Sunday, October 28, 2018

Accessing Mental Health Services In Mt Gambier - Hopefully My Conspirital Paranoia, Not The Traumatising Reality

Howdy dear availees in the Seychelles, France, Indonesia, and Singapore, and of course all of ya's here in the South East of SA, gidday one and all, and welcome to a longish post, but there's several attached letters that are quite spread-out, so it's not really super-long, cheers...it's now Sunday arvo' at the end of the worst week I've had in many, many years, and I covered a lot of this stuff in the previous post about the rancid Pro-Paedophile manipulation and deceits of the Child Abuse Royal Commission...(you mean the farcical Federal CARC that ran for 5 years and refused to look at the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up even after several families provided lengthy written submissions with supporting documentation?-Ed)...that's the one, rejected us and our carefully documented submissions about the abuses our 7 year-old children had been subjected to by their St Martins Lutheran School teacher Glyn Dorling in 2002...(so, officially refused to look at St Martins?-Ed)...yep...(before going-on to not ask the Lutherans one single question?-Ed)...that's them, the Federal Child Abuse Royal Commission that refused to ask the Lutherans a single question...

And even if you somehow manage to convince ya'self that that failure to ask the Lutherans a single question and then barely mention them in it's Final Report, if you can somehow believe that that is just an unfortunate oversight by the FCARC, that self-deluding denial is put to the sword by the reality that the FCARC abjectly refused to look at the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up, rejecting multiple submissions...which leads me to ask...  

Who's Apologising To The Dozens Of Junior Primary Kids Glyn Dorling Abused At St Martins Lutheran School?

Who Is Apologising To The St Martins Kids That The FCARC Rejected?

Who Is Going To 'Financial Redress Scheme' The St Martins Kids That The FCARC Rejected?

And that's why I loathingly condemn the corruptly farcical FCARC and Julia Gillard for her cynical manipulation of deeply traumatised people...this FCARC was all about getting ahead of the increasing 'Social Media' exposure of the rankly Institutionalised Pro-Paedophile Corruption that defines Religion and Politics in this sick nation, and it has quite deliberately, cynically manipulated deeply traumatised abuse victims to achieve that...and again, I invite dear availees to prove me wrong, 'cos gourd knows I truly wish I was, but trawl through the FCARC's own Final Report and it's Interim Reports, like I have, go wherevs, read whatevs, and ultimately all you'll manage to do is prove this confronting reality for ya'selves...(yes, well that's all very relevant I'm sure, given the ludicrous carry-on about how fantastic the Commission and/or Gillard are, etc, but how does that relate to the title of this 'ere post?-Ed)...ah, I was gettin' there, eventually, but thanks for the nudge...

Largely as a result of the public abuse and general denigration I've been subjected to by various Lutherans and/or people involved with St Martins, all loaded-up on top of the base trauma of the abuse of my child at St Martins and the way that the Lutherans have covered-up that abuse...(with the unwavering support of SAPol (police) and the Crown Solicitor and SA Labor and Liberals, in fact, the SA Parliament et al, and the Teachers Registration Board, and rancidly corrupt lawyers like Peter Humphries and your bestie Bill DeGaris, etc, etc, etc-Ed)...yeah all of that that we include under the heading, The St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up, after suffering through all of that for a decade, I was shoved on to the Disability Support Pension several years ago, officially diagnosed with debilitating Agoraphobia and chronic Depression and Anxiety...

Now it's well known how difficult even onerous an exercise it is to be 'granted' the DSP, and that in and of itself somewhat quantifies how 'unwell' I've been...to the other extreme, people regularly comment as to my extraordinary strength that I can endure such massive trauma and abuse, etc, and yet still even function as a vaguely coherent person, let-alone one whom maintains a genuine sense of humour...and particularly given that it's not like that abuse and denigration pf me is historical, as evidenced by the truly sad individuals like MGCC Councillor Josh Lynagh and his pig-ignorant acolytes whom he repeatedly deceives, manipulates and winds-up on his "ambulance chaser" website...as sadly mis-informed and easily manipulated as these people are, and I truly do find it far more 'saddening' for them than it upsets or angers me, regardless, they remain a source of constant amusement for others who read their wildly erroneous assertions of fact about my conduct, the 'facts' about my 'Trial', etc, etc...(well if it weren't so sad it would be hilarious-Ed)...and that, Ed, that is exactly my position on the matter....but we digress, sort of...

The broader point I'm making here is thusly, this Agoraphobia stuff, etc, is as current for me today as it was 5-10 years ago, albeit, I have come a long, long way in fighting-back against it and 'armouring' myself against it, etc, and I've covered a lot of this stuff in recent posts...(you mean like the repeated confrontations, harassment and abuse of MGCC Councillor's, eg, when Cr Frank 'The Jellyfish Who Grew A Spine And Roared Like A Mouse From It's Ivory Tower' Morello bailed you up outside the September 2017 Council Full Meeting, threatened and abused you, and then Cr Mark Lovett, 'Manager' Nick Serle, and CEO Mark McShane came-out into the foyer area and joined in, and you quietly verbally eviscerated them?-Ed)...yep, just like that...(but then in April this year you encountered both Cr Lynagh and Cr Lovett, within minutes of each other, and you didn't need to say a word, didn't even feel the need to say a word, etc?-Ed)...exactly, all that stuff, because 1) I've been 'fighting' so long that it's become almost second nature, and 2) by 'fighting' I've established such a vast foundation of un-challengeable realities that I don't need to say a single word...

I am absolutely so proud of myself that I have 'fought' to a place where I don't need to say a word and I'm the one holding my head up and walking down the middle of the footpath, etc, and it's CEO McShane and Lynagh and Lovett and their ilk, they're the ones lookin' at the ground and not daring to utter a bloody word...(get in my son-Ed)...but it remains a daily 'confrontation' that I literally cannot leave my li'l abode without encountering one or more of these charming individuals, and that's why, for all I have achieved, and largely without help, that's why the Agoraphobia stuff is a constant for me...(and beyond that of course, is the constant discourse in the media about Child Abuse and the Royal Commission, etc, etc, etc-Ed)...indeed, and particularly this last coupla' weeks...

And on top of all of that was the breaking news this week that a Mt Gambier man has been "charged...with persistent sexual exploitation of a child"...and of course, because it's apparently known across the community because those involved wrote a letter asking for other people involved to keep quiet, etc, I've had people coming to me telling me who and where...but I first was asked/informed about this because Josh 'Ambulance Chaser' Lynagh put it on his Limestone Coast Community News Facebook page, apparently several days before it was 'reported' in The Border Watch newspaper, and apparently as a result of that letter...and I write 'reported' like that because TBW says 'we know all about it but we can't say for legal reasons'...and for that 'legal' reason alone I am not going to name the person or the place...not yet anyway, I'm not gunna' give these bastards the satisfaction of blaming me for a failed prosecution...(that's exactly what I was gunna' caution you about-Ed)...cheers mate, but I'm all over that sortta' bastardry because it's exactly what SAPol, et al, did to us families for talking about Glyn Dorling and the Lutherans...but I do know who and I do know where, and I will rain down on all of them like a rabid shower-a-shite if this doesn't go where it should...I know who you are and you know who I am, and you know that I ain't bluffing...

So with all that going on in the media, I have my own li'l disaster rollin' along with my 260hrs of Community Service and still-stalled attempt to 'Appeal' my rancidly corrupt 'Conviction' for talking about ICAC, etc...and that's where we get to the specifics of today's title, because I know as fact that I ain't the only one suffering through this cynical self-congratulation and relentless manipulation of the Federal Child Abuse Royal Commission and the 'Apology', etc, and in the midst of all of that renewed trauma, I am being told that I must attend Community Service, at Corrections Mt Gambier, or else I will be 'breached' and sent back before the rankly corrupt Magistrate Ian White who 'Ordered' me there in the first place...(is this the Community Service stuff where they're telling you you have to attend at Corrections Mt Gambier's workshop to make toys for the Anglicans to hand-out to the kiddies?-Ed)...yeah, the shreckin' Anglicans with their very current, very many issues of Child Abuse and Cover-ups, I'm supposed to go and make toys for them to hand-out to the kiddies...(wow, that's just wrong on so many levels-Ed)...well indeed it is, and others have noted exactly that, but it's only the deeply hypocritical end-point of the broader issue...

Also as others have put it to me, they are gob-smacked that I would be forced into a workshop with "the paedophiles, rapists, wife-bashers, and meth-heads from Mt Gambier Gaol", particularly given my "long history of activism on the paedophile stuff"...(it is extraordinary-Ed)...and I have put it exactly like that to Corrections Mt Gambier, and the response was "they're not all like that"...(wow-Ed)...indeed Ed, wow, and this is where the Agoraphobia stuff really kicks-off for me...but, despite the fact that Centrelink have just extended my DSP until at least November 2020, this is apparently "not current enough" for the Dept of Corrections, who refuse to accept that and have repeatedly demanded that I provide a "current Medical Certificate", even though they know that it is not physically possible for me to do so because the requisite 'Mental Health Services' do not exist in Mt Gambier, and even if I could access either Portland or Adelaide, that would be more than a year to get into those services and then multiple appointments to get that 'Medical Certificate'...(wow-Ed)...and that has left me scrambling to try and provide said 'Medical Certificate', with the resultant disaster that I have titled, Accessing Mental Health Services In Mt Gambier - Hopefully My Conspirital Paranoia, Not The Traumatising Reality...what I'm saying is, I'd rather that this 'disaster' were symptomatic of my broader Political Persecution and related "Malicious Prosecution", etc, because I'd rather that than it being a standard disaster that anyone else would encounter in simply trying to access Mental Health Services in Mt Gambier...  

And because I'm so sick and tired of my stuff just 'disappearing' out of my Corrections file, I have taken to putting this in writing, as attached below, and by the Friday, I was so frustrated and concerned that I resorted to faxing my letters just so I could prove that I had written/provided them...(faxed?-Ed)...yeah, according to their letters to me, Corrections Mt Gambier don't have an email address...(odd-Ed)...indeed, but that's why I faxed, well, the second reason I faxed, if you see what I mean...(sure, to prove delivery and because that's the only way-Ed)...yeah...so here's those 3 letters, slightly censored, see ya's in a bit...***

Ms Mignon Bruce
Area Manager, Southern Country Region
Delegate of the Chief Executive
114 Commercial St East
Mount Gambier SA 5290

Dear Ms Bruce,
I refer to your letter of 17th October 2018 (received by post Monday 22nd October 2018) stating that I am “required” and “directed” to attend the Mt Gambier Community Correctional Centre tomorrow, Friday 26th October, to commence my 260 hours of Community Service.

As the Department for Correctional Services is aware, I am currently on the Disability Support Pension, having been diagnosed with debilitating Agoraphobia, Depression, and Anxiety, as Magistrate Ian White was also well aware when he quite inappropriately made this Community Service Order.

The only thing I have been told by Corrections Mt Gambier, and then only verbally, is this ongoing diagnosis is not acceptable to Corrections because “it is not current enough”, despite the fact that the relevant diagnosis and multiple associated issues are an ongoing, daily situation for me.

Please find attached a copy of my latest DSP card from Centrelink, received only last week, clearly identifying that Centrelink accepts that my diagnosis/condition is ongoing and likely to continue for at least the next 2 years, until November 2020.

I have been to Centrelink repeatedly since Magistrate White made this Order, to access my records from them so as to be able to provide that to Corrections, but Centrelink has identified that they cannot direct me to other services, not least of all because those services don't exist locally, nor can they provide me any sort of Medical Certificate despite my ongoing DSP.

As the Department for Correctional Services Mt Gambier is aware it is simply not possible to just “get a more current diagnosis” or even a basic Medical Certificate to excuse me from attendance, because those very specific Mental Health services do not exist in Mt Gambier.

As directed by Corrections Mt Gambier, I am in the process of re-establishing a Mental Health Plan, but am still many months, possibly more than a year away from being 're-assessed' in a manner appropriate to receive any sort of formal 're-diagnosis' and associated formal Medical Certificate.

I refer to the specific Diagnosis Report of my former Counsellor Keith Smith (now deceased) as taken from my original diagnosis that saw Centrelink put me on the DSP in the first place;
      “Mr Fletcher would currently be unsafe in any work environment due to his multiple
       disorders and his verbal behaviours which are displayed when he becomes distressed.”

I have twice provided Corrections Mt Gambier with a copy of this Diagnosis Report (they 'misplaced' the first copy), and please note that it says that I am the one who is “unsafe”, not that I am a danger to others or anything like that, and my “verbal behaviours” are not yelling or threatening or anything like that, it is my habit of quietly challenging what I consider to be unacceptable conduct, language, etc.

As I discussed with Dr *******, it is not appropriate for him to provide me a specific Medical Certificate, he can only do what he is medically and/or legally allowed to do, and that is to help me access more appropriate services, but he has provided me a brief letter outlining my current situation in trying to access those services, copy attached.

Given the circumstances, I consider that it is grossly inappropriate for Magistrate White and/or Corrections to knowingly force me into a situation where I am “unsafe”, particularly in the context where Corrections know that the relevant Mental Health services they direct me to attend/access for a Medical Certificate, are simply unavailable in Mt Gambier.

As explained above, it could take many months before I am able to access/provide a formal Medical Certificate, but that Centrelink are still satisfied that I currently meet the very strict criteria for receiving the Disability Support Pension.

I therefore request that Corrections provide me a Formal Suspension of my Community Service Order until such time as I am able to provide the appropriate Mental Health diagnosis and/or formal Medical Certificate. Unfortunately I cannot say how long that might take, nor can Dr *******, so I can only apply for an interim Suspension, say of at least 3 (three) months.

I can only apologise for leaving this request to today, Thursday 25th October 2018, the day before I have been “directed” to commence Community Service, but as explained above, this is a very complicated and traumatic situation for me and I am doing the best I can in a context where I, the 'patient', are being forced to try and access these Mental Health services that are not available locally.

I have attached my phone number and other contact details below, and will make myself available all day, but respectfully anticipate that Corrections will acknowledge, 1) the ongoing reality of my personal situation, 2) Centrelink's continuation of my DSP, and 3) my genuine attempts to do as I have been directed by Corrections to re-establish a Mental Health Plan, etc, and grant me the requested Interim Formal Suspension for an initial period of 3 months.

***...and that was hand-delivered at 0930hrs Thursday 25th October, and Corrections Mt Gambier left me a phone message at 1720hrs, rejecting my 'application' and telling me to 'show-up tomorrow' as explained further just below...***


Dear Ms Bruce,
As per my letter yesterday, Thursday 25th October 2018, and my application for a Suspension of my Community Service Order as it relates to my diagnosed Agoraphobia, Depression, and Anxiety, and Centrelink's recent renewal of my Disability Support Pension until November 2020.

I hand-delivered that letter to Corrections Mt Gambier along with the letter from my doctor and a copy of my new DSP card, and spoke briefly to my case manager, who stated that she 'did not understand' why my GP would not provide a standard Medical Certificate, stating “we get them all the time”.

My case manager said that she would review my request and get back to me later in the day, but that I also needed to make another appointment with my doctor to get “the appropriate Medical Certificate”.

Immediately after leaving I made that appointment as directed, albeit it's with a different doctor at the same clinic because that's the only appointment that was available; that will be at 0945hrs today, Friday 26th October 2018.

My case manager finally called at 1720hrs yesterday, leaving a message that my request for a Formal Suspension had been denied, and that I must attend this morning.

The lateness of this call denied me any opportunity to take any further action, and I cannot say what the doctor will do today, but due to my 0945hrs appointment I will obviously not be attending at Corrections Mt Gambier at 0900hrs as directed.

This past week with it's multiple Child Abuse issues, eg, the National Apology and the (recent child abuse case referred to above-NF) for 'extended sexual exploitation' of (as above-NF), has been one of the worst I've had for many years, greatly exacerbating my trauma and anxiety issues.

Yesterday I had a massive 'panic attack' when I ran into a local former radio employee who was/is one of many local 'identities' who are complicitly involved in covering-up the gross abuse of my child and dozens of other grade 2 children by their teacher in 2002, (******** ****** *****-NF).

I felt driven to confront that 'identity' about their rank corruption and the massive trauma it has brought into the lives of many families in Mt Gambier, etc, and this is exactly the behaviour referred to in my diagnosis, namely my “verbal behaviours”.

This is exactly the sort of contact and response that causes me such intense trauma and makes me “unsafe” in these very confronting situations.

As per today's doctor appointment, I will contact Corrections Mt Gambier as soon as possible regarding the outcome of my appointment today.

Also, I request a written explanation as to why my Agoraphobia, Depression, and Anxiety diagnosis and Centrelink's related renewal of my Disability Support Pension are considered not relevant and/or “not current enough” for the Dept of Corrections, who are subsequently forcing me into a situation where you/they know that I am “unsafe”, as identified in my original diagnosis.

As described above, it is fundamentally incorrect to state that that diagnosis is “not current enough” because it is an ongoing and daily issue for me, as yesterday's incident traumatically illustrated.

In such a small town, I have similar encounters literally every time I leave the house, and it's the relentlessly inevitable nature of incidents like that that have driven me into the diagnosed Agoraphobia.

How is it appropriate for Dept of Corrections to make what is effectively a medical decision that over-rides and contradicts both my official diagnosis, and Centrelink's continuing acceptance of that diagnosis, particularly given the very strict criteria Centrelink have for the Disability Support Pension?

Again, please provide me written answers to these specific questions, as I only have vague verbal statements about these issues, and that is not good appropriate given the confusion and trauma this situation is causing me.

I have continually done exactly as asked by Corrections Mt Gambier, attended every appointment, even re-established a Mental Health Plan as requested, etc, but none of it is apparently enough.

This letter will be faxed to your contact number (08) 8725 0923 by 0830hrs today, Friday 26th October 2018, as formal notification that I will not be attending at 0900hrs, and as stated, I will contact Corrections Mt Gambier again as soon as I have any further information.

***...a coupla' things removed there, including some personal stuff I'm not posting about...needless to say that I didn't 'confront' the ABC's Stan Thompson, and I'm damn proud of how I ultimately managed that hugely traumatising encounter, deferring as I did to the implications for others directly involved, and walking away without saying a word...(well done sir-Ed)... after that appointment I again wrote/faxed Corrections Mt Gambier...***

Dear Ms Bruce,
As per my letter earlier today Friday 26th October 2018, faxed to your office from a local newsagent at 0822hrs, a fax for which I have retained the dated and timed receipt.

As outlined in my original letter this morning, I have now attended yet another doctor appointment, as I was directed to do by my case manager, who yesterday re-stated that I had to get a Medical Certificate.

As previously explained, my GP has declined to provide any such certificate because they 'are not legally or medically qualified/allowed to do so', stating that I have to wait for the “appropriate” Service Provider to give me any certificate.

As you are aware, this refers to my current efforts to re-establish a Mental Health Plan, again as directed by Corrections Mt Gambier, a process which thus-far has involved multiple GP visits for a referral to a Berri-based psychology service which has a sub-office in Mt Gambier, and to a Melbourne-based psychiatric service.

As Corrections Mt Gambier and my GP are aware, the psychology service has already stated that ultimately they will still not be able (not qualified) to provide any specific (certificate).

As Corrections Mt Gambier are also aware, I am still in the 'triage' stage and when this process formally begins it will take months of appointments for any formal re-diagnosis; and I say re-diagnosis because as Magistrate Ian White and the Dept of Corrections is already aware, I am currently on the Disability Support Pension after being diagnosed with chronic Agoraphobia, Depression and Anxiety.

Yesterday I provided the letter from my GP, as per my appointment from Wednesday 24th October, and my Corrections Mt Gambier case manager rejected it stating that it wasn't good enough and that I needed a proper Medical Certificate, and when I re-explained the GP's refusal to do so, my case manager stated “I don't understand (why)”, continuing that “we get them all the time”, including with cases of Depression, etc.

At today's 'emergency' appointment, a different doctor at the same clinic repeated the exact same explanation/reasoning of my GP, and again refused to provide me any sort of Medical Certificate, not even a certificate for today's visit.

The doctor today cited 'the legal aspects' and involvement of Corrections, stating that my situation was “so complicated”, and then directed me to 'go back to Corrections and get them to contact your GP for further information', as stated/offered in that letter of Wednesday 24th October, a letter already rejected by my case manager.

I specifically identified my case manager's statement that “we get them (Medical Certificates) all the time” and the ensuing direction that I go and get one, but the doctor repeatedly refused, referring me back to my GP and telling me to contact Corrections myself; this conversation went round and round for several minutes.

I expressed my confusion and distress to the doctor and how this increasingly circular and farcical situation was drastically exacerbating rather than resolving my Mental Health issues, but they could only repeat their advice, telling me to contact Corrections and get them to contact my GP.

So that is what I am doing, writing to you to get you to contact my GP, as offered by my GP in that letter 24th October 2018, and who's contact details you already have.

I repeat for the record, Magistrate White and the Dept of Corrections are both fully aware of the hugely negative implications for me in trying to force me into a situation where they both know that I will be “unsafe”, as per my original Agoraphobia diagnosis.

Furthermore, I re-iterate my request from this morning's letter that I immediately be provided with a written explanation as to why my current diagnosis and associated Disability Support Pension status are considered to be irrelevant by the Dept of Corrections.

I also request that all further communications from the Dept of Corrections be in writing, not unspecific and unaccountable phone calls or conversations that say things like 'turn-up or else'.

I remind Corrections Mt Gambier that earlier this year I was verbally told that I had been “breached”, but that that subsequently proved to be incorrect, none of which has been specifically explained to me, and nor have I received an apology for the great distress that caused me; I would also like an explanation of that in writing.

Please follow the instructions I have been given at my 'emergency visit' this morning, and contact my GP, and in the absence/refusal of a Medical Certificate, the clinic will also be able to confirm that I have attended that appointment this morning.

Yours,

***...(wow-Ed)...yep, wow, being directed to get a Medical Certificate in circumstances where I've been repeatedly refused one, yet directed back there again, with the same result, and then again, with the same result, repeatedly and in a context where my DSP/Agoraphobia stuff is apparently irrelevant, to all involved...and as I say, I'd rather that this were some sort of 'Conspirital Persecution' of me rather than standard procedure in trying to access Mental Health Services...I have immense resilience due to my prolonged exposure to the traumas and official abuse and/or failings, etc, etc, and whilst it really knocks me around and tires me out, etc, there's simply no avoiding that, but I have the experience and endurance to ride it out and to get up and go again...(and again-Ed)...yep...(and again and again-Ed)...yeah, don't labour the point Ed, but imagine if this was happening to someone who was freshly traumatised and/or consumed by their trauma or ill health, etc, how is that poor bastard gunna' negotiate their way through that nonsense?...

Tomorrow: We'll Revisit This Issue Somewhat

I am Nick Fletcher and this is my blog, and I ain't kidding, I genuinely hope that my experience is the extreme 'bottom-end' of Mental Health Service Provision in Mt Gambier, but unfortunately, I'm assured that it ain't...and on that sombrely sobering note, cheers and laters...


Oh, PS, I haven't had any response from Dept of Corrections to my 2 letters from Friday...

Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Julia Gillard's Intimately Complicit Role In The St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up

Howdy dear availees...I know we promised various things for this next post, eg, those reprehensibly vile 'Suppression/Restraining Orders' from the rankly corrupt Magistrate Ian White...(actually, I thought we were going to cover the rancid deceits and manipulations of this 'Mt Gambier Indoor Pool' debasco (debacle/fiasco)?-Ed)...indeed, that one too...and we will get to them, but yesterday interrupted our plans...(what, you mean the farcically cynical displays from our wholly disingenuous politicians and this sickly manipulative 'Child Abuse Royal Commission Apology'?-Ed)...yep, that's the one...what a deplorable display of fakely-forced emotion, particularly the disgraceful fake crying from that glassy-eyed god-botherer PM Scott Morrison...you PM, you sir, are a bloody disgrace...(mate, I don't think it's fair to make fun of him because he wears glasses-Ed)...I'm not mate, I'm talking about the spectacularly disingenuous spectacle going-on just behind the spectacles...(ah, fair enough-Ed)...

But the most stupifyingly sick display was from former PM Julia Gillard...gender politics be hanged, she is an absolute shocker on a par with the worst that Canberra can spew-up...(I thought you had previously stated that it was the South Australian Pro-Paedophile lobby who had made her this countries' first female Prime Minister, and that she was a horrendous operator who readily manipulated 'reverse-sexism' in bleating about how she doesn't get treated fairly?-Ed)...yep, all of that, and as horrendously bigotted and 'sexist' as some of the language was that was used to attack her, eg, 'Ditch The Witch', she is as atrocious a human-being as any of the clowns who attacked her thusly...(so what your saying is, is that she is a corrupt, deceitful, Pro-Paedophile politician who absolutely deserves to be roundly abused, but abused in a non-gendered manner?-Ed)...exactly...(despite the fact that she milks the 'misogyny' and 'sexism' stuff for all it's worth, relentlessly using it to manipulate the discussion and avoid genuine accountability?-Ed)...couldn't have said it better myself...

So here again, dear Julia mate, here's the proof positive that you are as intimately complicit in the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up as any of the other rankly corrupt stooges involved, eg, Tony Pasin, Rory McEwen, Mike Rann, Jay Weatherill, Michael Atkinson, Kevin Foley, Rob Kerin Rob Lucas, Vicki Chapman, Peter Gandolfi, Don Pegler...(the local politician you're not allowed to discuss due to those reprehensibly vile 'Suppression/Restraining Orders'-Ed)...yeah, that person, Gary Costello, Jim and Viv and Kyam Maher, Ted Mullighan (dec), etc, etc, etc, et al, ad infinitum...and of course, Jane Lomax-Smith...


...to which Jane mate responded with this lie-riddled and dismissive missive...


...an absolutely lie-riddled response, as covered in some early posts in this 'ere blog...(assuming those posts haven't also mysteriously disappeared-Ed)...well indeed, and that's why I've included it, if not evisceratingly dissecting each corrupt lie, but Jane mate...(maaate-Ed)...knows what she's done...(indeed, she's a right piece a' work-Ed)...anyhoos, this deceitful and dismissive response led to Mr Secker writing to Julia Gillard, then Federal Labor's Education Minister...


...and here 'tis that letter to Education Minister Julia Gillard...



...to which my mate Julia Gillard replied...

And so there it is, proof positive that Julia Gillard knew/knows about the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up...and her response, 'oh dear, how sad, not my problem'...(what an extraordinary response, let alone from a South Australian spawned politician, SA being the state where the Lutherans have their head office, and from where they operate schools and churches nationally-Ed)...spot on, and then as Prime Minister, my mate Julia...(maaate-Ed)...convenes a farcically cynical and definably corrupted Pro-Paedophile Child Abuse Royal Commission that doesn't just flatly refuse to look at the St Martins Cover-up despite submissions from several families, but then doesn't ask the Lutherans a single question, and barely mentions them in it's Final Report...(wow-Ed)...

And that's why I hate Julia Gillard, and that's why I found her smug simpering self-centred 'oh it's not about me' bullshit so infuriating and traumatic...(well mate, when you know exactly who she is and what she's done, of course it's gunna' be traumatic and confronting and infuriating, etc, it's just to be expected, unfortunately-Ed)...cheers mate, that helps, a little...

Tomorrow: Whatevs, I'm Too Knackered To Focus Right Now...(And Too Angry To Care?-Ed)...Well Yeah, A Bit A' That...

I am Nick Fletcher and this is my blog, and that's your/our first female PM...(charming ain't it-Ed)...yeah, sorry...(mate, it's not your fault...I mean, is that stuff truthful and accurate?-Ed)...well sure, of course it is, as unfortunately truthful and accurate as everything else in the 5.5 years of this 'ere blog...(so your only responsibility is that you identify and expose this stuff?-Ed)...well I s'pose, if you put it like that...(I do, in fact, plenty of people do-Ed)...orrr, cheers mate...(no no, cheers to you mate, cheers and laters-Ed)...sure, cheers and laters...

Sunday, October 21, 2018

Nick Fletcher - The Invisible $540,000 Criminal - More SA ICAC Corruption

Howdy dear availees in United Arab Emirates, Ukraine, India, and Pakistan, and to y'all else, welcome to a genuinely super-short post...(ooor gourd no, here we go-Ed)...what?!...(well every time you say that you reel-off into an extended and exuberant uber-rant intimately illustrating every insidious intricacy of whatevs it is you're pissed-off about today-Ed)...yeah, fair point, but today it's a super-short post, promise...(welllll, okayyy-Ed)...with several days of homework /research for availees to do...(and there you have it, I damn well knew it-Ed)...settle petal, I'm just yankin' ya' chain, the reality is that this homework/research is gunna' take just exactly as long as it takes to type-in a couple of specific 'search terms' and peruse the 'zero' responses...(mmm, still not convinced-Ed)...well maybe this will help, here's the 'search terms'...

Dear availees, the Federal Child Abuse Royal Commission is a sickly cynical manipulation, introduced by the deeply corrupted and Pro-Paedophile compromised Julia Gillard and 'her' Labor government...I remind y'all that, like Liberals's Education Minister Julie Bishop before her, when Julia Gillard was Labor's Education Minister she responded to (then) Liberal Member for Barker Patrick Secker's letters/enquiries about the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up with a 'gee-whiz, how sad, but not my responsibility' letter...(is that the one where-in she refused/failed to respond to your letters, sent concurrently to Mr Secker's, and you had to go to Mr Secker's office for a copy of Gillard's 'not my problem, get stuffed' response?-Ed)...that's the one...so SA-based Julia Gillard refused to address the SA-based Lutheran's definably Pro-Paedophile corruption with the St Martins Cover-up, and then Julia, mate, established the Royal Commission, a farcically manipulative and rancidly cynical attempt to say 'all this abuse stuff happened aways back there somewhere in the past and golly we're all really really sorry and everything's fine now, just fine'...(it really is quite sick isn't it-Ed)...definably Pro-Paedophile sick Ed...

And the fundamental defining reality of that deeply cynical agenda is the conduct of the Royal Commission itself...at least 3 families involved with the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up, myself included, provided lengthy written submissions and supporting documentation about the daily abuses our 7 year old children were subjected to by teacher Glyn Dorling at St Martins, and the resultant cover-up by the Lutherans and the rankly Pro-Paedophile complicit conduct of SAPol (police), the Rann/Weatherill Labor government, the rankly corrupt Teachers Registration Board, the rancidly corrupt Crown Solicitors Office, SA's own Child Abuse Royal Commissioner Ted Mulligan, et al, and the Federal Royal Commission rejected our submissions and refused to look at the St Martins Cover-up at all...(wow, that is just extraordinary, and you are quite right, it absolutely defines the true nature of the Federal Royal Commission-Ed)...indeed, and furthermore and even more damning, the FRC went-on to completely ignore the Lutherans, not calling them to give evidence or ask them one single official question...(wow, now that's some serious Pro-Paedophile corruption right there-Ed)...absolutely Ed, and not just the opinion of a deeply traumatised and wildly furious parent, because here's where the homework/research bit comes in...

And we here at TMGI have already requested/directed regular availees to peruse the Federal Royal Commission's various Interim Reports and/or their Final Report and try to find a single mention of the Lutherans...(well I've been doing that ever since it began back in 2012/13, and all I ever found were some Lutheran teachers complaining that they weren't 'safe', and several legalistic Lutheran submissions relating to points of law, etc-Ed)...and one single mention under 'Other Organisations' in the Final Report...(well yeah that-Ed)...but not one actual FRC question to/of the Lutherans...(nah, nuthin'-Ed)...absolutely nuthin'...the Federal Royal Commission has allowed the Lutheran Church, arguably the most powerful religious body in this country...(well certainly powerful enough to be able to organise a FRC that carefully avoids asking them a single question-Ed)...my point exactly Ed, powerful enough to organise the Gillard Labor government into convening a rancidly corrupt Federal Royal Commission that didn't ask them, the Lutherans, one question...  

And the Australian media is so rampantly complicit that supposedly not one single journalist, not one single media organisation in this country has managed to spot that glaring omission/reality...(well one has-Ed)...what?!...(one has-Ed)...orrr yeah, and where's that mate? I haven't seen it...(ummm, well, it's us isn't it, TMGI-Ed)...oh, beg pardons, of course Ed, sorry, you're absolutely right, there's one 'media organisation' in this country that's spotted and reported the FRC's refusal/failure to ask the Lutherans a single question, and it's TMGI...(and it's exactly that sort of pointin'-out the bleedin' obvious that others refuse to address, it's that sortta' behaviour, that's why you end-up being subject to a rancidly Corrupt "Malicious Prosecution" at the hands of SA's rankly corrupt ICAC-Ed)...well exactly Ed, and I couldn't have imagined a better segue straight into the second round of research/homework for dear availees...

Dear Availees:...My Bestie And Also In His Spare Time ICAC Commissioner Bruce 'Brews Slander' Lander has just released his official 2017/18 Report, and take a wild guess who ain't got a guernsey, ain't got a shout-out, ain't even got a passing mention, again...(well I'm guessing you, obviously, not least of all from your tone and the look on your face, but 'again'?-Ed)...I have been the subject of ICAC/SAPol 'Operation Baritone' since January/February 2014, and officially on 'Trial' since February 2nd 2015...(albeit without being actually Charged or even Summonsed-Ed)...yeah sure, despite all that, but still my 'Trial' commenced February 2015, and ran for nearly 40 Hearing Dates...(not including the actual 11 full-day 'Trial' dates-Ed)...indeed, something around 50 'Trial Dates' all-up, all that starting January 2014 and running multiple Hearing Dates from February 2015, through 2016, 2017, and into April 2018...(arguably the longest 'Trial' in South Australian legal history-Ed)...well quite, and yet I don't rate a single mention in any of my mate Bruce's Annual Reports...(not even after your extraordinary 'Conviction on 18 Counts' and subsequent maximum $30k/count, totalling $540,000 fine?-Ed)...nope, not one word...    

The longest 'Trial' in Sow Strayan history, 3 different Magistrates...(including Her Honour Teresa Anderson who 'recused' herself after reading your 100 Document "Malicious Prosecution" submission, where-in HH had used the term "Malicious Prosecution" when HH 'Ordered' that you do that submission/presentation-Ed)...yep, all that, and not a single mention of li'l ol' moi in any ICAC Annual Report from 2014/15, 2015/16, 2016/17, or even 2017/18...(so in February-April 2018 you've been 'Convicted' of 18 Counts of breaching the ICAC Act 2012 Section 56, the precedent Prosecution/Conviction of Section 56, and fined a massive maximum $540,000, and none of that gets a single mention in Bruce's 2017/18 Annual Report?-Ed)...absolutely...oh look, damn it, here's the section from Bruce's 2017/18 Annual Report that covers 'Convictions' from the 2017/18 period...  



...so there you have it...and please note 1) that these cases straddle my February-April 2018 'Conviction', and that 2) Frank Templeton, of Mt Gambier, found guilty of multiple counts of de-frauding government contracts, was not even fined, but instead received a Good Behaviour Bond of only $500, money I understand he gets returned after that 18 months...(and that doesn't even take into account the various contractors and/or clients he ripped-off-Ed)...well indeed, continuing to accept monies and run-up debts whilst effectively insolvent, and then just shutting-up shop owing various people various amounts...disgraceful conduct involving outright Fraud gets a $500 GBB, yet that heinous criminal type, Nick Fletcher, is fined $540,000 then commuted to 260hrs Community Service, with a 'Victims of Crime' fee of $2800, and Court Costs of $300...(so actual Fraud is $500 GBB, but telling the truth about a supposed ICAC investigation of Mt Gambier City Council's rank corruption, that's a $540,000 fine?-Ed)...exactly...

And I also note that my 2015-2018 'Trial', subsequent 'Conviction', and $540,000 fine, and all the nonsense involved, that has been repeatedly reported in the local The Border Watch newspaper and on the ABC South East Radio...(both of whom were SAPol Prosecution witnesses in your 'Trial'-Ed)...well quite, but apart from that, and apart from that one article in The Australian in May 2014, my 'Trial/Conviction' has not been mentioned in any media outside of the South East, not even Adelaide, and certainly not interstate...(and that's despite others repeatedly contacting interstate media with your stuff-Ed)...indeed, it's not an ignoring founded in ignorance, it's a straight-out refusal to report it...Australia's media; apparently can't see the gross failings of the Federal Royal Commission in not asking the Lutherans a single question, nor can they see the "Malicious Prosecution" of my "bizarre trial" or it's outrageous outcome...what does that tell ya'?... 

Tomorrow: The Latest Mt Gambier City Council 'Indoor Pool' Deceits

Starring our other bestie, Liberal Member for Barker Tony Pasin...this whole farcical process is a deeply cynical and manipulative exercise in blatant 'pork-barrelling' deceits and manipulation, with Mt Gambier residents set to pay the price, literally, for decades to come...

I am Nick Fletcher and this 'ere is my blog, and challenging community leaders on their deeply self-interested deceits and manipulations of the Mt Gambier community, that's not 'talking-down' the community, that's knowingly exposing one's self to constant abuse and putting one's own well-being last in genuinely pursuing the actual best interests of the community...(damn straight it is!-Ed)...and at any time I'm more than happy to take these clowns on téte-a-téte in public debate on any of these issues, and particularly this 'Indoor Pool' debasco (debacle meets fiasco)...(they'll never do it mate, 'cos they know the verbal dismantling they're in for-Ed)...well exactly...anyhoos dear availees, cheers and laters...

Tuesday, October 16, 2018

Insidious Commissioner Assisting Corruption - Parte Deux

Howdy France, Germany, Russia, and United Arab Emirates, and to y'all other dear availees...just a quick intro 'cos, as promised, here's some more stuff about the recent farcical carry-on between ICAC and SA's Attorney General Vicki Chapman, as copy/pasted from the InDaily website...I repeat, this is still only some of the many stories available for y'all perusal simply by going all Google-eyed with the appropriate search terms...happy hunting, and we'll be back at the end of these 2 rather long articles...(we will?-Ed)...yes, we will...please note critical issues like the descriptor "farcical", and "everyone is too scared to breathe a word lest they somehow transgress the Act", and the "special flourish" of SA's secret-squirrel ICAC legislation, and the AG's secretive Crown Law advice about how she's supposedly not breached the Act, and of course the issue where-in making statements about 'not being able to comment' immediately indicates ICAC involvement...(and back to "farcical"-Ed)...well quite...***

Richardson: Chapman breaks the first rule of SA’s ‘Fright Club’

Opinion

There has always been something of the ‘Fight Club’ dictum about the legislation governing the state’s Independent Commissioner Against Corruption.

It’s evidently a convoluted Act: convoluted enough to throw the SA press gallery into collective confusion in recent days, as well as sending the state’s first law officer, Attorney-General Vickie Chapman, off to seek Crown Law advice about her own actions.
But if you’re looking for a handy rule of thumb, I’ll refer you to a few words I wrote on the subject almost four years ago:

“The first rule of ICAC is you do not talk about ICAC. The second rule of ICAC is you do not talk about ICAC.
“You can’t. I can’t. Even the Premier can’t. Only the ICAC commissioner Bruce Lander can talk about ICAC.
“So when he does, it’s kind of a big deal.”
Which, indeed, it is.
Not least when he’s claiming that he expressly told the Attorney-General not to talk publicly about ICAC, mere moments before she took it upon herself to (yep, you guessed it) publicly talk about ICAC.
Thereafter, Chapman steadfastly refused to comment on the matter at all for almost five days after InDaily first reported Lander’s comments – and then, having released a supplementary statement exonerating herself of a legal breach on the basis of Crown Law advice, declined to detail her version of the conversation with the Commissioner.
Thus, one can only ponder how and why this all happened.
Maybe Chapman was suffering some kind of ‘Basil Fawlty syndrome’, reminiscent of when the brusque hotelier’s determination not to mention the war prompted him to inadvertently and disastrously mention it at the earliest opportunity.
Indeed, I can almost hear Chapman counselling colleagues in a Basil-esque conspiratorial whisper when cabinet met earlier this week: “Look, whatever you do, don’t mention the ICAC… I mentioned it once, but I think I got away with it alright.”
Which, indeed, she has.
In part, because it all transpired on a weekend in which such legal minutiae were drowned out by the AFL Grand Final and an ensuing public holiday, and with two weeks before the matter could be tested in the safer confines of parliament.
In part, too, because some sections of the SA media seem to think the plausible possibility that an Attorney-General has breached an act of parliament is less significant than the hypocrisy of the Opposition making mileage out of it because they happened to introduce the act.
Which is an odd gambit, the logical extension of which is that politicians are henceforth allowed to break any laws that were introduced by opposing parties in government.

Could be fun.
But moreover, she got away with it because the law itself is indeed cumbersome, convoluted and restrictive, and almost everyone – including, as InDaily reported this week, Lander himself – now feels it needs revisiting (although that view is not held, ironically, by Chapman herself).
There is a noticeable sense since the long-awaited ICAC was finally introduced – in a particularly secretive guise, a uniquely SA flourish courtesy of then-Attorney John Rau – that everyone is walking on eggshells.
We could call it SA’s own ‘Fright Club’: everyone is too scared to breathe a word lest they somehow transgress the Act.
Because the first rule of ICAC is you do not talk about ICAC. (And that’s also the second rule, FYI.)

Premier Steven Marshall with Attorney-General Vickie Chapman in parliament. 
Photo: David Mariuz /AAP

Which makes Chapman’s peculiar statement citing ICAC all the more bizarre, because she didn’t merely tread on eggshells – she determinedly trampled them. And then spent the ensuing days wiping the proverbial egg from her face.
Let’s just take a potted (and dutifully redacted) debrief of recent events.
This all began when Planning Minister Stephan Knoll sent an unsolicited statement to The Advertiser, announcing that two of his executives in Renewal SA had taken leave.
Nothing wrong with that, of course. Some of my best friends take leave.
I point out that the statement was unsolicited, incidentally, not to denigrate The Advertiser (which I do from time to time), nor to deny them the giddy thrill of repeatedly claiming to have ‘revealed’ the story (which, technically, they did), but because it is significant to how this all played out.
Was this rather odd statement made out of necessity in response to media inquiries? Or was it a pre-emptive strike, to absolve the Government of later claims of ‘cover-up’?
The latter, it seems.
But, given the subsequent media headlines were hogged by the sound and fury of Labor attack dog Tom Koutsantonis’s bullish questions to Knoll in parliament last week, perhaps the most quietly revealing query came from his offsider, Tony Piccolo: “Why did you find it necessary to make a public statement when your senior executives are going on leave? How often do you do that?”
To which Knoll was obliged to concede: “This is the first time that I have made a statement in relation to that.”
He went on to say that he had “made the statement that was appropriate for us to say in relation to this issue”.
Which issue was that?
“The issue that the [executives] are on leave.”
And so on.
It’s arguable, of course, that releasing a strange statement and then refusing to say anything more about it is in itself tacitly raising the ghostly presence of ICAC in people’s minds, albeit without breaking the first rule of ICAC (which is, that you don’t talk about ICAC).
Ironically, all the Government’s missteps in the past fortnight seem predicated on trying to hold true to their mantra of openness and transparency – before quickly retreating into closed ranks and opaqueness when everything went awry.
While this has been, to be fair, a situation not of their making, it is quite some accomplishment to then somehow turn it into a complete own-goal.
There are clearly questions about judgment here
Knoll would have been far better served waiting until his estimates hearing to reveal – under privilege – that he was having a little local staffing difficulty, and that there was nothing more he could say on the matter at that time.
He could have credibly argued that he informed the parliament – the most appropriate forum for such an evidently sensitive disclosure – at the earliest possible moment, and would certainly not have endured the same barrage of questions that followed.
Similarly, Chapman thereafter would have been far better served doing what everyone else –including media – was already doing, and following the first rule of Fright Club.
Because, even if we take her secretive Crown Law advice as gospel about whether or not the ICAC Act has been breached, there are clearly questions about her judgment here.
According to Lander – whose recollection of the conversation is the only one we currently have – Chapman agreed not to “include reference to the ICAC [in] any statement made”, but to “say publicly that neither she nor the government could comment”.
“I told her that I would not be making a statement,” Lander insists.
She then went and did the exact opposite – explicitly referencing ICAC.
Lander, reluctantly, did make a statement.
There are credible arguments about the workability of the laws, but that doesn’t mean it’s ok for the Attorney-General to flout them.
And it’s certainly not ok to ask the Commissioner for advice, and then do the precise opposite of what he advises.
Worth noting, too, that Chapman is a serial offender in this sort of kerfuffle.
Just back in August, she elicited a strong response from River Murray royal commissioner Bret Walker, who wrote to her outlining his concern about the timing of a Federal Government High Court challenge to his summonsing of officials, and what that would mean for his reporting timeframes.
Chapman then sent out a media release announcing Walker would be withdrawing his summonses, as he had “advised that he is able to complete his report without pressing for the production of Commonwealth witnesses or documents, as he has received further evidence on which he can rely”.
Walker went about as ballistic as Royal Commissioners are wont to go, demanding an apology for Chapman’s “wrong, discourteous and inappropriate” statement.
“The media release should be completely withdrawn,” he said in a letter to the A-G. “I am owed an apology.”
So yes, Chapman mentioned the ICAC but, like Basil, she seems to have gotten away with it – albeit amid chaos of Fawlty Towers proportions.
But the A-G can probably count herself lucky.
It’s one thing to breach the law on a well-intentioned misstep.
It’s another to thumb one’s nose altogether at the advice of the state’s anti-corruption commissioner.
With any luck, this episode will prompt some re-evaluation of the ICAC Act, but in the meantime, if you can’t understand the law, you can at least follow the first rule of Fright Club.
Namely, that you don’t talk about ICAC.
Tom Richardson is a senior reporter at InDaily
***...and that last bit sums it all up really, 'you don't talk about Fright Club', which is the exact intent of South Australia's openly Fascist ICAC legislation, to openly threaten public servants, et al, with prosecution/persecution for merely discussing corruption...(where "et al" includes private citizens like your good self-Ed)...and if you report corruption it immediately disappears into ICAC and you are immediately banned from even discussing it...this is what SA ICAC is designed to do and how it operates, to scare people into not even reporting corruption and if they do, then to put the frighteners on them with threats of prosecution and massive fines...(like the $540,000 you were fined, $30k/count, a fine that remains the precedent punishment because Magistrate Ian White commuted that to 260hrs Community Service because you ain't got no money-Ed)...again, absolutely correct Ed, that's what he did and why he did it, therefore leaving $30,000 per count as the precedent punishment...if he'd reduced it to a reasonable and manageable level, eg, $1,000/count, that would allow future victims of this rankly corrupt ICAC legislation to argue to have that amount applied to their 'Convictions', but as it stands, the Government/ICAC can now still threaten people with $30,000 per count, with a precedent 'Conviction' to back it up...(kinda' clever really, in a rankly corrupt and Fascist way-Ed)...indeed...*** 





Chapman doesn't support new changes to ICAC secrecy

Local

Attorney-General Vickie Chapman is lukewarm about calls to revisit the secrecy provisions of the state’s ICAC laws – despite almost falling foul of them herself in recent days.
Chapman was forced to seek legal advice after anti-corruption commissioner Bruce Lander revealed he told her not to mention his integrity agency in a media statement last week.
Her subsequent statement explicitly mentioned ICAC in relation to an ongoing investigation, forcing Lander to release his own statement authorising media to publish it.
Fronting reporters today, Chapman repeated her insistence that “I’ve had very clear advice on this matter and I’m perfectly satisfied there is no breach of the ICAC Act”.


But she would not be drawn as to whether her statement would have constituted a breach of the law if the Commissioner had not given his subsequent assent.
Asked whether she would have breached the ICAC Act if Lander hadn’t authorised her statement retrospectively, Chapman told reporters: “I have very clear advice on this matter – I have not breached the ICAC Act.”
Lander told InDaily this week a change to the laws governing ICAC “needs to be considered” after questions about Renewal SA executives prompted a farcical chain of events last week, with Planning Minister Stephan Knoll unwilling to answer basic staffing questions and media unable to report on matters raised in parliament.
Chapman acknowledged today: “What is clear… is that there are a number of deficiencies with the legislation, and as soon as we came into office the Commissioner raised a number of areas of amendment that he would seek.”
However, she said the Marshall Government was giving “priority to public [maladministration] hearings and that’s what we’re advancing first”.
Optional open hearings for maladministration cases was a key election commitment by the Liberal Opposition, with the party introducing a bill to amend the Act accordingly.
“We have been fighting for years for aspects of this operation to have the right to public hearings and let the public understand what’s happening in relation to those investigations,” Chapman said today.
“But if [Lander] has concerns otherwise in relation to matters that may need further amendment, we’ll add them to the list.”

Section 56 of the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act states that a person “must not, except as authorised by the Commissioner in this case, publish or cause to be published information tending to suggest that a particular person is, has been, may be or may have been the subject of a complaint, report, assessment, investigation or referral under this Act”.

Of the secrecy provision, Chapman said: “I think that’s been an issue of management since the Act came into being, so that’s an issue that clearly we can have a look at further.”
But, she added, “we have supported the concept of non-disclosure when matters are referred in the past – and that’s an aspect of the original bill that we supported”.
“But if there are other amendments and other areas of reform that the Commissioner would like to advance, the usual process of those would be that they’d go through the parliament’s public integrity committee, and there would be some scrutiny in relation to how that might affect the operation of the Act generally,” she said.


“Should there be other matters of reform which Mr Lander or others want to present as necessary reform, we’re happy to receive them.”
Chapman has long backed the secrecy provisions of the ICAC Act, and has in the past railed against statements such as that made by Planning Minister Stephan Knoll last week regarding Renewal SA executives taking leave.
She told ABC Radio in 2015, such announcements “place a cloud over a whole lot of people… it just means that a whole group of people have a cloud over them and that’s unacceptable”.
“Our concern is not that ICAC aren’t doing their job… but if they’re going to make a statement identifying some referral, then either be full and frank about who’s involved or don’t make the statement at all,” she said at the time.
Asked today whether Lander “saved her political skin” by authorising her public statement last week, Chapman said: “I can’t comment on that.”
“I think it’s very clear on the advice I’ve had that there’s no breach of the act, and I’m confident of that advice,” she repeated.

***...and given that AG Chapman still won't answer my multiple letters/emails on my extraordinary "Malicious Prosecution" under the exact piece of legislation described above, ICAC Act 2012 Section 56 (a), everything she/Liberals say on issues of 'secrecy provisions' and related alleged intentions to modify ICAC legislation to address the acknowledged problems and confusion, etc, etc, all of those statements are blatant non-truths well on the way to being outright lies...SA Parliament has always been and remains absolutely in lock-step with the rankly corrupt ICAC it spawned, whilst ICAC continues to do exactly what it was set-up for, to hide and protect the instiutionalised corruption that defines SA... 

Tomorrow: The Long Awaited 'Suppression/Restraining Orders' From My "Bizarre Trial"

Just gunna' leave it there 'cos this is another very long post, but I do encourage dear availees to go back and check-out some more of the many other articles relative to this farcical carnival of ICAC corruption...SA ICAC, where corruption goes to hide and thrive...

I am Nick Fletcher and this 'ere is my blog...cheers and laters...

Friday, October 12, 2018

Bruce Lander - The Insidious Commissioner Assisting Corruption - Sow Straya's Farcically Corrupt ICAC

(Ahahahaaa, nice one man-Ed)...indeed, and as much as I'd love to take credit for that hilarious take on the realities of South Australia's rankly corrupt ICAC...(which is actually supposedly the 'Independent Commission Against Corruption'-Ed)...indeed Ed, and loathe as I am to admit that that particular jibe is better than mine own 'ICARC - Independent Commissioner Against Resolving Corruption'...it is both...(whaaa?-Ed)...well it's 1) better than, and 2) not mine...(ah, I see, so you've stolen it like what you done with the rest of this 'ere post-Ed)...not stolen, used with gracious blessing of the author/source, but sure, most of the rest of this 'ere post is just paste/copied directly...(hmmm-Ed)..."hmmm" ya'self...and anyhoos, where's our manners, a big ol' TMGI howdy to y'all dear availees right here in Oz...(Australia-Ed)...all our bro's in Aotearoa...(New Zealand-Ed)...the good ol' boys and gals in the USofA...(errr, the USofA-Ed)...and of course Poland...(howdy Poland-Ed)...and to any-and-all other dear availees...(helloooooo-Ed)...

So here we go...no apologies for just copy/pasting these articles because otherwise I've got to type it all out myself to prove what it is what I is sayin', and the ultimate reality of it all is a few simple lines...(being?-Ed)...that Attorney General Vicki Chapman either 1) is so confused about the farcically Fascist yet ludicrously undefinable ICAC Act 2012 Section 56 that the AG herself doesn't know when and/or how ICAC legislation applies to her own actions, or 2) she's just lying...(is that the AG Chapman to whom what you've done email/write several times about your rankly corrupt "Malicious Prosecution" and related "bizarre trial" before Magistrate Ian White, etc, etc, etc?-Ed)...well indeed...(and without even an acknowledgement from our mate Vicki, let-alone any sort of actual response, etc, etc, etc?-Ed)...that be she...(and so on and so forth?-Ed)...pardon?...('etc, etc, etc', with a li'l bit of 'and so on and so forth'?-Ed)...oh yes please...

These articles...(and then some-Ed)...are available on The Googles, etc, simply by searching 'ICAC Chapman In Daily', and there's multiple other articles from the ABC, The Australian newspaper, etc...(actually, I've just found some more In Daily articles that are nearly as relevant as they are hilarious, here, check these out-Ed)...oh wow, that is hilarious, particularly the bit where the dude directly quotes the ICAC Act 2012 Section 56, the exact very section what I done be 'Convicted' of supposedly breaching and have written to Vicki Chapman about specifically, etc, etc, etc...(shall I?-Ed)...yeah, go on...(and so on and so forth-Ed)...ahhh look, there's nothing for it, we'll have to do 2 posts today, firstly this one, then another to cover those more recent In Daily articles...(and fair enough-Ed)...so here's this stuff, and then immediately following, more of the same...from here-on is a direct copy/paste...*** 

ICAC commissioner weighs into Renewal SA controversy

Local

ICAC Commissioner Bruce Lander has weighed into the growing scandal surrounding the unexplained absence of senior Renewal SA executives.
Mystery has surrounded the state’s urban renewal agency since a statement from Planning, Transport and Infrastructure Minister Stephan Knoll on Tuesday – and repeated in parliament today – that Renewal SA CEO John Hanlon “and one other Renewal SA executive” were currently on leave, and that he had appointed General Manager of Corporate Services Damian De Luca as Acting Chief Executive.
The Government’s refusal to elaborate prompted tense scenes in an estimates hearing this morning, as reported by InDaily earlier today.
Shortly after the estimates hearing concluded, Attorney-General Vickie Chapman released a statement – which at the time InDaily was unable to publish on legal advice.
However, Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Bruce Lander released his own statement late today, saying: “I authorise the media to publish the Attorney-General’s statement.”
Chapman’s statement says that in “respect of questions about Renewal SA Executives that the Government has received from both the media and the Opposition, I confirm that I have enquired of the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption, Mr Bruce Lander QC, as to whether there is any further information that can be made available on this matter”.
“He confirmed that there is not,” Chapman says in the statement.
“The Commissioner at this stage will not be making a public statement on the matter.
“In these circumstances, I confirm that the Government will not be adding to the statement made by Minister Knoll on Tuesday.”
 
Planning Minister Stephan Knoll and Acting Renewal SA chief Damian De Luca in parliament today. 
Photo: Tony Lewis / InDaily

Lander’s own statement says he “does not intend” to make any further statement “in respect of that matter at this time”.
However, he continues: “On only one occasion have I previously made a public statement in respect of a corruption investigation where I identified the person the subject of the investigation but where the person was not charged.”
“That public statement was made at the request of the person the subject of the investigation and after the investigation had concluded,” he continued.
“Otherwise I have not previously identified anyone [who is] the subject of an investigation during the course of an investigation until after the person has been charged.
“The ICAC Act is designed in such a way that a person [who is] the subject of a corruption investigation ought not suffer reputational harm until such time the person is charged.
“The very purpose of an investigation is to collect evidence. The fact of an investigation is not proof that corruption has occurred. Corruption investigations must be conducted in private. I think that is appropriate.”
Lander said if he “were to make a further statement in respect of this matter there would be an expectation that I would do so in respect of all matters that I might be investigating”, which “would be inconsistent with the legislation under which I operate”.
“For that reason I will not make any further statement at this time,” he said.

***...and here's some more...*** 

EXCLUSIVE: ICAC slams Attorney-General over Renewal SA statement

News

EXCLUSIVE | Anti-corruption commissioner Bruce Lander has lobbed a grenade at the Liberal Government, telling InDaily Attorney-General Vickie Chapman contravened an express agreement not to mention ICAC in a public statement she made about the controversy plaguing Renewal SA.
Mystery has surrounded the state’s urban renewal authority since a statement from Planning Minister Stephan Knoll on Tuesday – repeated in parliament yesterday – that its CEO “and one other executive” were currently on leave and that he had appointed General Manager of Corporate Services Damian De Luca as Acting Chief Executive.
After Knoll refused to elaborate during a tense estimates hearing in parliament yesterday, Chapman released a statement of her own – which at the time InDaily was unable to publish on legal advice.
However, Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Bruce Lander later released his own statement, authorising media to publish Chapman’s comments.
The Attorney’s statement said that in “respect of questions about Renewal SA executives… I confirm that I have enquired of the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption, Mr Bruce Lander QC, as to whether there is any further information that can be made available on this matter”.
“He confirmed that there is not,” Chapman said in the statement.
“The Commissioner at this stage will not be making a public statement on the matter.”
The release prompted questions to Premier Steven Marshall at a media conference today about whether his Attorney-General had contravened the secrecy provisions of the ICAC Act by releasing her statement.
“I wouldn’t think so,” Marshall replied.
“Vickie’s a very capable Attorney-General – I’m sure she sought advice before she made any comment.”
He referred further questions to Lander.
InDaily today asked Lander’s office by email whether the Commissioner believed Chapman’s release “was in itself a breach of the ICAC Act”, and, if so, whether he has communicated this opinion to her or her office.
In response, the Commissioner told InDaily in a statement that he had “received a request to speak to the Attorney-General by telephone yesterday afternoon”.
“My recollection of the subsequent conversation is that any statement made by the Attorney would not include reference to the ICAC and that the Attorney would say publicly that neither she nor the government could comment,” he said.
“I told her that I would not be making a statement.”
Chapman’s own statement – referencing ICAC – was distributed to media at 2.17pm yesterday. Around an hour later her office contacted various media outlets to suggest that it was not suitable for publication.
Lander told InDaily today that after he became aware of Chapman’s statement to media “I requested my Chief Executive to communicate with the Attorney’s office in relation to my recollection of the conversation”.
“I was not intending to make a statement but in light of the Attorney’s statement I was of the view that I should state my position and authorise the publication of the Attorney’s public statement,” he said.
The revelation could have serious ramifications for the Marshall Government’s relationship with the state’s peak integrity agency, and will place the Attorney-General’s actions in the spotlight.
InDaily has sought a response from Chapman. It is believed she is currently in a regional electorate and may be out of phone range.
Lander did not specifically address the question today of whether Chapman had breached the secrecy provisions of the ICAC Act by distributing her own statement to media.
Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Bruce Lander. Photo: AAP/David Mariuz

In his statement yesterday authorising media to publish Chapman’s comments about Renewal SA, Lander said he had only once previously made a public statement “in respect of a corruption investigation where I identified the person [who was] the subject of the investigation but where the person was not charged”.
“That public statement was made at the request of the person [who was] the subject of the investigation and after the investigation had concluded,” he continued.


***...and some of this....***


Chapman denies breaching ICAC Act

Local

Attorney-General Vickie Chapman has broken more than four days of silence to deny she broke the law by breaching the state’s ICAC Act.
In her first public statement since Friday, when InDaily revealed that she was at odds with Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Bruce Lander, Chapman says she has sought legal advice and is “satisfied” she did not breach the secrecy provisions of the law, which prohibits the publication of information that tends to suggest a person is the subject of an ICAC inquiry without the consent of the commissioner.
On Friday, Lander revealed he had told Chapman not to reference ICAC in a public statement she published the previous day – which referenced ICAC.
I am satisfied that no breach of the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2012 has occurred
The revelation intensified Opposition questions about whether or not the Attorney-General breached the ICAC Act when she published her own statement, which was addressing “questions about Renewal SA executives that the Government has received”.
Media did not republish the Attorney’s statement at the time, on legal advice – despite her office telling various outlets it was suitable for publication.
The statement, which Lander subsequently authorised media to publish, said Chapman had “enquired of the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption, Mr Bruce Lander QC, as to whether there is any further information that can be made available on this matter”.
“He confirmed that there is not,” it continued.
“The Commissioner at this stage will not be making a public statement on the matter.”
The following day, Lander told InDaily that he had “received a request to speak to the Attorney-General by telephone”.
“My recollection of the subsequent conversation is that any statement made by the Attorney would not include reference to the ICAC and that the Attorney would say publicly that neither she nor the government could comment,” Lander said in emailed comments.
“I told her that I would not be making a statement. After I became aware of the Attorney’s statement I requested my Chief Executive to communicate with the Attorney’s office in relation to my recollection of the conversation. I was not intending to make a statement but in light of the Attorney’s statement, I was of the view that I should state my position and authorise the publication of the Attorney’s public statement.”
Neither Chapman nor the Government responded to numerous requests for comment over the long weekend, despite Planning Minister Stephan Knoll specifically referring questions on the matter to the Attorney-General.
However, late today, she released a two-line statement, saying: “In response to recent reports in the media, I have taken legal advice and reviewed the statement and related events.”
“I am satisfied that no breach of the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2012 has occurred,” Chapman said.
It followed calls from Opposition Leader Peter Malinauskas that Chapman stand down pending an independent judicial review.
“We do not take this decision lightly [but] these events are somewhat extraordinary,” Malinauskas said.
“It is simply untenable to have a situation where the Attorney-General of the state has questions hanging over them about whether or not they have broken the law.”
He responded to the Attorney’s subsequent statement by saying: “Plainly Vickie Chapman is not able to offer an independent assessment of her own actions.”
“The total lack of information in the Attorney General’s statement only further demonstrates the need for an independent judicial inquiry,” he said.
InDaily asked Lander today whether he believed the Attorney had breached the ICAC Act, with a spokesperson responding that “the Commissioner is of the view that it is not appropriate for him to publicly offer a legal opinion as to whether any person has committed any offence”.
“He has never before offered such opinion publicly as that is not his role,” they said.

***....and so there y'all have it...(well that's just a farcical nonsense, how has that cleared it up at all?-Ed)...mate! who says that it can be cleared-up?...(mmm, fair point-Ed)...but I'd suggest it's fairly clear that my original points remain relevant, namely, either AG Chapman doesn't know what she's doing/done, or she's lied...(or the ICAC Act 2012 Section 56 is so farcically undefinable as to make these sort of mistakes not just possible, not even just likely, but fundamentally unavoidable-Ed)...well sure, but I include all that under point '1)', that is, the ICAC Act 2012 Section 56 is so ludicrously convoluted and unworkable, that even the Attorney General cannot understand it properly...(in a context where saying, 'I cannot comment' is in effect 'making a comment'?-Ed)...well virtually, yeah, just mentioning that the ICAC Commissioner is involved, or even just mentioning the ICAC full-stop, and/or where-in saying that you can't comment is in fact commenting that the ICAC is involved, which is itself technically a breach of the rancidly corrupt ICAC Act 2102 Section 56, etc, etc...(urghhh, my head hurts-Ed)...your head hurts?! what about mine?! you're in my head, you confected literary device!...(well sure, but that's hardly my fault is it?-Ed)...ok, sure, fair enough...

The most fundamental bottom-line is that the ICAC Act 2012 Section 56 is entirely undefinable and criminalises any statement about any aspect of supposed/alleged/potential corruption...and that ain't no unfortunate accident, it's very deliberately undefinable, that's exactly what the rancidly corrupt Rann/Weatherill Labor government sought to achieve, 'cos it makes literally everything a breach of the Act should the government/ICAC choose to come after you for it...(where the government and ICAC are entirely not independent of each other-Ed)...well precisely, the ICAC Act 2012 is one massive con that seeks to hide/protect the high-level institutionalised corruption that defines South Australia, not least-of-all by quite deliberately criminalising any-and-all 'Whistleblowing'...   

Later Today: More Hilarious 'Insidious Commissioner Assisting Corruption'

Must admit though, that new and massively facetious gouge at South Australia's rancidly corrupt ICAC is really rather growing on me...(well I still like your li'l effort, "Bruce 'Libellous Tempest In A Teapot' Lander", wittily mocking the 'Brews Slander' reality of the ICAC Commissioner's name-Ed)...orrrr cheers mate, I think it's important to at least try to bring a degree of wit to one's rabidly furious abuse...(and don't we both do both those things with a certain aplomb-Ed)...well quite...

And in closing, further apologies for not yet getting to the actual 'Suppression/Restraining Orders' that we've been posting about and repeatedly promising, but we will get there, and if y'all are really hangin'-out for it, a lot of that stuff has been covered in previous posts earlier this year...

I am Nick Fletcher and this is my blog and cheers and laters...