(Dude! "tinkered around the edges"? really? have you read your last post?-Ed)...dude, I wrote it...(oh yeah-Ed)...yeah, and I'm telling you that it really, really only strayed briefly onto the periphery of the Field of Blossoming Furies that this particular hypocrisy plowed into me...(but dude, you called him a 'pro-paedophile corrupt politician who has made his career off the back of supporting the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up'...I do not call that 'tinkering around the edges'-Ed)...yeah, but I didn't call him that in a context where I just don't like him and it's just me slinging slanderous sludge 'cos I'm pissed-off, Mr Perrymans' own actions define him for exactly what he is, and what he has done is what he has done, and it makes him exactly who he is...I didn't write the book that is Steve, I'm just quoting the text...
Careful What You Wish For:...because I've recently been lamenting the loss of anger and it's empowering motivation, replaced by energy-sapping sadness, but good ol' Steve has helped me back to my happy-angry place with this extraordinary piece of work...it's still going to be a long climb back to 'enjoying' doing this 'ere blog, and doing a daily post, etc, but here I am and here we go...
And in my own defense, I'm extremely annoyed with myself for letting this particular hypocrisy make me so angry and affect me so fundamentally...(angry you say, I hadn't noticed-Ed)...careful what you sarcastically wish for Ed, 'cos there's some real rage comin' to this 'ere page and couched in such confronting terms that it becomes it's own unproven threat...(what? what the shreck are you on about?-Ed)...all will be made clear assgroper...(that's 'grasshopper' to you thanks champ-Ed)...sorry?...(it's 'grasshopper'-Ed)...that's what I said...(no, you said "assgroper"-Ed)...and now so have you...and now you availee have also said "assgroper" twice...make that thrice...(are you quite done?-Ed)...sorry, just trying to humour-it-up a bit from a place of anger and sadness and so it's going to be a bit forced...(and then we're probably gunna' end-up in the 'Dead Laugh Area', again-Ed)...exactly!...and then we'll just have to jarringly and disjointedly wrench the whole thing back to this...
Now I know y'all have just read that, but I'm going to write it out again because it's just so very unbelievable,
"If dogs are put to sleep for attacking children, why aren't we doing the same to pedophiles?"
Now I ain't proffering no opinion on the sentiment in-and-of-itself, but this is very clearly calling for the execution of paedophiles, this is about Capital Punishment for paedophiles, this is about killing paedophiles...(mate, this is very nearly an incitement to vigilantism-Ed)...sorry, not with you...(well, here we have a supposedly respected public figure, the former Mayor and current Councillor, posting something that says 'why aren't we killing paedophiles?', in a context where we here in Oz don't have Capital Punishment-Ed)...oh, I see what you mean, it's laden with layers of direct criticism of our Courts/Laws/whatevs, and implied incitement and inferred direction...(spot on...this strays from commentary, through criticism, and on to directive-Ed)...indeed, and particularly given 1) the highly emotive subject matter, and 2) the finality of the proposition...
Cue Hypocrisy One:...and the latest first...given the current bunfight...(is that a fight with Currant buns?-Ed)...no, no it isn't...given the current stoush within Council re Councillors inappropriate use of 'social media', etc, it's a hypocrisy for Steve mate...(maaate-Ed)...to be posting such graphically inappropriate material...(you mean the inferred/incited vigilantism stuff?-Ed)...exactly...it's one thing to have an opinion about critical issues like Child Protection/paedophilia/whatevs, and to calmly and clearly provide accurate commentary...(like on this 'ere blog, for example-Ed)...well perhaps that's not a perfect example, but yes, I do try to be accurate if I'm not always exactly 'calm'...(and fair enough too, given what you've been through and all-Ed)...and I ain't the former Mayor/current Councillor either...(yes, one does expect something a little less 'unhinged' from ones' duly elected officials-Ed)...one does, and apart from that, there remains the original hypocrisy of doing this on 'social media'...
Then there's the latest The Border Watch newspaper front page afforded Steve mate...(maaate-Ed)...where-in Stevo spruiks the alleged massive benefits of Council paying to move the Millicent Rd Tourist Info Bay thingy for approx $150,000...not a hypocrisy relative to the rank corruption of Stevo's pro-paedophile behaviour and this extraordinary meme, but a beauty all the same...just thought I'd drop it in as a quick spoiler for a future post...more rank Nepotism, Insider Trading, Conflict of Interests, and howling 'Media Hypocrisy'...laters...back to Steve and his meme, and Hypocrisy Two...
So Steve mate...(maaate-Ed)...what should we do with pro-paedophile Mayors? what to do with a pro-paedophile Council? a pro-paedophile State Government/Parliament? should we take these rankly corrupt pro-paedophile stooges down to the Vets for a quick spot of vigilantee justice?...what do you think Stevo?...what should parents do when they learn a teacher has abused their children? should they go to their State Authorities and Elected Public Officials and ask them to sort it? or should they take the lesson that the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up has taught us all, and apply your meme?...(so you're asking the vaguely rhetorical question, 'should parents, knowing that State Authorities are likely to cover-up the abuse and protect the paedophile, should those parents put the paedophile to sleep themselves?'-Ed)...a very neat summation thankyou Ed...
And the extraordinary irony inherent in this statement is that SAPol (police) officers at Mt Gambier SAPol Station twice told parents from St Martins to 'sort it out yourselves, take him ("text-book grooming paedophile" teacher Glyn Dorling) out in the pines and don't bring him back'...SAPol then failed/refused to even interview Dorling, dumping the case only weeks later...
And what's worse Steve mate...(maaate-Ed)...what's worse than an 'actual paedophile who it may potentially be argued suffers from an 'illness' and commits an albeit heinous crime, what's worse than that Steve?...(well I'm not Steve and I can't answer for him, but I'd suggest that a supposedly sane and allegedly moral high-ranking public official conducting themselves in a manner to protect and support and foster paedophilia, that that's worse, and given that Mt Gambier City Mayor/Councillor Steve Perryman has behaved exactly like that, that makes Stevos' behaviours worse-Ed)...I'm with you Ed, and chuck-in Stevos' political pal Rory McEwen and a few dozen others when it comes to behaviours worse than the perpetrators'...
And I ain't just slingin' vitriole for the joy of it, I'm also doing it because it's real...Glyn Dorling abused dozens of junior primary children at St Martins and will have further abused since leaving, and it's all horrendous, but Messrs Perryman, McEwen, Rann, Weatherill, etc, etc, et al, have by their actions (or lack of) condemned all children in South Australia to complete vulnerability at the hands of a wholly corrupt pro-paedophile System...and when the System's wholly corrupt, who fixes the System?...and then we get this clown putting this bullshit on Facebook...and again, the question asks itself, what should we do with rankly corrupt pro-paedophile public officials?...anyone?...Steve?...
(Well they've built a lovely wall right there in the middle of town at the Main Corner there, how's about we stand a few rankly corrupt pro-paedophile politicians up in front of that?-Ed)...see, there you go Ed, embrace your fury, it's good for what ails ya'...(come to the Dark Side Ed, I am your father-A Lucas Films Character Not Specifically Identified To Avoid Copyright Complications)...(ALFCNSITACC? wow, we get some fascinating cameo characters on this 'ere blog-Ed)...don't we though...and you yourself Ed, you're a fascinating study in the manipulative power of words and the individuals' willingness to suspend disbelief and engage with a character...(you called me a character-Ed)...indeed, you're far more to me Ed than just a confected literary device I utilise to create dialogue, set-up jokes, etc, you are a character, in fact, a character with character...(oh stop it already-Ed)...think nothing of it Ed 'cos when I flatter you I flatter myself...(oh yeah, cheers mate, just charming-Ed)...shut it!...
And A Thorough Disclaimer:...that all allusions to violence, be it 'appropriately' legally sanctioned or otherwise, these are merely observations on my part, observations riddled with facetiousness and sarcasm and other poor humours, albeit all fuelled by a very real anger...so y'all think what y'all want re how y'all would feel/behave/react in my position, but my personal position remains as always that Capital Punishment is wrong for the very basest of legal realities, we make mistakes and we convict innocent people...Courts and juries and the whole shebang, it's all just people and people make mistakes...but I digress...
I'll go further and say that Steve mate...(maaate-Ed)...hasn't just failed and/or refused to engage with the St Martins Cover-up, in support of this pro-paedophile nightmare he has run a campaign of denigration and harassment and attempted intimidation of parents, particularly me...I've covered this in many previous posts, eg, with the Councils' 2013/14 Budget meetings where-in Steve mate...(maaate-Ed)...twice physically harassed me and tried to pick fights with me...(extraordinary!-Ed)...well quite, but that's what happened, and he continues to 'confront' me with faux-friendly greetings, eg, outside Council meetings, as also cited in recent posts...(very odd behaviour-Ed)...indeed, I'm not sure exactly what he's after, but he'd want to be careful that he doesn't find it...(I think he wants to find himself on the receiving end of a 'Christian Cuddle'-Ed)...oh Ed, you monkey genius, the good ol' Christian Cuddle...
When one talks 'St Martins Cover-up', inevitably we come to the 'Christian Cuddle'...(ah, the 'Christian Cuddle', as utilised by St Martins/the Lutherans/whoevs to try and assimilate the realities of some of the physical abuses committed against 7 year old children by their "text-book grooming paedophile" teacher Glyn Dorling-Ed)...indeed Ed, the phrasing used quite specifically to try and confront then 'own' then redefine the realities of St Martins...(where-in the school/Lutherans tried to address the physical realities they couldn't refute by firstly identifying/acknowledging these behaviours but then diluting them as being merely "cuddles"-Ed)...with the added dilution of making those cuddles "Christian", itself a further attempt to raise-up the credibility of the paedophile...(whilst also inviting the receiver of this info to be a good and understanding 'Christian' and therefore support the teacher/school/Church-Ed)...yeah, all of that...
This is exactly what the Lutherans did to us at St Martins...we were/are portrayed as unstable trouble-makers who were/are damnedly and incorrectly denigrating a good man and a great school/Church...and this is the phrase they used/still use, a "Christian Cuddle"...bad parents, everything's fine...(just fine-Ed)...it was just a Christian Cuddle...a perfectly harmless act of pious and appropriate affection...between a 50 year old man and 7 year old students...everything's just fine, just a cuddle, how could that be a problem?...Steve, mate, how might a Christian Cuddle be considered other than fine, how might it be considered 'problematic'?...(well, I'd suggest the tone you're using right now and the look on your face are both fair indicators of the potential 'problematicnous' of giving someone a Christian Cuddle-Ed)...indeed Ed, I know we've covered this ground before, but I ain't writing the script, I'm just scrawling angry critique in the margins...
(And it's just so 'you' to make such stark criticism, with your big red angry blog-pen, here where we dwell in The Margins, to take a lovely phrase like 'Christian Cuddle' and make it drip with implied intimidation and unsettling intent, with undefined threat and ominous menace-Ed)...cheers...(and I just bet that you're now going to make the observation that this implication and/or intent define themselves-Ed)...argh ya' got me...(because ultimately, any implied threat says everything about the realities of those 'Christian Cuddles'-Ed)...absolutely Ed...('cos you merely alluding to the possibility of giving Steve mate a good ol' CC, if that is deemed in any way to be intimidating or threatening, or whatevs, then that says everything about those contacts as they occurred in that St Martins classroom-Ed)...spot on...
If all I have to do to invoke a sense of intense intent and impending unpleasantness is joke about giving Steve mate a good ol' Christian Cuddle, if that simple albeit heavily sarcastic joke can provoke such potential for concern, then what does it say about those cuddles?...(yeah, most people smile when they're joking...you are joking, aren't you?...Nick? you are joking?-Ed)...see the Disclaimer below...
Disclaimer 2:...anyone who knows me knows that I'm an often intense, sometimes angry, but always gentle person and that I ain't touching no-one...(well not without their express permission-Ed)...oh why is it always sex, sex, sex with you?...this whole CC spiel is entirely about confronting Cr Perryman's meme hypocrisy, and highlighted by the context of the 'Christian Cuddle' excuse/explanation from the Lutherans...
Tomorrow: (Let Me Guess, Hypocrisy?-Ed)...Correct...
And then, back to Venice and more f...(whoa whoa, slow down, this is not a gondola-laden, expletive-swamped pseudo-travelogue from the original cinema screenings of Monty Pythons' Life Of Brian movie-Ed)...that was truly hilarious...as was the trend of the time (early 1980s), movies often had a travelogue or other brief pre-feature item, and when we went to see LOB, we youngish lads (13/14 years) were amongst the many members of the audience who immediately 'tuned-out' and started chatting amongst ourselves...literally everyone missed the occasional 'odd' line, but we were uniformly jerked-back to reality about 9 minutes in, during a carriage ride through New York, when the commentary turned 'violent' before suddenly returning to Venice and "more f***ing gondolas"...it'd be fair to say that there was a stunned silence in the cinema as the f-bomb dropped, followed closely by the penny...this is available on Youtube...it seems a little trite now, knowing that it's MP doing it, what's coming, etc, but in the moment in that cinema, it was hilariously effective...
Thankyou for allowing me the indulgence of ending this very angry post on a deliberately random note, in this attempt at a slightly more pleasant tone...
I am Nick Fletcher and this is my blog...cheers and laters...
No comments:
Post a Comment