 2018.

Has this letter come from the Crown Solicitor? If so, it is an outrageous and brazen series of threats, an act of outright abuse, intimidation, and harassment, from a public official directly under your authority. Is this a genuine Crown Solicitor letter? And if so, did this happen with your approval?

Please respond immediately because it is extraordinarily concerning that someone may be acting to 'impersonate' the Crown Solicitor, and it is equally concerning should this bizarre letter prove to be genuine. Please also respond to the many issues raised in my letter of 19th April 2018, particularly the specific legal issues of 'Constitutional Law' that should have been resolved before my 'trial' even commenced.

Yours,

...and there you have that, ongoing official abuse, harassment, threats, and intimidation of Nick Fletcher, all in the name of continuing the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up...(well done Crown Solicitor-Ed)...and I can hardly be accused of not trying either, because whilst there may be days go by without posts on this 'ere blog, behind the scenes I'm still gouging away at these rancidly corrupt Public Institutions like the Crown Solicitor, and my only defense, my only hope is to blog this stuff so that at least some others will be aware of what's being done to attack and threaten and silence me, an agenda we like to call The Pro-Paedophile Political Persecution of Nick Fletcher... 

Tomorrow: More CSO Pro-Paedophile Corruption

Just gunna' re-post some of the CSO's threats and abuse in those letters from aways back in 2005/06, as partly quoted above...after that I'll get onto the other stuff about the documents that went to Chief Magistrate Hribal, eg, the stuff we recently posted from Parliament's Hansard and from the ICAC website that proves that  after I'd been 'raided' by SAPol ACB in May 2014, etc, they conspired to change ICAC legislation in November 2014, specifically to allow me to be prosecuted...(just hilarious-Ed)...indeed...

I am Nick Fletcher and this is my blog, and it's now 4 years since SAPol Anti-Corruption Branch raided my home, seized my laptop, etc, May 7th/8th 2014, and we rapidly approach the 16th anniversary of the June 2002 long weekend removal of "text-book grooming paedophile" teacher Glyn Dorling from St Martins Lutheran School in Mt Gambier...cheers and laters...

Monday, May 21, 2018

Just More Corruption Stuff

Howdy to Belarus, Ecuador, Canada, and United Arab Emirates, and to y'all else, welcome to TMGI...just a shortish post about moi, because I've still gotta' post all the documents that went with the previous post...(the one about your most recent letter to SA's Chief Magistrate Hribal?-Ed)...yep...(strewth, that is a doozy-Ed)...and apparently you ain't the only one what thinks that, but I wanna' quickly address this stuff...

Thankyou:...you know who you are...you are the people who have stopped me in the street, have been happy to be seen talking with me in public, have been polite and respectful and even concerned...just the other day I happened upon a 'senior public official type' and we strolled and chatted and shared a mutual joke where-in they lamented lacking my "notoriety", to which I responded that could "borrow some of mine, 'cos I got plenty"...(ahaha, I see what you've both done there, they praisingly acknowledged the elephant in the room by referring to the giant grey mouse that is your 'notoriety', and you've countered with self-deprecating pride about being the big moose with the thick hide who feels like he's that elephant in every room in this town-Ed)...Ed! that is possibly the most eloquent and insightful thing you've ever said, mind if I use it?...accept/acknowledge being the big beastie in the room and then take pride in being it...

And because I can take genuine pride in standing my ground despite the relentless torrent of personal vilification and legal and political abuse and corruption that I have been deliberately subjected to, because I've held my ground, it's no longer me feeling confronted by these people when I encounter them, it's not me looking at the ground or over there, etc...it was years of being subjected to this public abuse and vilification in the street/supermarket/wherevs that fuelled my descent into the Agrophobia stuff, eg, multiple incidents with senior Lutheran employee Cherylanne Perryman, not least of all in front of my child...(yeah, she's a class act ol' Cherylanne-Ed)...and sure, it would be ludicrous to say that I'm suddenly better, and recent behaviours indicate that's not the case, and I am admittedly also just 'exhausted', etc, etc, blah blah blah, but it's a fundamental shift in my own responses to certain people that I take enormous pride in and succour from...

It's a shift from self-blame and doubt, etc, to a position of belief in proven realities...and it's never been a case of having to 'hold myself back' in a physical sense, I'm just not like that, in fact, it's partly because I don't have that 'option' that I've taken-on huge amounts of anger and guilt over particular issues...(St Martins?-Ed)...particularly that, sure, but just questioning my own behaviours in general...(is this the 'Lack of Self-Esteem' stuff we've discussed in early posts, eg, 'Self Esteem - The Issue I'd Love To Have'?-Ed)...yeah, all that stuff...but it's very different now, where-in I'd be personally confronted by the presence of certain people, probably word them-up about whatevs issue they're involved in, and at very least I'd get emotionally wound-up about it and go home and stew-over stuff, etc...but things have changed...

More and more these days I find myself passing gently through these sort of encounters, even though they are encounters hard to avoid in a small town...it is the foundation of accountability and that resultant conflict, etc, that has slowly built an un-challengeable foundation on which I can stand my ground, to the extent that now I don't need to say a word, just need to look at them...(and sometimes not even that-Ed)...indeed, just need to be in the room, to be that elephant, to cause all manner of consternation...(it's why Mt Gambier City Council have conspired with a deeply corrupt Magistrate White to have you effectively banned from MGCC Meetings via that rankly corrupt 'Suppression/Intervention/Restraining Order'-Ed)...indeed it is Ed, a classic example of the Institutionalised Pro-Paedophile Corruption that defines South Australia, and the problems this 'ere blog is causing that Institution...for example...

Still waiting for the rankly corrupt pro-paedophile alleged lawyer Bill DeGaris to make-good his years of vacuous threats that he's gunna' come get me for speaking the truth about his atrociously corrupt conduct, as covered in recent posts about the threatening letters from his office and my responses, etc...(where-in Billy straight-out repeatedly threatens you, but then refuses to meet you and sort this all out via an 'In Camera' (recorded) meeting at his office in the SERDE Building?-Ed)...that's the stuff...(including the pathetic threats about 'Defamation' and 'Concerns Notices' and then refusing to act on those threats?-Ed)...exactly...(but then concluding with more vague threats-Ed)...text-book Billy bullying and cowardice, hide behind someone else and make vacuous threats...come on Billy mate, let us to be gettin' it on mate, let's show everyone the reality of your atrociously corrupt behaviour...(well I'd suggest that his own appalling letters full of vacuous threats, and refusal to meet you, etc, that all proves that reality already-Ed)...excellent point Ed...  

Also, been listenin' to the ABC and Mt Gambier Mayor Andrew Lee was recently on, spewin' spurious misinformation about the push for this '$40m Indoor Sports Complex', and all the good gear about ANZAC Day, etc, and it is frustrating and even maddening, because it's all just completely disingenuous from a man who is intimately involved in ripping-off Ratepayers, just another corrupt Member of the rankly corrupt Mt Gambier City Council...(well not just any old 'another', he is Mayor, he's the one organising these rancidly corrupt Ratepayer funded junkets to China to further his own business interests, etc-Ed)...indeed, as exonerated by the apparently equally corrupted Ombudsman Wayne Lines, who allegedly investigated Mayor Lees multiple lies and deceits and failures to declare business interests and/or income, etc, etc, all referred to him by ICAC Comm Bruce Lander after MGCC supposedly reported their own Mayor, etc...(and then Wayne, mate, made the extraordinary observation that 'I can understand how Mayor Lee's behaviour may appear corrupt to people in Australia'-Ed)...sure, followed by 'he has gone very close to crossing that line', etc, etc...another farcical pantomime where-in corrupt public officials report themselves to the rancidly corrupt ICAC, knowing they will get exonerated...it's how SA ICAC operates... 

All Aboard The Gravy Train:...and this is the stuff that just punches all my buttons, and will do the same for many others who know the connections between particular people, and in such a small town is in many circumstances unavoidable...eg, just channel surfin' on Sunday arvo coupla' weeks ago, when I happened upon one of these SA-promo TV shows, SA Weekender, and it was a story mostly about singer Louise Adams, starting at her 'favourite' cafe in Mt Gambier, which happens to be owned by a member of Tourism Mount Gambier, the self-appointed but Ratepayer funded 'Tourism Group'...a long promo for that cafe was followed by her 'second fav', the Centenary Tower, but showed spliced footage where they were driving along pointing to the tower, then cut to a shot of the tower, then back to the car...it made it look like you can just drive-up to/past the tower, which is actually several hundred very steep metres from the nearest carpark...it went on to mention/show Umpherston Sinkhole and Engelbrecht Cave, and then went to Louise's husband's winery, where they were dining with my mate Kirby Shearing...(omg-Ed)...exactly...and concluded with a promo for Tourism Mount Gambier and Louise...

This program was a vehicle for a handful of 'mates' to cross-promote, and a fascinating study in the nepotistic functioning of these various bodies...I remind availees of the deliberate, cynical and rank corruption I witnessed in the Mt Gambier City Council meeting that voted to hand $160,000pa of Ratepayer's money to Tourism Mt Gambier...(are you allowed to talk about that stuff now?-Ed)...sorry?...(can you talk about that extraordinary MGCC Budget Meeting because of these extraordinary 'Suppression Orders' from Magistrate White?-Ed)...well mate, 1) those 'Orders' are currently 'under Appeal', or at least I've tried to start that process, see recent posts, but 2) because I'm not a lawyer so I'm not sure, I'm still very specifically not identifying that 'Suppressed Person' and/or their specific conduct in that meeting, and 3) it's about the conduct of the entire Mt Gambier City Council who were present for that extraordinarily corrupted 'debate' and then voted to provide that funding, and 4) beyond that, it's a further illustration of the ludicrous nature of these entirely unproven and unsupported and deliberately undefined 'Suppression/Intervention/Restraining Orders'...       

Who Ordered The Censorship With A Chip On The Shoulder?...Magistrate White has made these 'Restraining/Intervention/Suppression Orders' without any supporting documentation, justification, and/or explanation...particularly, there is no explanation as to why my 'Charges/Conviction' relating to 'talking about an alleged ICAC investigation' should result in Restraining Orders that stop me going near people...no explanation, just whack!, there ya' go...this Restraining Order aspect is a deliberate attack on me personally, to infer of me problematic behaviour that simply doesn't exist, ie, these people need to be protected from me...I've never been anywhere near these people's homes, or threatened them, or done anything other than hold them to account for their definable and rancid corruption, and most particularly how they relate to the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up...these rankly corrupt 'Orders' are yet a further manifestation of the Political Persecution of Nick Fletcher, a persecution that Magistrate Anderson officially described as "Malicious Prosecution" (Oct 2016)... 

But I digress...on the following Monday I was momentarily stunned to hear my other mate time Biddie Tietz/Shearing mentioned...unfortunately I didn't hear much of it and didn't recognise the voice until it was over and the ABC South East said, 'that was Biddie Shearing, Tourism Officer for the Limestone Coast Local Government Assoc'...(omg, again-Ed)...yep, from Regional Development Australia Tourism Officer to LCLGA, and following on from the as yet still unresolved debacle with her 'original position' with that 'Tourism Group' that was supposedly operating for multiple local Councils, but was actually fraudulently ripping them off...just another example of a rankly corrupt person being protected by their mates, then promoted to various Publicly Funded positions despite their definable incompetence and/or corruption...it's the exact situation that occurred with my mate Grant King and the collapse of Green Phone, with $$$millions just 'disappearing', but no investigation...

The exact same thing has happened with Biddie (Tietz) Shearing and her 'Tourism' career, rankly corrupt conduct leading to collapse of her first 'position', but no investigation what-so-ever, then appointed to Regional Development Australia, where-in her very first act was to hand $140,000 to her personal friend Kent Comley of 'The Barn', etc, and now it's Limestone Coast LGA...Grant King de-frauded $$$millions from Green Phone, then was appointed by the rancidly corrupt Labor government to both the rankly corrupted RDA and the equally dubious Health Advisory Council...I feel absolutely confident in identifying these rancidly corrupt people and their Nepotistic employment histories because that is why they got those jobs, Corrupt Jobs need Corrupt People...(take the MGCC CEO position, it requires someone at least as corrupt as Greg Muller to keep that corrupt gravy train on the rails, and in Mark McShane, they've found their corrupt man-Ed)...spot on Ed, all of these positions are perpetually self-defining as 'Corrupt', and ironically it's the corruption of those appointed that defines those positions as 'Corrupt'...(mmm, corruption was never more hilarious I'm sure-Ed)... 

Welcome To Your First Slice Of Crunch:...regular availees will remember no doubt the hilarious MGCC meeting that I posted about aways back in 2013, where-in there were 2 motions regarding the Main Corner, one of which was in 'Exclusion of Public' at the end of the meeting...(is that the one where several Councillors had to leave because of their 'Conflict of Interest' issues, including Cr Des Mutton who's son Lachlan was the 'Main Corner/Town Hall Leasee', but Des only left after you pointed to him, and Cr Harfield was forced into the Big Chair as 'Acting Mayor', and they were crackin' jokes about not having a quorum*?-Ed)...yep, and here comes The Crunch...(and then they crunched those numbers and it wasn't quite so funny anymore because so many had left due to 'CoI' issues that they didn't have a quorum and therefore the 'Motion' collapsed and they all traipsed back in?-Ed)...indeed, and Biddie was one of those who stepped-out because her hubby Kirby was 'involved with a cafe', yet when I was booted-out for the 'Exclusion of Public' Motion at the end, Biddie remained in the Chamber to vote...     (*quorum- enough Members to vote)

And of course I cannot prove it, because I was excluded and it's all super-secret, but I believe that that second Motion was when MGCC transferred the Main Corner/Town Hall Lease from Lachlan Mutton to Sam Rothall, and as corruptly nepotistic as that process was/is, Biddie remained in the Chamber for that vote, in direct contravention of the Conflict of Interest she herself identified just previous...and it's because I've personally witnessed and even influenced so many of exactly these sort of deeply corrupt incidents that I've been banned from attending meetings...(it's because this is how Mt Gambier City Council functions, in it's entirety, and because there's only one place you'll read these gob-smacking realities, namely, right here on this 'ere blog-Ed)...well exactly...which runs naturally into the rankly Fascist benality of 'banning me' when I already have such a Deep Pool of Realities that I can dip into because I've been to just so, so many MGCC meetings...

And I know this post is all a bit dis-jointed, but it's all still relevant in the broader scheme of things, outlining the structures of Institutionalised Corruption that undermines our community, resulting in horrendous situations like the St Martins Cover-up...I'm gunna' pull stumps here and move onto the next post, and hopefully that'll be a little more coherent...      

Tomorrow: More Court Document Stuff

Fell off my chair laughing to hear new Liberal Attorney-General Vicki Chapman bangin'-on about 'ICAC and the need to protect journos about their use of confidential info', etc...this from the person who won't even acknowledge my emails about the rancidly corrupt ICAC Persecution I'm being subjected to...and on that note, it was 18 months ago that someone contacted me claiming to be liaising with Vicki about my ICAC stuff...(and?-Ed)...still waiting, and no response to recent emails...(well that sums it up nicely-Ed)...indeed, so apologies to those genuine people who have tried to contact me but I haven't responded, don't want to drag you into my shizzle, but beyond that, I'm sick of hearing about how so-and-so is doing such-and-such, whilst nothing happens...  

Also, last Monday 14th May 2018, received a truly bizarre threat-laden letter claiming to be from the Crown Solicitor, claiming to be acting on behalf of the Courts Administration Authority...("claiming"?-Ed)...yep, I've had multiple Threat Letters from the CSO, particularly relating to their rankly corrupt involvement in the St Martins Cover-up, but this letter is so bizarre that even others I've shown have questioned it's veracity...the 'letterhead' is not quite right, the language is extraordinarily unprofessional and deliberately vague, but it threatens me repeatedly about undefined 'Contempt of Court' issues, demanding I remove unidentified material from this 'ere blog, etc, whilst repeatedly using the word 'warn/warned/warning'...but the ultimate concern is that it ain't signed, it's got a 'CROWN SOLICITOR  Per:' with a one-loop scribble, but no actual name...I contacted both the CSO and Vicki Chapman about this bizarre correspondence on Wednesday 16th April, but thus far, no response apart from auto-responses to say those emails were received...similarly, no response at all from Vicki to my letter of a month ago...

This supposed CSO letter also has bizarre threats attached about how it's "Confidential" and I'm supposedly not allowed to discuss any of it unless I get permission from the CAA...as I say, it's such a problematic letter that others have questioned it's origin/veracity, and my unanswered attempts to verify/clarify would seem to confirm that there is "something very wrong" with this letter...

I am Nick Fletcher and this isn't my best post but this is my blog and I'm still trying...cheers and laters...


Sunday, May 13, 2018

Documents For Previous Post - Letter To Chief Magistrate Hribal

Howdy dear availees, and here t'is some documents/letters/whatevs that were attached to my letter to Chief Magistrate Hribal, emailed 19th April 2018, and responded to that very day...(that very day you say?-Ed)...indeed I do say that to you...(by Chief Magistrate Hribal?-Ed)...yup...(well hurrah, aren't we the special one then?-Ed)...have you read that response?...(ahh, not yet, is that it there just below?-Ed)...indeed it is mate, and dear availees who haven't yet read my 7-page letter to CM Hribal, perhaps please to be goin' back to check that out first, because otherwise, when I go bat-crap crazy about this response, right there just below this letter below, well, if y'all haven't read my letter...(your own response is gunna' look bat-crap crazy-Ed)...spot on...


And sorry to disappoint y'all, but I simply don't have the energy or inclination to waste anymore of my life/time on getting 'upset' about this sort of extraordinary denial of responsibility...perhaps I'm lost in the vast Reality of what is happening here, but I could swear that my letter carefully explains the deeply complicit, duplicitous and openly corrupt conduct of My Bestie And Also In His Spare Time ICAC Commissioner Bruce Lander, and the specifically definable leading role he has played in the rankly corrupt application of SAPol and the Courts, etc, etc, etc, in this unambiguously retributional persecution of li'l ol' me, etc, etc, dear regular availees, you know that story...(and so does CM Hribal-Ed)...indeed, yet here again I'm being sent back to him, loitering under one of his many other hats, namely, as Judicial Conduct Commissioner...(although it does vaguely sort of allude to what you've said, "given it's previous history."-Ed)...vague is a very polite way of putting it...(yeah, but that right there is an official acknowledgement that there are problematic issues that do need to be addressed-Ed)...damn you Ed, well spotted, that's exactly what that says...(cheers-Ed)...issues involving Bruce that need to be addressed by Bruce, well done mate....

(And does this also mean Her Honour can "intervene" now?-Ed)...sorry what?...(well I assumed that HH answered immediately because to leave it until the next week or even morning would make redundant her denial of responsibility about 'it's still before the Court'-Ed)...possible I s'pose, but even then the letter indicates that if I choose to "maintain (my) complaint", CM Hribal intends to "forward it on to the Judicial Conduct Commissioner."...(ah, yeah, right-Ed)...and further indicates that once back with MBAAIHST Bruce, we all again run into the ludicrous and clearly untenable situation of the Biased/Corrupt/Whatevs public official deciding on their own Bias/Corruption/Whatevsness...("Whatevsness"?-Ed)...shhh, as was the case with my official complaints about Magistrate White's extraordinary conduct of and during my "bizarre trial", wholly unacceptable conduct that far exceeds mere Bias in it's deliberate intent...

And now, below, here's an absolute top-effort from my other mate, Liberal Treasurer Rob Lucas, whom I emailed my CM Hribal letter, but from whom I've received no response what-so-ever...(onya' Rob mate, cuttin'-crook at Labor about an ICAC you voted for, but you know what's happening with the Political Persecution of Nick Fletcher, and not even a response, well done champ-Ed)...how does he know?...(because he and Liberal Party lawyers looked at this stuff back in May/June 2014, remember?-Ed)...remind me?...(when SAPol (police) Anti-Corruption Branch visited then raided your home on 7th/8th May 2014 and you went to then Liberal, currently re-elected as Independent Member for Mt Gambier, Troy Bell, and he responded weeks later saying he'd run the ICAC Act Section 56 stuff past several senior Liberals, naming 'Rob', and then onto party lawyers, etc, but that 'no-one wanted to give specific advice because 1) the legislation is so vague and 2) is also un-tested in Court'-Ed)...ah yes, I do recall...

Availees may remember that this led to one of my fav moments from Court, February 2016, and I was relating this contact with Troy Bell and the response, etc, to Her Honour Magistrate Anderson in what was Her Honour's first hearing of my then already 1-year old 'Trial', etc, etc, anyhoos, it was mid-bleat I realised I had not one iota of documented proof because 1) I'd dealt personally with Troy at his office, and 2) only really start 'writing stuff' to people when things don't happen and/or I don't trust the person, etc...and it just occurred to me in the moment, "and I take Mr Bell at his word"...(genius!-Ed)...even if we do say so myself, it was pretty cool...(maaate, it's damn near perfect, an honest statement that underpins it's own veracity, and shows you as a trusting person, whilst throwing the onus of trust/believability onto another person, the local Member no less...it's near-genius born of action and honesty-Ed)...cheers mate, and cheers and a big hairy air-hug to the dear availee whom provided me this particular gem...(and squeeeeeeeeeeze, annnnd release-Ed)...ahh, good hug, good hug...and now this...


...(ahhhaaahhahhahhhahahahaaa, ahhh, nice one man-Ed)...no no, that's not me, that's Robbo mate...(maaate-Ed)...as taken from SA Parliament's Hansard, the official Parliamentary Record...(oh, so that's what Robbo, maaate, actually said in Parliament?-Ed)...yep...(wow-Ed)...and again it's fairly self-explanatory, and again, I just can't be bothered...regular availees will do doubt recall my multiple 'experiences' of Liberal MP Rob Lucas, not least of all his senior role in the ultimately pointless Statutory Authority Review Committee Inquiry no. 54 into the Teachers Registration Board where-in I and other parents gave testimonial evidence directly to Rob, mate, in the Old Parliament House on North Tce, aways back in 2008, testimony backed by reams of documents/letters/whatevs...(wasn't that entire 3-year long 'SARC Inquiry' motivated and/or justified by the TRB exoneration of St Martins Lutheran School teacher Glyn Dorling?-Ed)...yep, that's the whole St Martins Child Abuse Cover-up stuff, including the extraordinary conduct of the TRB, where-in they exonerated "text-book grooming paedophile" teacher Glyn Dorling on the strength of his statements that 'the kids were out of control and forcing themselves on me'...(wow-Ed)...well if by 'wow' you mean 'sickeningly corrupt', sure, wow...

To my understanding, this SARC Inquiry no.54 achieved effectively nothing other than stall proper consideration of the St Martins Cover-up, and clearly did nothing to resolve it and/or address the multiple problems with the deeply corrupted structures of the TRB...also please note the references in Robbo's statement to 1) ICAC having the power to force journos to reveal their 'sources', and 2) ICAC having the power to tap people's phones, and 3) ICAC being used to "scare the bejesus out of public servants", an issue I have identified as to how my prosecution is a 'Warning To All Potential Whistleblowers'...these are all gross and deliberate distortions of 'Democracy', yet further proof of the rancidly Fascist intent and nature of both the SA ICAC and the Parliament that spawned it...(like your extraordinary Political Persecution isn't enough-Ed)...well it's all the same animal isn't it...(woof, I mean wow-Ed)...so when Robbo's cuttin'-crook about bloody Labor and the bloody ICAC, just remember that he and the Liberals voted for the bloody thing in the first place... 

Tomorrow: More Documents

Including the stuff my Legal Eagles of that time wrote to ICAC, about the vast vagaries and undefined nature of many aspects of the ICAC Act 2012, particularly Section 56, and the extraordinary response those 2 letters generated, namely, where MBAAIHSTICACC Bruce and the (then) Attorney General, Labor's li'l Johnny Rau changed the ICAC Act 2012 via the ICAC Miscellaneous Amendment Act November 2014, in a manner specifically designed to 'get me'...these documents prove that what I was subsequently 'Convicted' of on 28th February 2018, was not a crime when I was 'raided and reported' by SAPol ACB back in May 2014, or for the related 'Charge Period' (December 2013 - April 2014) although I was never actually 'Charged' and/or Summonsed to Trial either (February 2015)...(just amazing-Ed)...and that Bruce Lander and John Rau changed the ICAC Act...(that really is quite extraordinary-Ed)...any more extraordinary than me being the subject of my very own ICAC/SAPol 'Operation Baritone' since "mid-February 2014"?...(not really, no, it's all quite surreal I'm sure-Ed)...


Not Sure Whom Should Be More Offended:...but recently it was put to me that a regular availee, having watched for the first time in a long time the Shaun Micallef show Mad As Hell, 'The Put-ter' would have believed me if I'd told them that I'd penned half of the atrocious puns and pretentious word-smithery...(heh! I quite like that show!-Ed)...cool ya' jets gran'pa, so do I, it was one of those terrific 'praising mockery' type of jokes indicating that 'The Put-ter' is not one given to praise, but in this context is doing exactly that, and with a degree of humour that is to be appreciated...(nah, fair call, I can dig that-Ed)...they like my blog and what passes for my 'humour and style'...(sure, some don't, a few do-Ed)...exactly, indeed, I considered it such high praise that I acknowledged that by uttering the time-honoured traditional responding salutation, "You Bastard!"...(sob, that's beautiful man, sob, just beautiful-Ed)...

I am Nick 'Miscellaneous Amendment' Fletcher and this is my blog, cheers and laters...

Tuesday, May 8, 2018

More Court Stuff - Letter To Chief Magistrate 19th April 2018

Howdy y'all and welcome to a rather long post, or rather, a series of posts that are my letter of 19th April 2018 to South Australia's Chief Magistrate, plus the various documents and articles attached to that...this post is quite long because it's a 7-page letter, and I'll add the documents after that...cheers, Nick...***

Chief Magistrate Her Honour Mary-Louise Hribal
c/- Adelaide Magistrates Court
Re: MCMTG-15-72 SAPol v Fletcher

I refer to my previous recent letters to you (November/December 2017) regarding the conduct of Magistrate Ian White, and his openly definable Bias against me in my “bizarre trial”* for the supposed crime of 'blogging' about an alleged Independent Commission Against Corruption investigation. (*as reported in The Border Watch newspaper, copy attached)

As you are already aware, Magistrate White's extraordinary behaviours have advanced well beyond mere 'Bias' and into outright Corruption, including definable collusion with SAPol Prosecutions, eg, repeatedly allowing SAPol to table multiple previously unseen documents, and/or change presented 'Charges', that were even then still incorrectly presented. As you know, he has repeatedly allowed SAPol Prosecutions and/or their SAPol witnesses to lie in Court without any repercussions, even when I have caught them and specifically identified these lies in real time right in front of him.

As previously stated, Magistrate White has repeatedly abused me from the Bench, including threatening 'Contempt of Court' every time I try to hold him to account for his lies and collusions, for him leading SAPol's witnesses, or him refusing to read and/or comply with his own 'Orders', etc. He has threatened me so many times I have lost count, but it is evidenced in media reportage as attached.

These reports show that he was threatening me in February 2017 and is still threatening me in March 2018, and his latest extended 'Contempt of Court' threat (Friday 9th March 2018) included a bizarre attempt to get me to confess to some unseen and unidentified statements that 'someone' had apparently 'shown him from the blog', and stating 'I assume it was you who put it on there'. Without identifying specifically what was said or where I had supposedly 'blogged it' or who had 'shown it to him', etc, he straight-out asked me “...did you put that on there?”. It was a ridiculous exchange and I refused to answer.

He concluded this latest 'Contempt of Court' threat by saying that he will 'consider this' and make a decision about it at a later date. Having made that open-ended threat, again, he has failed to provide me any evidence/copies of these supposed 'Contempts', therefore deliberately denying me any opportunity to address them. This is yet another deliberate corruption of process, backed as it is with yet further threats.

As you know from my previous letters, when I was ill during the November 2017 hearing dates, he subpoened my doctor and forced her to discuss my personal Medical Records, in open Court, as was then reported across the district in the local media. He then dismissed my Medical Certificate, made statements about how 'unusual it is to continue in such circumstances', before then proceeding and concluding my “bizarre trial” in my absence.

Furthermore, on Monday 27th November 2017 Magistrate White made the extraordinary statement that he intended to 'conclude this trial this week', but then late the next day, Tuesday 28th November 2017, he conceded that the 'Trial' had a long way to go and was 'likely to continue beyond the week'. Despite this he continued and concluded in my absence.

As you are aware, there have been over 30 adjournments in my 3 year-long 'Trial' and that every single one is due to SAPol Prosecution's incompetence, especially the multiple errors evident in SAPol's erroneous 'Charge Sheet', errors which forced Magistrate Anderson to call yet another adjournment on Day One of my November 2016 'Trial'. Those errors remain and I have repeatedly identified them to Magistrate White, but he has ignored me and/or dismissed them as irrelevant.

Magistrate White identifies these 30+ SAPol adjournments in his Reasons for Ruling from November 30th 2017, including noting his own absence for Medical Reasons in May-July 2017, and the open-ended absence of SAPol's Lead Investigator/witness (*name removed due to Suppression Orders*), also allegedly for Medical Reasons. He acknowledges that it's an exceptionally unusual circumstance to continue, but then compares my case to that of a man on bail for a violent assault, and continues in my absence anyway.

Furthermore, this concession about previous adjournments has not stopped him from openly, repeatedly abusing me for 'wasting the Court's valuable time', especially during the November 2017 trial dates when he repeatedly railed against me, including an extraordinary tirade of abuse about wasting the time of the ICAC/SAPol witness, stating;
“...they're Major Crime in the middle of investigating two murders...”

Magistrate White was half-out of his chair, semi-ranting at me whilst pointing at the ICAC/SAPol witness, whom was herself literally slack-jawed, staring wide-eyed at me in shock and disbelief. It is an outrageous and egregious abuse of a defendant by a Magistrate clearly acting in a biased and unbalanced fashion.

By proceeding and concluding in my absence, Magistrate White has deliberately denied me;
  1. concluding my cross examination of the already proven liar SAPol's (*name removed);
  2. any chance to cross examine the already proven liar (*name removed) (ABC SE Radio);
  3. presenting my answers to SAPol Prosecution's questioning;
  4. presenting any defense witnesses;
  5. presenting any defense what-so-ever;
  6. presenting any closing argument;
  7. a 'Fair Trial'.

I have been denied presenting my main defense witness, who provided the Court with a written Affidavit/submission back in early 2016, and has been ready to go to 'Trial' first in August 2016, then November 2016, then March 2017, and then again in November 2017, but has been denied the opportunity.

As you are aware, I have proven in my “bizarre trial” that ICAC Comm Bruce Lander is the original complainant against me (January/February 2014), and that he has acted unilaterally in personally referring me directly to SAPol's Anti-Corruption Branch. However, in response to my letters/complaints about Magistrate White's outrageous conduct you sent me back to Bruce Lander in one of his many other roles, as the Judicial Conduct Commissioner. This response is disingenuous, facetious and almost mocking. Why send me back to the corrupt public official personally responsible for instigating this “bizarre trial”, this Political Persecution, this travesty of justice, this “Malicious Prosecution”?

Since my last letter to you, Magistrate White's wildly inconsistent behaviours have deteriorated even further. Any sense of Legal Propriety, appropriate Judicial Conduct, and Defendant's Rights to a Fair Trial, etc, have been completely abandoned as he has pursued his clearly defined desire to 'Convict' me regardless of and despite what has occurred in Court.

Having denied me a 'Fair Trial', on February 28th 2018 Magistrate White then delivered his provably lie-riddled* 'Judgement' in the most grossly unprofessional circumstances. (*eg, he refers to SAPol ACB's (*name removed) as a “reliable witness”, a clearly provable lie about a proven liar). Having 'Ordered' that I attend Mt Gambier Courthouse at 0930hrs, Magistrate White finally appeared via Videolink from Elizabeth Courthouse at 1000hrs.

After one of South Australia's most important and precedent 'Trials' of recent times, a 'Trial' setting the precedent for further prosecution of the most extraordinarily vague but omnipotently powerful ICAC Act 2012, Section 56, Magistrate White did not even come to Mt Gambier to deliver his 'Verdict', and then showed-up 30 minutes late, said 'you're guilty', without any explanation and without reading the 'Verdict' onto the record.

There has been more than 3 years of trials/hearings, involving more than 30 'adjournment hearings' and 11 days of actual 'Trial', spread across 3 different 'Trials' after the bizarre collapse of my original 3 day 'Trial' in November 2016, where-in I clearly proved “Malicious Prosecution” to Magistrate Anderson causing Her Honour to recuse herself at the start of proceedings on Day Two, etc. Then, after his own “bizarre trial” proceedings, Magistrate White delivers his grossly distorted 'Verdict' via video-link from Elizabeth, and does not even read that 'Judgement' onto the record.

As you are aware, “Malicious Prosecution” is the term that Her Honour used in Court on 11th October 2016, when making the 'Order' that I prove at trial my repeated allegations that this proceedings was a Political Persecution. I cannot specifically prove this because Magistrate White has repeatedly refused my requests for those transcripts and/or recordings, but you have access to the transcripts/recordings, and the two 'special hearings' of 8th February and 8th March 2017 are self-evidently about “Malicious Prosecution”.

I have received no explanation what-so-ever as to why my 'Trial' then just continued anyway on 24th November 2016 with Magistrate White, the third Magistrate in my 'Trial', who then moved my ”Malicious Prosecution” to it's own 'hearing' 8th February 2017, wherein he refused me presenting or even verbally addressing any of the 100 documents I had spent weeks carefully collating. On 8th March he then dismissed the “Malicious Prosecution”, carefully picking tiny fragments of my documentation to try and set me up for 'Defamation', and then making the outrageous statement that 'there is no proof of the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up'.

And here-in lies the fundamental motivation for this rankly corrupt “Malicious Prosecution” by SAPol, at the direct behest of Bruce Lander, and as being conducted by Magistrate White. I am being punished/persecuted for 'blogging' about the realities of the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up, as well as 'blogging' about multiple other gross criminal corruptions in my local Mt Gambier City Council, SAPol, State Parliament, etc.

This “bizarre trial” is motivated by a desire to shut-down my blog, The Mount Gambier Independent, in a context where I cannot be sued for 'Defamation' because what I 'blog' is factually correct. Furthermore, this “Malicious Prosecution” is an attempt by the State government to gain absolute control over 'Social Media'. It is also a direct and deliberate threat to anyone like Public Servants, 'bloggers', etc who might consider speaking-out about corruption, etc.

On 28th February 2018, SAPol Prosecution's Batten was not in either Court, but was somewhere un-identified to me, calling-in via phone. On the right half of my screen was a man sitting with his arms crossed, and on the left was a long-shot of Magistrate White and his Courtroom, and he started to speak but I interrupted and identified this man, whom I stated appeared to be on Videolink from the Mt Gambier Gaol.

Magistrate White could clearly also see this person because he then referred to this man, 'the gentleman with his arms crossed, please remain silent', and there was more time wasted whilst the Videolink was sorted-out. I do not know why Magistrate White continued if he could see this other person, but that man was for Magistrate Anderson's list, because we were now well into Her Honour's time, which Magistrate White repeatedly referenced in delivering his 'Verdict'.

Magistrate White repeatedly used this excuse, 'we are cutting into Magistrate Anderson's Court List time', to deliver his 'Verdict' without any explanation, whilst refusing to answer my specific questions about how I had been prosecuted under the ICAC Miscellaneous Amendment Act November 27th 2014, legislation changed after I was allegedly 'reported' and raided on 8th May 2014.

I raised this ICAC MMA 2014 with Magistrate White in my Final Submission of 21st February 2018, copy attached, and then again with the journalists waiting in Court with me for that 30mins on 28th February 2018, and then again directly to him when he finally showed-up. He refused to discuss it, saying 'my reasons are in the verdict', whilst repeatedly referring to how we were interfering with Her Honour's List, then he 'adjourned for sentencing', and hung-up on me, again.

After finding me guilty on all 18 counts, Magistrate White then identified that it was a potential maximum fine of $30,000 per count, which I immediately pointed out to him totalled $540,000. He did not question or dispute this, and when he hung up on me, that was the figure still being discussed, as reported in The Border Watch (attached).

In his 'Verdict' Magistrate White avoids this issue of the legislation being changed, then deliberately lies about the definition of 'To Publish'. The documented chronology of events proves that my lawyer wrote to ICAC Comm Bruce Lander on 2nd July 2014, asking that specific question about defining 'To Publish', and after Lander's dismissive response (14th July), wrote again on 18th July 2018. It is fact that Lander and Attorney General John Rau then changed the ICAC Act via the ICAC MAA 2014 27th November 2014, where-in a 'To Publish' definition is specifically identified and included. All of this is on the Hansard and on ICAC's own website.

I have proven beyond any doubt, reasonable or otherwise, that when Bruce Lander unilaterally sent SAPol Anti-Corruption Branch after me (January-February 2014), and they repeatedly tried to interview me without representation present, then raided my home and 'seized as evidence' my laptop (7th-8th May 2014), the supposed 'Crime' that I have been 'Convicted' of, was not a crime. I have proven this.

In Court and in writing, I have proved to Magistrate White that;
  1. Bruce Lander and John Rau changed the ICAC Act 2012, in a manner specifically designed to allow prosecuting me, adding a specific definition of 'To Publish';
  2. therefore when I was 'reported' and raided the supposed 'Crime' of which I have been subsequently 'Convicted', was not a 'Crime'.
Magistrate White flatly refused to address this issue, even when I raised it with him during the “bizarre” Verdict Hearing, and it was not until he was exposed in the local media the next day, 1st March 2018, copy attached, that he suddenly emailed me his “bizarre” Addendum Friday 2nd March 2018, and then an even more “bizarre” version of that, Addendum 2, on Monday 5th March, and then a full 'Updated Judgement + Addendum 2' emailed to me 6th March.

In his “bizarre” Addenda, Magistrate White attempts to address my statements/questions about the ICAC MMA 2014, but first blames me for not properly explaining this to him. Not only is blaming me extraordinary conduct from Magistrate White, it is a provable lie, and you have that proof already, in my Submission 21st February 2018. It is further a proven lie because when I raised it with him in Court 28th February 2018, he refused to answer me, as reported in The Border Watch.

In Addendum 2, he openly acknowledges that the ICAC Act was changed and that I am correct that I was prosecuted under the wrong definition of 'To Publish', but then produces his own deliberately anonymous version of 'Publish', which appears to be his version of the definition associated with 'Defamation Law'. He clearly does not want to identify where this 'version' originates, and even goes further by providing a dictionary definition. None of this is legally appropriate and is covered at length in my lawyer's letters from 2014, as attached.

Magistrate White has acted with a perpetual and definable Bias against me, a Bias that has involved deliberate misrepresentation of witnesses' conduct and/or evidence, repeatedly just ignoring me and/or threatening me, and gross distortion of 'Appropriate Court Process', all to a degree that define his conduct as not just Bias but as outright Corruption.

His deliberately incompetent conduct is self-evident in his refusals/failures to resolve the five most fundamental issues;
  1. to address the repeatedly officially acknowledged Constitutional Law issues involved, up to and including refusing my multiple entreaties to pick-up his own Certificate of Record and read/acknowledge where Magistrate Anderson 'Ordered' SAPol Prosecutions to sort it all out (Feb 16) so that all State's Attorneys-General could be notified;
  2. to define the undefinable ICAC Act 2012 Section 56, meaning I have been prosecuted under non-defined legislation;
  3. to explain why I was not 'Charged' or 'Summonsed' by SAPol;
  4. to address the gross multiple faults that Magistrate Anderson identified with SAPol's 'Charge Sheet', and now;
  5. the ICAC Act MAA 2014 changes, and the 'Non-Crime' I have been 'Convicted' of.
He/SAPol have also failed to even prove the basic facts of who put what on the blog. I note that SAPol still have my laptop and therefore direct access to the blog's 'control panel' , and can make changes to any aspect of the blog through my account, without my knowledge. I note that several recent posts have completely disappeared from the blog, but I have received no relevant notifications from Google, and when I have re-posted my saved copies, those re-posts remain.

When I have 'blogged' about these disappearances and my belief that it is SAPol using my laptop, I have suddenly received threatening letters from lawyer Bill DeGaris, supposedly taking responsibility for these 'removals', but refusing to meet me or provide evidence that they are responsible.

On March 9th 2018 I again attended Mt Gambier Courthouse at 0915hrs, for 0930hrs, and Magistrate White again appeared via video-link from Elizabeth, this time at 0945hrs, 15 minutes late, and with SAPol Pros Batten standing right in front of him.

After reaffirming the $540,000 potential maximum fine, Magistrate White did not reduce the fines to a more manageable or reasonable level, instead citing my personal financial situation as reason to commute that fine to the maximum allowable 300hrs of Community Service. I understand that this means the precedent $30,000 per 'Count' maximum remains as being legally ratified.

Then Magistrate White and SAPol's Batten engaged in a 'chat' about potential Suppression and/or Intervention and/or Restraining Orders. They had clearly been discussing these potential Orders in the 15 minutes the Mt Gambier Court had been waiting for them, with Magistrate White repeatedly finishing Batten's sentences and leading her into the next. He specifically raised the issue of “suppressing the blog in it's entirety”.

I did not pick up much of what they were saying, because they were discussing among themselves and not talking to me, but I clearly heard a 'Form 12' mentioned and then a 'Form 19'. When Magistrate White asked SAPol's Batten what she had written down and/or prepared, Batten replied 'is it ok if it's on a blank page?' I did not catch the response, but assumed this was not appropriate because Magistrate White then adjourned again, giving Batten until Friday 16th March to provide me details of these 'interventions', before setting a new 'Hearing' date for Friday 20th April.

After more than 30 SAPol adjournments prior to the November 2017 'Trial' dates, and then over-riding my Medical Certificate and concluding proceedings in my absence, Magistrate White then gives SAPol yet a further adjournment because yet again they have not done their paperwork.

I was assuming that Magistrate White 'Ordered' me to collect those details from Mt Gambier Court House because, as has happened in the past, I was expecting reams of irrelevant documentation, case law, etc. Instead, SAPol Prosecutions have provided a one-page, single-sided statement (attached), bereft of any official seals, identifiers, names or letterheads. Given the 'discussion' (9th March) Magistrate White clearly knew that he was 'Ordering' me to pick up a single page document, something which could easily have been e-mailed to me. I consider this an an act of deliberate annoyance.

Furthermore, this one-page document provides no reasoning as to why any of these people need to be 'protected' from me, be it physically or otherwise. It also does not specifically identify Magistrate White's statements about 'banning me from Council meetings', instead trying to hide this directive in the '(*name removed) Application', wherein it mentions Orders relating to his “role as a Councillor”.

This document also does not identify Magistrate White's statement about “suppressing the blog in it's entirety”, which was being discussed as an application by SAPol. Why is that SAPol application not even mentioned? This has been done deliberately to deny me appropriate opportunity to address these extraordinary issues.

Beyond that, the 'applications' are self-evidently nonsensical, specifically directing me to police the 'Intervention Orders':
“The defendant must not... allow... another person to do anything forbidden by this order.”

This clearly directs me to stop literally anyone from 'going near and/or phoning, writing to, emailing, direct messaging', etc, (*name removed) or (*name removed). The '(*name removed) Application' is similarly ridiculous, 'Ordering' that I monitor “the internet” and “any other means” to ensure that “another person” does not “publish material”.

Magistrate White has clearly been in communication with and/or receiving directions/orders from other persons outside of and even during my “bizarre trial”, is irrefutably acting in collusion with SAPol Prosecutions, and is definably operating as part of the “Malicious Prosecution” that I proved in Court in November 2016. His conduct is definably corrupt.

At this time, I am deeply concerned as to how Magistrate White's increasingly erratic and openly hostile behaviour will manifest itself next; as previously identified, he has indicated he is going to try and suppress social media, issue multiple 'Intervention/Restraining Orders', and has perpetually threatened me with 'Contempt of Court'.

Please note that 6 months ago I lodged official complaints about several members of the Mt Gambier City Council and their constantly abusive and harassing conduct toward me personally and on Social Media, and this included the multiple 'incidents' instigated by (*name removed). Both Minister Brock and the Local Government Association 'referred' my complaints back to MGCC CEO Mark McShane, despite the fact that he is directly identified for his harassment and threats, and I am still waiting for any response from him.

I have attempted to lodge an Appeal, but have been informed that despite the two 'Verdict hearings', there is still nothing officially ratified on my Court record, and because my 'Trial' is therefore still technically ongoing, I cannot Appeal.

Given Magistrate White's refusals to provide me critical recordings/transcripts, and they are obviously critical for my impending Appeal, I officially request that you immediately provide me all of those recordings from every 'hearing', commencing February 2015.

I further note that on 3rd June 2015 Liberal Rob Lucas stated in Parliament his concerns that the Weatherill Labor government was using ICAC to attack Public Servants (copy attached). This is exactly what is being done to me, I am being persecuted for speaking-out about Institutionalised Corruption, in what is the text-book definition of Fascism, ie, a Government using the Courts to attack citizens.

Given that Magistrate White is clearly not a fit and proper person to be in conduct of my 'Trial', I re-iterate my request that you intervene immediately, pending a full judicial inquiry that is entirely independent of Comm. Lander, the original complainant against me.

Yours,   Nick Fletcher

***...so there you go...I'll sort-out those documents and post them this arvo', along with the one-paragraph response yet again sending me back to Bruce Lander...ludicrous...apart from that, please excuse me, but I'm coming to terms with just how exhausted I am after so many years of the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up and this subsequent, directly related Political Persecution...after the bumbling shenanigans of lodging my 'Appeal Process' last week, I've all-but stopped for a week, I simply have no energy left for this shizzle...still gunna' blog, etc, but it's just stupid of me to try and stoically fight this fatigue, it's an unwinnable battle...

I am Nick Fletcher and this is my blog, cheers and laters...

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

An Appealing Prospect - Yes, It's More Court Stuff

Howdy y'all in Ukraine, Poland, Germany, and France, and to y'all else too, welcome to TMGI...regular availees will be well aware of the shonky shenanigans of my "bizarre trial" (The Border Watch, Nov 2017) and it's equally bizarre conclusion, as held across 3 separate 'hearings' February 28th, March 9th, and then finally April 20th 2018...now, welcome to the extraordinary shenanigans of trying to Appeal that farcical 'judgement'...and just on that point, I know some people are challenged by the language I use to describe Magistrate White and his extraordinary conduct, because some are restrained by Social Imperatives of respect for the Judiciary/Authority, etc, and I fully concur that that is how things should be...however...

Respect Must Be Earned Not Demanded:...and for all of my whingin' and bitchin' here on this 'ere blog, there ain't nuthin' y'all will read here that wasn't first aired in Open Court and to Magistrate White's face, eg, his definable bias against me was raised with him in Court back in February 2017, and as reported in the local media...my official complaints about his conduct have repeatedly and  bizarrely been referred back to him to decide on...(and amazingly he decided he wasn't biased against you-Ed)...well indeed, and weren't we all shocked by that...feedback indicates that some find my 'disrespect' to be 'distasteful', but all I can ask is that y'all try to read-past my anger and sarcasm, etc, and involve y'allselves purely in the Court Processes and Magistrate's conduct, etc, and see in those things the gross and deeply disturbing distortions of Appropriate Process...

Forget who or even what this is about, on a purely procedural level, on a purely judicial level, the conduct of my "bizarre trial" is a cause for concern for all South Australians...how is the official conduct of my 'Trial' in any way appropriate?...would y'all like to get treated like this by SAPol?...(and more concerningly, by the Courts?-Ed)...well indeed, and if the Courts are capable of this, then what does that say about literally everything else that goes through SA Courts?...currently, my complaints to Chief Magistrate Hribal (which will be the next coupla' posts, promise) keep getting referred on to Judicial Conduct Commissioner Bruce Lander...(but didn't you write explaining that Bruce, mate, is the original complainant against you and the instigator of this "Malicious Prosecution*"?-Ed)...yep, sent me back to him again anyway...but we digress...
 (*Magistrate Anderson, October 2016)

As I write this, Tuesday 1st May 2018, I have managed to technically engage with the 'Appeal Process', and cannot think of a better way to explain that stuttering start than including the letter I yesterday emailed the Courts Administration Authority and Legal Services Commission in Adelaide and provided to Mt Gambier office of Correctional Services...here t'is...

Dear Madam/Sir,
Thankyou for your email of Friday 27th April 2018, in response to my Application to Appeal my conviction in the Magistrates Court (MCMTG-15-72) to the Supreme Court, emailed on Thursday 26th April 2018.

Because I have been refused Legal Aid I have been forced to self-represent, and thoroughly researched this Application with both the Courts Administration Authority and the Legal Services Commission by phone. On Tuesday 24th April 2018 I spoke with the CAA and LSC and was told that I needed to provide a Form 38 with a Form 2 (Front Page), but could not access that document with my computer.

On Thursday I went to the Mt Gambier library to download Forms 2 and 38, filled them out as best I could, and tried to lodge them at the Mt Gambier Courthouse, but was told that they/we do not have a 'Supreme Court Registrar' and that I would have to email or post them.

I went home and again rang CAA and was told that it was appropriate to email the forms and that there were no fees attached to that. Minutes later I received a return phonecall saying that actually there was a $232.00 Filing Fee, but that it was appropriate to email my forms and then post a cheque/money order.

It was critical that this lodgement was done correctly because I also took copies of the forms to Correctional Services to have my impending 260hrs of Community Service suspended, and as far as I was aware this had all been done correctly.

As you are aware I received several emails on Friday, yours included, stating that,
  1. the Forms 2 and 38 were the wrong forms, and;
  2. that they could not be submitted by email, but must be posted.
Could you please clarify this for me as best you can and are allowed?
  1. Do I still need two forms, Form 2 and 52, or just Form 52?
  2. Is there a waiver provision for Pensioners for these 'Application Fees'?
I find it extraordinary the immediate financial burden placed on ordinary citizens to just lodge an 'Application', as this clearly immediately denies many people even getting that far with an Appeal Process.

In my matter, the Constitutional Law implications were clearly identified and defined throughout my 3 year 'Trial', including that they should have been resolved by a COAG (Attorneys-General) meeting before the 'Trial' even commenced, but Magistrate White chose to just ignore all this and proceeded to 'Convict' me in my absence.

Why do I have to pay to lodge an 'Appeal' to address the gross and deliberate failings of Magistrate White? In this context, it is absolutely appropriate to suspend all 'Fees', and I formally request that.

Yours, Nick Fletcher

**note to self, those emails were received Thursday 26th, mid-arvo, not Friday 27th, oops**

...so there you go, deadset, I repeatedly rang to ensure I was using the correct forms and then that they were lodged correctly,  etc, and yet somehow I've managed to take my own Appeal Process several steps backward, albeit whilst following the path laid-out for me by CAA and LSC...both quickly responded to rectify these 'errors', and have already forwarded me the correct Form 2 and Form 52, and a lengthy Application to Waive Fees form, cheers to y'all for that...

Please note, whilst I do find it unusual that my attempted Application was responded to so quickly, given that I was told it could take weeks and that nothing would happen at least until 'they' received that $232.00 Filing Fee cheque, I don't consider this to be in the same 'Definable Collusion' ballpark as the reprehensible conduct of Magistrate White, SAPol, and these 3 rankly corrupt 'Suppression Order' individuals...it's a bit like back in February/March 2015 when I was having all sorts of shenanigans with SAPol initially not Summonsing me to Court, then repeatedly coming to my home to re-Summons me, etc, and I was also pulled-over right in front of my home...as I posted at the time, that was simply a perfectly average traffic stop entirely separate to the Court nonsense whirling around it all...

So it is a bit odd that my Appeal Process was processed so rapidly, but not necessarily any sign of collusion..(well I'd have thought with the enormous implications and extraordinary length of your "bizarre trial", that the CAA and others would have been given some sort of heads-up about the likelihood of an Appeal-Ed)...well sure, possibly, could be that my File Number sets little bells-a-ringin' and li'l flags-a-flyin', but whatevs, to my experience of what's happening, this is just fairly basic bureaucratic 'bungling', for lack of a better word, and not an indicator of a specific plan to stuff me around deliberately...and it is important to differentiate between the 2 things, because there's a world of difference between Mistake and Malice, and I have proven in Court that my "bizarre trial" is a "Malicious Prosecution" that originated with ICAC Commissioner Bruce Lander...  

Regular availees will also recall I'm sure, that Magistrate White slapped 3 deeply corrupt 'Suppression/Intervention/Restraining Orders' on me, albeit without any explanation/justification, and despite my protestations about my current (pending) complaints to the Local Government Minister about the abusive and harassing behaviours of at least one of these people toward me...all 3 'Orders' are a complicit collusion between Magistrate White, SAPol (police) Prosecutions, and the deeply corrupt individuals involved...these 'Orders' are Magistrate White colluding with SAPol to hide the rank corruption of these 3 people...

It is my understanding that my Appeal Process renders those 'Orders' as irrelevant, but y'all will excuse me I'm sure if I err on the side of caution until I have that irrefutably confirmed...(well it's not like it exactly stops you blogging shizzle about the rankly corrupt Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Mt Gambier City Council and SAPol-Ed)...well indeed, there's an unfortunately fathomless well from which to draw stories about the rank and often Pro-Paedophile corruption of SAPol, the ABC, and MGCC...anyhoos, as stated, until otherwise confirmed, I'm gunna' stay right away from those 'Orders'... 

Tomorrow: My Official 'Complaints' About Magistrate White

Dear Availees:...please never lose sight of the realities of what has been done to me in the Magistrates Court and the starkly Fascist motivations and outcome...the South Australian government and Courts have given themselves the power to control exactly what you say and where and how you say it, and if they don't like it, you'll get attacked using the rankly Fascist ICAC Act 2012/14 Section 56, and fined $540,000 for telling the truth about a Public Office (the ICAC) supposedly doing exactly what it's supposedly meant to do and exonerating all involved...

Just to re-iterate, I've been found 'Guilty' of writing the truth about something that actually happened, a Public Office investigating Public (elected) Officials mis-use of Public Monies, but apparently the Public musn't know about it...furthermore, I proved in Court that that deeply secretive 'investigation' involved 2 'unrecorded chats', namely, 1) with MGCC CEO Mark McShane in a corridor in the Adelaide Convention Centre, and 2) with me in Metro Cafe in clear earshot of at least 6 random people...so I've been persecuted via the Magistrates Court for more than 3 years, for writing about a farcical non-investigation that is supposedly so sacrosanct that no-one is allowed to even discuss it, even though it was held in a cafe...farcically corrupt and openly Fascist persecution...welcome to the SA Courts...

I am Nick Fletcher and this is my blog...cheers and laters...