And Dear Google:...yet again I ask that if MGCC and/or Cr Lynagh come a bleatin' to y'all about 'defamation' or whatevs, please read this 'ere post and consider the Unpleasant Truths here-in, and how Cr Lynagh has grossly mis-used a Third Party's website/page...dear Google, whilst what I say may be dripping with vengeance and retribution, it's still merely a response to a public discussion about me in which I and/or this 'ere blog was repeatedly referred to and denigrated, etc, and at one point I and TMGI were named in full, and my response is spot-on accurate and relatively restrained...
Everyone's Mate, Cr Josh:...is a low, selfish and deceitful individual who reckons he's being jolly clever, don't ya' li'l fella'? jolly clever by going onto someone else's Facebook page and deliberately deceiving and manipulating Mt Gambier Ratepayers...and he laid it all out for everyone to see on local history/family memories Facebook page Growing Up In The Mount (GUITM), last Wednesday 8th November 2017 when, during a 'posting-chat' about the Old Rail Station, li'l Joshy was denigrating me and/or this 'ere blog and/or those who avail themselves of it and/or believe it, etc, etc...(take a breath dude!-Ed)...and poor li'l Josh was losing very, very badly...(indeed, was apparently being swamped by the backwash of his own deceits-Ed)...apparently, so then he started posting about 'paedophile corruption', before then whinging about his own comments, apparently allegedly out of concern for me!...(but he put those comments up in the first place?!-Ed)...indeed, and then tried to reverse out of the mire he'd driven himself into by saying 'I'm concerned about airing this publicly' (paraphrase but damn close to a quote)...
This 'I'm concerned for him' shizzle is a deeply disingenuous, attempted-but-failed, thinly-veiled denigration of my Mental Health issues, the vast majority of which I've discussed right here on this 'ere blog which Cr Josh is apparently reading...(they're all reading us mate, they're all availees of this 'ere blog-Ed)...are you sure mate? 'cos all they tell me is that 'no-one's reading your blog'...(mmm, MGCC being deceitful?-Ed)...yeah, fair point, they are all reading it aren't they, howdy y'all...(and if they ain't readin' it they're still talking about it-Ed)...and apparently, they talk about me all the time...(cut to the The Young Ones sketch from Nasty where-in the lads are sitting 'off-set' discussing Alexei Sayle, "and they all talk about me behind me back", says Alexei, 'I hate 'im', 'he drinks like a fish', 'well he's got no talent', 'Nick who?'...I changed that last bit to Nick just for extra comic affect-Ed)...indeed, too funny Ed, just too funny...
I am aware of GUITM, but it's exactly the sort of website that I wouldn't dream of going near, and most especially with any Politicking, and most especially particularly with my brand of Head-Kickin' Page-Raging as evidenced here on TMGI...there's no way on gourd's green Earth that I would go onto GUITM and raise the issue of Paedophilia, in any context...(mate, you wouldn't even go onto Cr Lynagh's site and raise those sorts of issues! it's outrageously inappropriate-Ed)...indeed, there is no circumstance under which it is appropriate for anyone to go onto GUITM or websites of that ilk, and raise the issue of Paedophilia...(but that didn't stop Cr Lynagh-Ed)...but that didn't stop Cr Lynagh...what an absolute disgrace you are Josh, an absolute bloody disgrace...
Obviously I missed the discussion that evening, and MGCC/Cr Lynagh had already contacted GUITM's Administration peeps and had had the entire discussion removed before I go to it, but I've spoken to several peeps who were either in that discussion', or were watching it from 'off-blog', like I was when MGCC/Cr Josh went back for a second go on Thursday morning...and people ain't none-too-pleased with you Cr Josh for your abysmal attempts to distance MGCC from your clearly politicised 'personal opinions'...I'm also aware of Cr Josh's li'l Facebook page, Limestone Coast Community News...(isn't that the one where-in early this year he posted/copied that interstate news story about a huge Mt Gambier Child Abuse 'incident', a posting/copying that resulted directly in people contacting you/me/this 'ere blog to ask WTFN?, that website?-Ed)...that's the one...and what's the 'N' in 'WTFN?'?...('Nick'-Ed)...ah, of course...
Dear Josh, Mate:...(maaate-Ed)...my son was the first person to tell me about your little effort, before I've heard plenty more about it from others...well done Josh, like he hasn't had to endure enough from this rankly pro-paedophile corrupt town he calls home, he's got vacuous clowns like you mouthing-off in deliberately deceitful ways about issues that you really shouldn't be so stupid as to broach...but clearly you are exactly that stupid Josh, mate...(maaate-Ed)...because you have raised the Paedophilia issue, and so, you're going to get what's a comin' to ya' for being a complicit Member of the rankly pro-paedophile corrupt Mt Gambier City Council...don't want to be labelled a rankly corrupt pro-paedophile MGCC Councillor, mate, don't shreckin' be one!...
How dare you raise your pro-paedophile corruption, let alone in such a way, because you've known about the St Martins Lutheran School Child Abuse Cover-up since before you were a Councillor, in exactly the same way you've known exactly what MGCC 'plans' to do with the iconic Old Rail Station, because you've had it explained to you, mate...and when it comes to the St Martins Cover-up, what exactly have you done about it Josh?..sorry, what's that mate? nothing? sweet shreck-all?...so when you act in such a calculated manner and with such deliberate deceit on a specific MGCC Agenda, the Rail Lands Retail Agenda, expect to be held to account, regardless of where you go to do it, but when you use the Paedophile stuff to pursue that agenda and manipulate the debate, etc, I'm going to rain down on you like that shower of Nick you so thoroughly deserve...
And what did you think was gunna' happen Josh? you've got your own tepid piece of grossly biased dross you call your Facebook page, what is it? Limestone Coast Community News? so why don't you get back there, back in ya' li'l box, mate, 'cos all what you've actually done is just really, really piss me off and motivated me to really go after your rank deceits and grossly corrupted MGCC agenda-spruiking...seriously mate, I thought that Cr Frank Morello's moronic ambush stunt outside the September 2017 MGCC Full Meeting was an indicative act of singular stupidity and stupendous desperation, but this lĂ'l Rail Station discussion on GUITM effort is a whole new level of rankly pro-paedophile corrupt cowardice...
Say it to my face Josh you gutless disgrace, you ain't got it in you, you ain't got what it takes...think ya' clever mate? pleased with your sly smug smart-arse weasel-word bastardry? well come and try it on with a bigger, slyer, smugger, smarter-arsier, Man-Weasel Uber-Bastard...I will verbally dismantle you into your component Elements and cast you back whence you came, back into the crucible of pro-paedophile local government corruption that is Mt Gambier City Council...(I just love how you bring such poetry to your Angerings-Ed)...well I wouldn't call it poetry exactly...
MGCC/Cr Lynagh is so desperate about me and/or this 'ere li'l ol' blog and the backlash TMGI is causing to their rank corruption re the Old Rail Station and the Rail Land Retail Agenda...(yeah, that and everything else on this 'ere blog-Ed)...sure, and they're that desperate they'll go onto a completely innocuous non-political Facebook page and conduct themselves in such an outrageously inappropriate manner...you people are a bloody disgrace...anyhoos, here's most of the discussion from the Thursday that I've pasted directly across then spent ages checking that actual names, etc, were deleted 'cos I reckon most of these people are merely decent people wrongly trusting of a deeply cynical and deceitful and corrupt Cr Lynagh, acting on behalf of the rankly pro-paedophile corrupt MGCC...as stated, I watched but did not participate in this discussion, so my comments are added afters here on this 'ere blog and are not on GUITM, and are identified thusly, *witty banter*...cheers...
I just wanted to clear up some things regarding the old Station building at the Railway Lands.
Yesterday, someone posted here that someone who was apparently at a Council meeting told them that they heard Council were demolishing the building to make way for a carpark. There was then a series of comments about how we should all rally together to save the building.
Anyone who knows how that platform works, knows that even if the building were to be demolished, people would have to drive up steps to get on the platform to park their cars there. So the theory already makes little sense.
The truth is, there are no plans whatsoever for Council to demolish the
building, in fact the plans have always been to repair the building
(which has been in really bad shape from before Council acquired it) and
utilise it in some way. There was talk originally of a cafe, but the
Dining Car has since opened there. There has also been discussions about
it being an art space. Nothing concrete - except the fact that there
are no plans at all to demolish it.
Please also note that while this information is completely correct and direct from Council this post and any comments that may follow are my own personal views and not the views of Council as a whole in any way, shape or form.
*It's me...where to start?...
1) Cr Josh makes a series of outrageously inappropriate comments then has them pulled down then is back only hours later having another go, deliberately trying to make the issue look ridiculous and/or hearsay, followed by more ludicrous statements about driving-up onto the platform...what MGCC did do was buried 30+ carparks under that superfluous and costly platform extension, and have kept the Bay Rd end clear for further carpark re the RLRA;
2) more disingenuous word-weaselling...of course Council doesn't have a 'Public Official Plan' for demolition, but that's exactly what MGCC has planned for the Old Station, because it's in the way of MGCC's ongoing proposed massive Retail/Commercial expansion onto the Rail Lands, which I call the Rail Lands Retail Agenda...just look at what MGCC has and/or hasn't done on that site, the RLRA is an Undeniable Reality that Cr Lynagh has had explained to him but deceitfully feigns ignorance of...
3) MGCC have refused/blocked several attempts to repair/renovate/utilise the Old Station, eg, recently blocking a $100,000 Fund My Neighbourhood grant application specifically for removing all the Asbestos in the entire building; refusing community groups/cafes/whatevs; and of course the notorious Bus Terminus corruption debasco (debacle/fiasco), another classic Rort-riddled Fib-fest from the rankly corrupt MGCC...
4) I have never seen or heard MGCC present any 'plan to repair' the iconic Old Rail Station...this is self-evidently an outright lie, proven by the current state of the building due to MGCC's huge expenditure across the site on everything else but that, and I challenge MGCC and/or their agent Cr Josh to produce this 'plan'...this is Cr J outsmarting himself with his own attempted slyness...on one hand, it's a fact that demolition ain't happening because there's no actual physical 'plan', but then it's a fact that 'repairs' are planned but there's no actual physical 'plan'...(geez, you get right in there don't ya'?-Ed)...like I said mate, don't play weasel-word bastard games with ManWeazel Uber-Bastard!...(fair enough-Ed)...
5) MGCC organised the current cafe, refused it going in the Old Station, instead forcing it right down the far end away from the Old Station, in a shreckin' shipping container!...Cr Josh knows this...
6) there have been very specific 'Art plans', as covered later in 'Comments'...yet again Cr Lynagh is deceitfully feigning ignorance...(but the 'no demolition plan' is 'concrete'?-Ed)...well exactly...
7) this last paragraph is just a joke, this entire 'episode' is a MGCC Councillor deceitfully running the MGCC's deeply corrupted RLRA, every single word of it is MGCC...*
Please also note that while this information is completely correct and direct from Council this post and any comments that may follow are my own personal views and not the views of Council as a whole in any way, shape or form.
*It's me...where to start?...
1) Cr Josh makes a series of outrageously inappropriate comments then has them pulled down then is back only hours later having another go, deliberately trying to make the issue look ridiculous and/or hearsay, followed by more ludicrous statements about driving-up onto the platform...what MGCC did do was buried 30+ carparks under that superfluous and costly platform extension, and have kept the Bay Rd end clear for further carpark re the RLRA;
2) more disingenuous word-weaselling...of course Council doesn't have a 'Public Official Plan' for demolition, but that's exactly what MGCC has planned for the Old Station, because it's in the way of MGCC's ongoing proposed massive Retail/Commercial expansion onto the Rail Lands, which I call the Rail Lands Retail Agenda...just look at what MGCC has and/or hasn't done on that site, the RLRA is an Undeniable Reality that Cr Lynagh has had explained to him but deceitfully feigns ignorance of...
3) MGCC have refused/blocked several attempts to repair/renovate/utilise the Old Station, eg, recently blocking a $100,000 Fund My Neighbourhood grant application specifically for removing all the Asbestos in the entire building; refusing community groups/cafes/whatevs; and of course the notorious Bus Terminus corruption debasco (debacle/fiasco), another classic Rort-riddled Fib-fest from the rankly corrupt MGCC...
4) I have never seen or heard MGCC present any 'plan to repair' the iconic Old Rail Station...this is self-evidently an outright lie, proven by the current state of the building due to MGCC's huge expenditure across the site on everything else but that, and I challenge MGCC and/or their agent Cr Josh to produce this 'plan'...this is Cr J outsmarting himself with his own attempted slyness...on one hand, it's a fact that demolition ain't happening because there's no actual physical 'plan', but then it's a fact that 'repairs' are planned but there's no actual physical 'plan'...(geez, you get right in there don't ya'?-Ed)...like I said mate, don't play weasel-word bastard games with ManWeazel Uber-Bastard!...(fair enough-Ed)...
5) MGCC organised the current cafe, refused it going in the Old Station, instead forcing it right down the far end away from the Old Station, in a shreckin' shipping container!...Cr Josh knows this...
6) there have been very specific 'Art plans', as covered later in 'Comments'...yet again Cr Lynagh is deceitfully feigning ignorance...(but the 'no demolition plan' is 'concrete'?-Ed)...well exactly...
7) this last paragraph is just a joke, this entire 'episode' is a MGCC Councillor deceitfully running the MGCC's deeply corrupted RLRA, every single word of it is MGCC...*
- Someone's Comment - "It would still be great as a cafe/restaurant with live music and outdoor tables, fairy lights etc even as a venue , it's not that big but people would use it for events and parties."
Josh Lynagh There
is currently a cafe there already, and I think the area is fairly
simple to set up for live music events as we've seen in the past.
Personally, I'd love to see something a little more related to art or history happen with the building..- Comment - history, yes. over the "art"
- C - Sounds
lovely (*name removed*), there have been functions as you described without using
the Railway building & there are 3 coming up as pre Christmas
events, so organisers have been able to create that atmosphere around
the building with the fairy lights etc. without actually having to go
into the building.
- C - I don't get out much 
đ sounds great!
- C - art and history could be combined very nicley in the old station and would fit well with the building. It would also be nice to see the roundhouse incorporated into telling the story/history of the rail lands as it is 1 of only 2 left in SA. I am certain a couple of community groups could combine together to organize art and history at the station.
đ sounds great! - C - art and history could be combined very nicley in the old station and would fit well with the building. It would also be nice to see the roundhouse incorporated into telling the story/history of the rail lands as it is 1 of only 2 left in SA. I am certain a couple of community groups could combine together to organize art and history at the station.
*me again...this is absolute bollocks from MGCC/Cr Josh, he knows damn well that MGCC has repeatedly blocked attempts to have 'art or history happen' in the Old Station, as explained by the very next 'Commentor'...*
- C - When
the council called for expressions of interest for use of the old
railway station a local comunity group put in a well thought out
proposal for a cafe/gallery/history display to service both the local
community and vistors to our area. When this group
was invited to meet with council sub committee they were informed that
"the goal posts had been changed" and the council no longer wished to
have anything permanent in the station but were looking to try "pop up"
events/shops. To this date I have been informed by a councillor that the
inside of the station has mostly used just for storage and that no
major maintenance has been carried out. General maintenance to the
exterior of the building would not only preserve the Building but would
enchance the looks of the whole platform area. The group who put forward
the proposal would have been prepared to invest in the maintenance and
refurbishment of the building however short term "pop up" shops would
not invest in the long term maintenance. Using the station as a storage
shed will also not raise any revenue for maintenance.
*me...here's a brief explanation of exactly how deceitfully MGCC have conducted themselves in refusing to allow anyone to use the Old Station, from one of those involved...*
*me...here's a brief explanation of exactly how deceitfully MGCC have conducted themselves in refusing to allow anyone to use the Old Station, from one of those involved...*
- C - Well said... Thanks Josh
- C - Classic
example of people over reacting based on hearsay...happens all too
regularly. It's a shame these people don't put their energy into
positive pursuits
đ¤
*me...someone who doesn't know what they're talking about, dismissing someone else's statements as 'hearsay'', now that's irony, and an irony doubled by the observation about 'energy into positive pursuits, this from a 'keyboard warrior' I don't recall ever seeing at a MGCC meeting...*
đ¤*me...someone who doesn't know what they're talking about, dismissing someone else's statements as 'hearsay'', now that's irony, and an irony doubled by the observation about 'energy into positive pursuits, this from a 'keyboard warrior' I don't recall ever seeing at a MGCC meeting...*
Josh Lynagh - We were almost at the witch-hunt phase of it, haha. At
full Council meetings, there's usually one person there. Maybe twice a
year we will have someone else. Standing Committee meetings, I don't
believe I've ever seen a member of the public at. I'd love
to see people who clearly have an interest in what Council does based
on their constant Facebook criticism, to have the Council experience and
get more of an idea how things work. I found it a little challenging
when I first started going, but it's quite interesting, and definitely
helps your case when speaking publicly on issues 
:)
:)*me...typical Lynagh, make outrageously inappropriate statements deliberately designed to denigrate me and de-rail the whole issue of the Old Station, etc, and then joke about a "witch-hunt"...and who would that "one person" be Josh? that is a direct and again thinly veiled reference to moi, who does go to meetings and cops nothing but abuse and harassment for me troubles, and the rest is mindless drivel...Josh, mate, apart from one or two occasions, you "first started going" to Council meetings when you became a Councillor...*
- C - Mate I bet you have deleted your almost finished replies on many occasions and let a cool head prevail instead!! Ha ha patience of Job required for this gig
đ
Josh Lynagh - Removing
half-written comments is my life, haha. Nah, I've had enough practice
responding to false information on Facebook and having official
complaints put in against me for doing so, to know how to respond
properly haha. Practice makes perfect!
- C - The
individual public numbers you receive at a council meeting is fairly
standard around here. Prior to becoming an NRM group member, several
years ago with DEWNR, I attended an NRM board meeting and was surprised I
was only one of two public members there. Even during my four years as
an NRM group member the individual members of the public who attended
those meetings I could count on one hand.
*me...saying this is blowing-out so's I'll pull stumps here and say...
Tomorrow: The Rest Of This Dross From Cr Lynagh
Only half ways through but y'all get the jist I'm sure, a litany of deliberate deceits from a rankly corrupt Mt Gambier City Council, via a feeble-minded stooge who thinks he's being clever...
I am Nick Fletcher and this is my blog...cheers and laters...
No comments:
Post a Comment